低温常压血浆(LTAPP)在多中心治疗压疮中的疗效:一项随机对照试验。

Warangkana Tonaree, Sitthichoke Taweepraditpol, Natthapong Kongkunnavat, Nattanit Poungjantaradej, Boonyaporn Kotistienkul, Min Yongsuvimol, Kusuma Chinaroonchai, Pitawan Rachata, Pattana Ongkasuwan, Orawan Chansanti, Atthawit Mongkornwong, Chonlathorn Chaichote, Apirag Chuangsuwanich
{"title":"低温常压血浆(LTAPP)在多中心治疗压疮中的疗效:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Warangkana Tonaree, Sitthichoke Taweepraditpol, Natthapong Kongkunnavat, Nattanit Poungjantaradej, Boonyaporn Kotistienkul, Min Yongsuvimol, Kusuma Chinaroonchai, Pitawan Rachata, Pattana Ongkasuwan, Orawan Chansanti, Atthawit Mongkornwong, Chonlathorn Chaichote, Apirag Chuangsuwanich","doi":"10.1177/15347346251323940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionThis study is to examine the reduction in wound size between the LTAPP and the control group and also investigate the wound healing effect factor.MethodsA randomized controlled trial was conducted at five study centers. Participated patients were between 18-80 years old who had pressure ulcer wound(s) and excluded patients with high risk or receiving other treatment such as previous radiation therapy in the affected area, pregnancy, sepsis, and immunocompromised host. The study divided participant into LTAPP group and standard of care (SOC) group, the LTAPP group would received a dressing of non-Ag materials and administer LTAPP for 1 min per 1 cm<sup>2</sup> (maximum of 20 min). The SOC group would received standard dressing wound protocol. Both groups would be followed until the end of study (ninth visit) or until the wound healed.ResultsWhen considering patients who attended follow-up ≥4 visits, only 45 ulcers were eligible, of which consisted of 21 ulcers in the LTAPP group and 24 ulcers in the SOC group. The results showed significant healing rate of the LTAPP group, whether to be the wound size: wound area and wound volume, wound healing: exudate reduction, granulation and lesser necrotic tissue or Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) score. The LTAPP group had better bacterial load reduction without the use of tropical antibiotic, this also signified the quality in bacterial eradication of LTAPP.ConclusionLTAPP showed outstanding performance in treating pressure ulcer wounds. The LTAPP gave greater outcome in wound size, wound healing indicators, microbiological analyses and cost-effective comparison. Although, the absence of statistical significance, it did not affect the outcome trends. This study suggested further investigation of the potential role of LTAPP therapy in different wound types in near future.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":" ","pages":"15347346251323940"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Efficacy of Low-Temperature Atmospheric-Pressure Plasma (LTAPP) in the Multicenter Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Warangkana Tonaree, Sitthichoke Taweepraditpol, Natthapong Kongkunnavat, Nattanit Poungjantaradej, Boonyaporn Kotistienkul, Min Yongsuvimol, Kusuma Chinaroonchai, Pitawan Rachata, Pattana Ongkasuwan, Orawan Chansanti, Atthawit Mongkornwong, Chonlathorn Chaichote, Apirag Chuangsuwanich\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15347346251323940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>IntroductionThis study is to examine the reduction in wound size between the LTAPP and the control group and also investigate the wound healing effect factor.MethodsA randomized controlled trial was conducted at five study centers. Participated patients were between 18-80 years old who had pressure ulcer wound(s) and excluded patients with high risk or receiving other treatment such as previous radiation therapy in the affected area, pregnancy, sepsis, and immunocompromised host. The study divided participant into LTAPP group and standard of care (SOC) group, the LTAPP group would received a dressing of non-Ag materials and administer LTAPP for 1 min per 1 cm<sup>2</sup> (maximum of 20 min). The SOC group would received standard dressing wound protocol. Both groups would be followed until the end of study (ninth visit) or until the wound healed.ResultsWhen considering patients who attended follow-up ≥4 visits, only 45 ulcers were eligible, of which consisted of 21 ulcers in the LTAPP group and 24 ulcers in the SOC group. The results showed significant healing rate of the LTAPP group, whether to be the wound size: wound area and wound volume, wound healing: exudate reduction, granulation and lesser necrotic tissue or Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) score. The LTAPP group had better bacterial load reduction without the use of tropical antibiotic, this also signified the quality in bacterial eradication of LTAPP.ConclusionLTAPP showed outstanding performance in treating pressure ulcer wounds. The LTAPP gave greater outcome in wound size, wound healing indicators, microbiological analyses and cost-effective comparison. Although, the absence of statistical significance, it did not affect the outcome trends. This study suggested further investigation of the potential role of LTAPP therapy in different wound types in near future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The international journal of lower extremity wounds\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15347346251323940\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The international journal of lower extremity wounds\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346251323940\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346251323940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在观察LTAPP组与对照组之间创面面积的减少,并探讨创面愈合的影响因素。方法在5个研究中心进行随机对照试验。参与研究的患者年龄在18-80岁之间,有压疮创面,排除了高风险患者或接受过其他治疗的患者,如患区既往放射治疗、妊娠、败血症、宿主免疫功能低下等。研究将参与者分为LTAPP组和标准护理(SOC)组,LTAPP组接受非银材料敷料,每1 cm2给予LTAPP 1分钟(最长20分钟)。SOC组采用标准伤口敷料方案。两组患者都将被随访到研究结束(第九次访问)或直到伤口愈合。结果在随访≥4次的患者中,只有45例溃疡符合条件,其中LTAPP组21例,SOC组24例。结果显示,无论是创面大小、创面面积、创面体积、创面愈合程度、渗出物减少、肉芽及小坏死组织或压疮愈合评分,LTAPP组均有显著的愈合率。在不使用热带抗生素的情况下,LTAPP组的细菌负荷减少效果更好,这也说明了LTAPP的细菌根除质量。结论ltapp治疗压疮创面疗效显著。LTAPP在伤口大小、伤口愈合指标、微生物分析和成本效益比较方面取得了更好的结果。虽然没有统计学意义,但并不影响结局趋势。本研究建议在不久的将来进一步研究LTAPP治疗在不同类型伤口中的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Efficacy of Low-Temperature Atmospheric-Pressure Plasma (LTAPP) in the Multicenter Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IntroductionThis study is to examine the reduction in wound size between the LTAPP and the control group and also investigate the wound healing effect factor.MethodsA randomized controlled trial was conducted at five study centers. Participated patients were between 18-80 years old who had pressure ulcer wound(s) and excluded patients with high risk or receiving other treatment such as previous radiation therapy in the affected area, pregnancy, sepsis, and immunocompromised host. The study divided participant into LTAPP group and standard of care (SOC) group, the LTAPP group would received a dressing of non-Ag materials and administer LTAPP for 1 min per 1 cm2 (maximum of 20 min). The SOC group would received standard dressing wound protocol. Both groups would be followed until the end of study (ninth visit) or until the wound healed.ResultsWhen considering patients who attended follow-up ≥4 visits, only 45 ulcers were eligible, of which consisted of 21 ulcers in the LTAPP group and 24 ulcers in the SOC group. The results showed significant healing rate of the LTAPP group, whether to be the wound size: wound area and wound volume, wound healing: exudate reduction, granulation and lesser necrotic tissue or Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) score. The LTAPP group had better bacterial load reduction without the use of tropical antibiotic, this also signified the quality in bacterial eradication of LTAPP.ConclusionLTAPP showed outstanding performance in treating pressure ulcer wounds. The LTAPP gave greater outcome in wound size, wound healing indicators, microbiological analyses and cost-effective comparison. Although, the absence of statistical significance, it did not affect the outcome trends. This study suggested further investigation of the potential role of LTAPP therapy in different wound types in near future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信