S E Purchase, J Brigden, J A Seddon, N A Martinson, L Fairlie, S Staples, A Poswa, T Duong, H S Schaaf, A C Hesseling
{"title":"250mg左氧氟沙星制剂在接受结核病预防治疗的儿童中的可接受性。","authors":"S E Purchase, J Brigden, J A Seddon, N A Martinson, L Fairlie, S Staples, A Poswa, T Duong, H S Schaaf, A C Hesseling","doi":"10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent evidence indicates that levofloxacin (LFX) is effective in preventing TB in individuals exposed to multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB). Despite the need for pediatric formulations, the 250 mg adult LFX formulation is affordable and widely used for TB treatment and prevention in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TB-CHAMP (Tuberculosis Child Multidrug-resistant Preventive Therapy ISRCTN92634082) was a trial of MDR-TB preventive treatment, comparing levofloxacin to placebo in children with MDR-TB exposure. Acceptability questionnaires were administered to caregivers at six timepoints during the 24-week treatment phase. Likert scales were used to grade 6 domains of acceptability, and a composite acceptability (CA) outcome was generated. Factors associated with acceptability were assessed using modified Poisson regression models to estimate risk ratios (RRs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 922 children were randomised, 453 to LFX and 469 to placebo. By Week 8, 25.1% of children on LFX had poor CA versus 6.2% receiving placebo (Weeks 0-24: RR 3.43, 95% CI 2.69-4.37). Acceptability in the LFX arm improved from 36.8% poor CA at baseline to 12.9% at Week 24. Only 11.7% of children swallowing tablets whole/halved had poor CA outcomes at Week 8, compared to 34.4% swallowing crushed/softened tablets.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LFX 250 mg tablets have reasonable acceptability and could be used as an alternative to dispersible formulations, especially in children able to swallow tablets.</p>","PeriodicalId":519984,"journal":{"name":"IJTLD open","volume":"2 3","pages":"129-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11906031/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acceptability of a 250 mg levofloxacin formulation in children receiving TB preventive treatment.\",\"authors\":\"S E Purchase, J Brigden, J A Seddon, N A Martinson, L Fairlie, S Staples, A Poswa, T Duong, H S Schaaf, A C Hesseling\",\"doi\":\"10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0569\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent evidence indicates that levofloxacin (LFX) is effective in preventing TB in individuals exposed to multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB). Despite the need for pediatric formulations, the 250 mg adult LFX formulation is affordable and widely used for TB treatment and prevention in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TB-CHAMP (Tuberculosis Child Multidrug-resistant Preventive Therapy ISRCTN92634082) was a trial of MDR-TB preventive treatment, comparing levofloxacin to placebo in children with MDR-TB exposure. Acceptability questionnaires were administered to caregivers at six timepoints during the 24-week treatment phase. Likert scales were used to grade 6 domains of acceptability, and a composite acceptability (CA) outcome was generated. Factors associated with acceptability were assessed using modified Poisson regression models to estimate risk ratios (RRs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 922 children were randomised, 453 to LFX and 469 to placebo. By Week 8, 25.1% of children on LFX had poor CA versus 6.2% receiving placebo (Weeks 0-24: RR 3.43, 95% CI 2.69-4.37). Acceptability in the LFX arm improved from 36.8% poor CA at baseline to 12.9% at Week 24. Only 11.7% of children swallowing tablets whole/halved had poor CA outcomes at Week 8, compared to 34.4% swallowing crushed/softened tablets.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LFX 250 mg tablets have reasonable acceptability and could be used as an alternative to dispersible formulations, especially in children able to swallow tablets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJTLD open\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"129-136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11906031/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJTLD open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0569\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJTLD open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Acceptability of a 250 mg levofloxacin formulation in children receiving TB preventive treatment.
Background: Recent evidence indicates that levofloxacin (LFX) is effective in preventing TB in individuals exposed to multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB). Despite the need for pediatric formulations, the 250 mg adult LFX formulation is affordable and widely used for TB treatment and prevention in children.
Methods: TB-CHAMP (Tuberculosis Child Multidrug-resistant Preventive Therapy ISRCTN92634082) was a trial of MDR-TB preventive treatment, comparing levofloxacin to placebo in children with MDR-TB exposure. Acceptability questionnaires were administered to caregivers at six timepoints during the 24-week treatment phase. Likert scales were used to grade 6 domains of acceptability, and a composite acceptability (CA) outcome was generated. Factors associated with acceptability were assessed using modified Poisson regression models to estimate risk ratios (RRs).
Results: Overall, 922 children were randomised, 453 to LFX and 469 to placebo. By Week 8, 25.1% of children on LFX had poor CA versus 6.2% receiving placebo (Weeks 0-24: RR 3.43, 95% CI 2.69-4.37). Acceptability in the LFX arm improved from 36.8% poor CA at baseline to 12.9% at Week 24. Only 11.7% of children swallowing tablets whole/halved had poor CA outcomes at Week 8, compared to 34.4% swallowing crushed/softened tablets.
Conclusion: LFX 250 mg tablets have reasonable acceptability and could be used as an alternative to dispersible formulations, especially in children able to swallow tablets.