旋后创伤后长方体和舟骨撕脱骨折的临床疗效。

Maarten P Cornelissen, Mirte I Muntel, Pieter B A A Van Driel, Roelina Munnik-Hagewoud, Rutger G Zuurmond
{"title":"旋后创伤后长方体和舟骨撕脱骨折的临床疗效。","authors":"Maarten P Cornelissen, Mirte I Muntel, Pieter B A A Van Driel, Roelina Munnik-Hagewoud, Rutger G Zuurmond","doi":"10.1177/19386400251321875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Supination trauma-related avulsion fractures of the foot are seen frequently, with cuboid and navicular fractures being among the most frequent types encountered. Nevertheless, the prognosis of these fractures remains largely unknown. This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the 2 most prevalent avulsion fractures-cuboid and navicular. A retrospective cohort consisting of patients who sustained a cuboid or navicular avulsion fracture after supination trauma between 2017 and 2020 was compiled and baseline characteristics along with retrospective data were collected. To gain data on clinical outcome 2 questionnaires, the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), were completed by participants 2 to 5 years after the fracture. Thirty-seven participants consented to participate, 25 experienced a cuboid fracture and 12 a navicular fracture. Cuboid fracture patients had a median week-average NRS score of 0 (range 0-7) and a median FAAM score of 105 (range 62-116), on average 40.8 months (SD 7.74) after treatment. Five out of 25 (21%) patients experienced persisting foot pain (NRS of ≥2). Navicular fracture patients had a median week-average NRS score of 1.5 (range 0-5) and a median FAAM score of 104 (range 55-116), a median 37.25 (range 27-47) months after treatment. Five out of 12 (42%) patients had a persisting NRS score of ≥2. Avulsion fractures of the cuboid and navicular bones generally have a favorable clinical outcome. However, a substantial portion of patients with both fracture types experienced persistent foot pain ≥24 months after the fracture.<b>Levels of Evidence:</b> Level II: Retrospective cohort study with prospective follow-up design.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"19386400251321875"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Outcomes of Avulsion Fractures of the Cuboid and Navicular After Supination Trauma.\",\"authors\":\"Maarten P Cornelissen, Mirte I Muntel, Pieter B A A Van Driel, Roelina Munnik-Hagewoud, Rutger G Zuurmond\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19386400251321875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Supination trauma-related avulsion fractures of the foot are seen frequently, with cuboid and navicular fractures being among the most frequent types encountered. Nevertheless, the prognosis of these fractures remains largely unknown. This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the 2 most prevalent avulsion fractures-cuboid and navicular. A retrospective cohort consisting of patients who sustained a cuboid or navicular avulsion fracture after supination trauma between 2017 and 2020 was compiled and baseline characteristics along with retrospective data were collected. To gain data on clinical outcome 2 questionnaires, the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), were completed by participants 2 to 5 years after the fracture. Thirty-seven participants consented to participate, 25 experienced a cuboid fracture and 12 a navicular fracture. Cuboid fracture patients had a median week-average NRS score of 0 (range 0-7) and a median FAAM score of 105 (range 62-116), on average 40.8 months (SD 7.74) after treatment. Five out of 25 (21%) patients experienced persisting foot pain (NRS of ≥2). Navicular fracture patients had a median week-average NRS score of 1.5 (range 0-5) and a median FAAM score of 104 (range 55-116), a median 37.25 (range 27-47) months after treatment. Five out of 12 (42%) patients had a persisting NRS score of ≥2. Avulsion fractures of the cuboid and navicular bones generally have a favorable clinical outcome. However, a substantial portion of patients with both fracture types experienced persistent foot pain ≥24 months after the fracture.<b>Levels of Evidence:</b> Level II: Retrospective cohort study with prospective follow-up design.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot & ankle specialist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"19386400251321875\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot & ankle specialist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400251321875\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400251321875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

足部的旋后创伤性撕脱骨折是常见的,其中长方体和舟状骨折是最常见的类型。然而,这些骨折的预后在很大程度上仍然未知。本研究旨在评估两种最常见的撕脱骨折-长方体骨折和舟状骨折的临床结果。回顾性分析了2017年至2020年间发生旋后创伤后长方体或舟状骨撕脱骨折的患者,并收集了基线特征和回顾性数据。为了获得临床结果调查问卷的数据,参与者在骨折后2至5年完成疼痛的数值评定量表(NRS)和足踝能力量表(FAAM)。37名参与者同意参加,25名经历了长方体骨折,12名经历了舟状骨折。长骨骨折患者治疗后平均40.8个月(SD 7.74),周平均NRS评分中位数为0(范围0-7),FAAM评分中位数为105(范围62-116)。25例患者中有5例(21%)经历了持续的足部疼痛(NRS≥2)。舟骨骨折患者的周平均NRS评分中位数为1.5(范围0-5),FAAM评分中位数为104(范围55-116),治疗后数月中位数为37.25(范围27-47)。12例患者中有5例(42%)持续NRS评分≥2。长方体骨和舟骨撕脱骨折通常有良好的临床结果。然而,有相当一部分两种骨折类型的患者在骨折后≥24个月出现持续性足部疼痛。证据水平:二级:前瞻性随访设计的回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Outcomes of Avulsion Fractures of the Cuboid and Navicular After Supination Trauma.

Supination trauma-related avulsion fractures of the foot are seen frequently, with cuboid and navicular fractures being among the most frequent types encountered. Nevertheless, the prognosis of these fractures remains largely unknown. This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the 2 most prevalent avulsion fractures-cuboid and navicular. A retrospective cohort consisting of patients who sustained a cuboid or navicular avulsion fracture after supination trauma between 2017 and 2020 was compiled and baseline characteristics along with retrospective data were collected. To gain data on clinical outcome 2 questionnaires, the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), were completed by participants 2 to 5 years after the fracture. Thirty-seven participants consented to participate, 25 experienced a cuboid fracture and 12 a navicular fracture. Cuboid fracture patients had a median week-average NRS score of 0 (range 0-7) and a median FAAM score of 105 (range 62-116), on average 40.8 months (SD 7.74) after treatment. Five out of 25 (21%) patients experienced persisting foot pain (NRS of ≥2). Navicular fracture patients had a median week-average NRS score of 1.5 (range 0-5) and a median FAAM score of 104 (range 55-116), a median 37.25 (range 27-47) months after treatment. Five out of 12 (42%) patients had a persisting NRS score of ≥2. Avulsion fractures of the cuboid and navicular bones generally have a favorable clinical outcome. However, a substantial portion of patients with both fracture types experienced persistent foot pain ≥24 months after the fracture.Levels of Evidence: Level II: Retrospective cohort study with prospective follow-up design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信