在结束艾滋病毒流行优先社区中,妇女之间的艾滋病毒预防和性健康对话:经验和偏好的定性探索

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Katherine M. Anderson, Anandi N. Sheth, Dazon Dixon Diallo, Celeste Ellison, Deja L. Er, Adaora Ntukogu, Kelli Komro, Jessica M. Sales
{"title":"在结束艾滋病毒流行优先社区中,妇女之间的艾滋病毒预防和性健康对话:经验和偏好的定性探索","authors":"Katherine M. Anderson,&nbsp;Anandi N. Sheth,&nbsp;Dazon Dixon Diallo,&nbsp;Celeste Ellison,&nbsp;Deja L. Er,&nbsp;Adaora Ntukogu,&nbsp;Kelli Komro,&nbsp;Jessica M. Sales","doi":"10.1007/s10508-025-03108-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite significant advances in HIV prevention, women comprise ~ 20% of new HIV infections in the USA. New infections occur primarily in the South and among Black women, with research demonstrating that insufficient knowledge, inaccurate risk assessment, and HIV stigma impair HIV prevention. Understanding how cisgender women wish to communicate about sexual health and HIV prevention is vital to facilitating conversations about, and subsequent uptake of prevention methods. A total of 70 individuals who lived or worked in four HIV prevention priority counties in the state of Georgia were recruited through community-based organizations (CBOs) and flyers. Consenting participants completed 30–45-min interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim; transcripts were coded deductively and inductively. Participants were primarily female-identifying (91%) and were primarily Black. Overall, participants noted that community-level conversations about sexual health among women were limited due to stigma, despite endorsed comfort with conversations. Participants noted that media/community sources implied HIV prevention was unneeded for cisgender women. CBOs and informed community members were endorsed as trusted sources for information; clinicians were cited as a theoretically trusted source, particularly sexual health preventative care providers with established patient relationships, though barriers of medical mistrust, lack of cultural concordance, and stigma were noted. Suggestions for improved communication around HIV prevention included use of community members/trusted sources to facilitate conversation, promotion of non-judgment in clinical practice, and prevention awareness building. Participants’ responses suggest little-to-no movement in knowledge of HIV prevention for US women. Engagement of CBOs in community education, training of community leaders, and integration of trauma-informed and patient-empowering clinical practices should be explored to promote increased HIV prevention discussion and uptake among cisgender women in the US South.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8327,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","volume":"54 4","pages":"1537 - 1553"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HIV Prevention and Sexual Health Conversations Among Women in Ending the HIV Epidemic Priority Communities: A Qualitative Exploration of Experiences and Preferences\",\"authors\":\"Katherine M. Anderson,&nbsp;Anandi N. Sheth,&nbsp;Dazon Dixon Diallo,&nbsp;Celeste Ellison,&nbsp;Deja L. Er,&nbsp;Adaora Ntukogu,&nbsp;Kelli Komro,&nbsp;Jessica M. Sales\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10508-025-03108-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Despite significant advances in HIV prevention, women comprise ~ 20% of new HIV infections in the USA. New infections occur primarily in the South and among Black women, with research demonstrating that insufficient knowledge, inaccurate risk assessment, and HIV stigma impair HIV prevention. Understanding how cisgender women wish to communicate about sexual health and HIV prevention is vital to facilitating conversations about, and subsequent uptake of prevention methods. A total of 70 individuals who lived or worked in four HIV prevention priority counties in the state of Georgia were recruited through community-based organizations (CBOs) and flyers. Consenting participants completed 30–45-min interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim; transcripts were coded deductively and inductively. Participants were primarily female-identifying (91%) and were primarily Black. Overall, participants noted that community-level conversations about sexual health among women were limited due to stigma, despite endorsed comfort with conversations. Participants noted that media/community sources implied HIV prevention was unneeded for cisgender women. CBOs and informed community members were endorsed as trusted sources for information; clinicians were cited as a theoretically trusted source, particularly sexual health preventative care providers with established patient relationships, though barriers of medical mistrust, lack of cultural concordance, and stigma were noted. Suggestions for improved communication around HIV prevention included use of community members/trusted sources to facilitate conversation, promotion of non-judgment in clinical practice, and prevention awareness building. Participants’ responses suggest little-to-no movement in knowledge of HIV prevention for US women. Engagement of CBOs in community education, training of community leaders, and integration of trauma-informed and patient-empowering clinical practices should be explored to promote increased HIV prevention discussion and uptake among cisgender women in the US South.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Sexual Behavior\",\"volume\":\"54 4\",\"pages\":\"1537 - 1553\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Sexual Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-025-03108-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-025-03108-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管在艾滋病毒预防方面取得了重大进展,但在美国,妇女占新感染艾滋病毒的约20%。新的感染主要发生在南方和黑人妇女中,研究表明,知识不足、风险评估不准确以及对艾滋病毒的污名化损害了艾滋病毒的预防。了解顺性妇女希望如何就性健康和艾滋病毒预防问题进行沟通,对于促进有关预防方法的对话和随后采取预防方法至关重要。通过社区组织(cbo)和传单,总共招募了70名在佐治亚州四个艾滋病毒预防重点县生活或工作的个人。同意的参与者完成了30 - 45分钟的访谈。采访被逐字记录;转录本采用演绎编码和归纳编码。参与者主要是女性(91%),主要是黑人。总体而言,与会者指出,尽管人们赞同对话带来的安慰,但由于耻辱感,社区一级关于妇女性健康的对话受到限制。与会者指出,媒体/社区消息来源暗示,对顺性妇女不需要预防艾滋病毒。社区组织和知情社区成员被认可为可信赖的信息来源;临床医生被认为是理论上值得信赖的来源,特别是与患者建立了关系的性健康预防保健提供者,尽管指出了医疗不信任、缺乏文化一致性和耻辱的障碍。改善艾滋病毒预防沟通的建议包括利用社区成员/可信来源促进对话,在临床实践中促进非判断,以及建立预防意识。参与者的回答表明,美国女性在艾滋病预防知识方面几乎没有任何进展。应探索社区卫生组织参与社区教育、社区领导人培训以及创伤知情和患者授权临床实践的整合,以促进美国南部顺性女性对艾滋病毒预防的讨论和接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
HIV Prevention and Sexual Health Conversations Among Women in Ending the HIV Epidemic Priority Communities: A Qualitative Exploration of Experiences and Preferences

Despite significant advances in HIV prevention, women comprise ~ 20% of new HIV infections in the USA. New infections occur primarily in the South and among Black women, with research demonstrating that insufficient knowledge, inaccurate risk assessment, and HIV stigma impair HIV prevention. Understanding how cisgender women wish to communicate about sexual health and HIV prevention is vital to facilitating conversations about, and subsequent uptake of prevention methods. A total of 70 individuals who lived or worked in four HIV prevention priority counties in the state of Georgia were recruited through community-based organizations (CBOs) and flyers. Consenting participants completed 30–45-min interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim; transcripts were coded deductively and inductively. Participants were primarily female-identifying (91%) and were primarily Black. Overall, participants noted that community-level conversations about sexual health among women were limited due to stigma, despite endorsed comfort with conversations. Participants noted that media/community sources implied HIV prevention was unneeded for cisgender women. CBOs and informed community members were endorsed as trusted sources for information; clinicians were cited as a theoretically trusted source, particularly sexual health preventative care providers with established patient relationships, though barriers of medical mistrust, lack of cultural concordance, and stigma were noted. Suggestions for improved communication around HIV prevention included use of community members/trusted sources to facilitate conversation, promotion of non-judgment in clinical practice, and prevention awareness building. Participants’ responses suggest little-to-no movement in knowledge of HIV prevention for US women. Engagement of CBOs in community education, training of community leaders, and integration of trauma-informed and patient-empowering clinical practices should be explored to promote increased HIV prevention discussion and uptake among cisgender women in the US South.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
299
期刊介绍: The official publication of the International Academy of Sex Research, the journal is dedicated to the dissemination of information in the field of sexual science, broadly defined. Contributions consist of empirical research (both quantitative and qualitative), theoretical reviews and essays, clinical case reports, letters to the editor, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信