放疗头颈癌患者的骨放射性坏死发生率和种植体存活率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 0.9 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Mansour Gorjizad, Majid Aryannejad, Ali Shahriari, Mahsa Aslani Khiavi, Maedeh Barkhordari Dashtkhaki, Amirhossein Rigi, Zhina Mohamadi, Pouya Asgari, Shirindokht Shirazi, SeyedMehdi Ziaei, Mahsa Asadi Anar
{"title":"放疗头颈癌患者的骨放射性坏死发生率和种植体存活率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Mansour Gorjizad, Majid Aryannejad, Ali Shahriari, Mahsa Aslani Khiavi, Maedeh Barkhordari Dashtkhaki, Amirhossein Rigi, Zhina Mohamadi, Pouya Asgari, Shirindokht Shirazi, SeyedMehdi Ziaei, Mahsa Asadi Anar","doi":"10.1111/scd.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>The use of implants in irradiated patients has been critically questioned due to the presence of Osteoradionecrosis and other side effects of radiation therapy. Hence, our objective is to examine the likelihood of dental implant survival and the incidence of osteoradionecrosis in patients with head and neck cancer who have undergone radiation therapy. This analysis will aid in making informed therapeutic decisions on oral rehabilitation for individuals at high risk, ensuring maximal benefit.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were queried until April 2024. The digital data were extracted using the Web plot digitizer. We utilized the most recent iteration of STATA (version 18) to perform a meta-analysis of the data. The studies were evaluated for quality using the New Castle-Ottawa Scale. Egger's test was used to evaluate the presence of publication bias caused by modest research effects.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The study analyzed data from 21 research papers on 753 head and neck cancer patients. The majority were male, with a mean age of 60.25 years. 46% underwent radiotherapy, with 2261 dental implants inserted. The mandible was the most used implant site, accounting for 62.4%. The mean time between implant placement and radiotherapy was 5.3 weeks, with a median waiting period of 30.7 months for secondary surgery. After an average follow-up of 42.25 months, 58% of implants failed in the irradiated control group, while 6% failed in the non-irradiated control subgroup. Osteoradionecrosis was seen in 26 patients, resulting in an incident rate of 1.81%. As a result of this problem, an average of 2.5 implants per patient were not successfully retained. Radiotherapy was found to be a significant risk factor for implant survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our research indicates that the survival rate of implants in patients who have undergone radiation therapy is lower compared to those who have not received radiation therapy. Additionally, although rare, osteoradionecrosis is a significant complication that every oral and maxillofacial surgeon should be ready to address. Enhancing the quality of care, mitigating hazards, and reducing treatment duration may hinge upon implementing a systematic approach to patient selection and therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":47470,"journal":{"name":"Special Care in Dentistry","volume":"45 2","pages":"e70022"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Osteoradionecrosis Incidence and Dental Implant Survival in Irradiated Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mansour Gorjizad, Majid Aryannejad, Ali Shahriari, Mahsa Aslani Khiavi, Maedeh Barkhordari Dashtkhaki, Amirhossein Rigi, Zhina Mohamadi, Pouya Asgari, Shirindokht Shirazi, SeyedMehdi Ziaei, Mahsa Asadi Anar\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/scd.70022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>The use of implants in irradiated patients has been critically questioned due to the presence of Osteoradionecrosis and other side effects of radiation therapy. Hence, our objective is to examine the likelihood of dental implant survival and the incidence of osteoradionecrosis in patients with head and neck cancer who have undergone radiation therapy. This analysis will aid in making informed therapeutic decisions on oral rehabilitation for individuals at high risk, ensuring maximal benefit.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were queried until April 2024. The digital data were extracted using the Web plot digitizer. We utilized the most recent iteration of STATA (version 18) to perform a meta-analysis of the data. The studies were evaluated for quality using the New Castle-Ottawa Scale. Egger's test was used to evaluate the presence of publication bias caused by modest research effects.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The study analyzed data from 21 research papers on 753 head and neck cancer patients. The majority were male, with a mean age of 60.25 years. 46% underwent radiotherapy, with 2261 dental implants inserted. The mandible was the most used implant site, accounting for 62.4%. The mean time between implant placement and radiotherapy was 5.3 weeks, with a median waiting period of 30.7 months for secondary surgery. After an average follow-up of 42.25 months, 58% of implants failed in the irradiated control group, while 6% failed in the non-irradiated control subgroup. Osteoradionecrosis was seen in 26 patients, resulting in an incident rate of 1.81%. As a result of this problem, an average of 2.5 implants per patient were not successfully retained. Radiotherapy was found to be a significant risk factor for implant survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our research indicates that the survival rate of implants in patients who have undergone radiation therapy is lower compared to those who have not received radiation therapy. Additionally, although rare, osteoradionecrosis is a significant complication that every oral and maxillofacial surgeon should be ready to address. Enhancing the quality of care, mitigating hazards, and reducing treatment duration may hinge upon implementing a systematic approach to patient selection and therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Special Care in Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"45 2\",\"pages\":\"e70022\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Special Care in Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/scd.70022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Special Care in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/scd.70022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:由于存在放射性骨坏死和放射治疗的其他副作用,植入物在放疗患者中的使用受到了严格的质疑。因此,我们的目的是研究接受放射治疗的头颈癌患者种植体存活的可能性和骨放射性坏死的发生率。这一分析将有助于为高危人群做出明智的口腔康复治疗决定,确保最大的效益。方法:截止2024年4月,查询PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science。利用网络图数字化仪提取数字数据。我们利用STATA的最新迭代(版本18)来执行数据的元分析。研究的质量用新堡-渥太华量表进行评估。Egger检验用于评估由适度研究效应引起的发表偏倚的存在。结果:该研究分析了21篇关于753名头颈癌患者的研究论文的数据。其中男性居多,平均年龄60.25岁。46%的患者接受了放射治疗,种植了2261颗牙。下颌种植最多,占62.4%。植入和放疗之间的平均时间为5.3周,二次手术的中位等待时间为30.7个月。平均随访42.25个月后,放疗对照组58%的种植体失败,而未放疗对照组6%的种植体失败。放射性骨坏死26例,发生率为1.81%。由于这个问题,每个患者平均有2.5个植入物没有成功保留。放疗是影响种植体存活的重要危险因素。结论:我们的研究表明,与未接受放射治疗的患者相比,接受放射治疗的患者种植体的存活率较低。此外,虽然罕见,但放射性骨坏死是一个重要的并发症,每个口腔颌面外科医生都应该准备好解决。提高护理质量、减轻危害和缩短治疗时间可能取决于对患者选择和治疗实施系统的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Osteoradionecrosis Incidence and Dental Implant Survival in Irradiated Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background and aim: The use of implants in irradiated patients has been critically questioned due to the presence of Osteoradionecrosis and other side effects of radiation therapy. Hence, our objective is to examine the likelihood of dental implant survival and the incidence of osteoradionecrosis in patients with head and neck cancer who have undergone radiation therapy. This analysis will aid in making informed therapeutic decisions on oral rehabilitation for individuals at high risk, ensuring maximal benefit.

Method: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were queried until April 2024. The digital data were extracted using the Web plot digitizer. We utilized the most recent iteration of STATA (version 18) to perform a meta-analysis of the data. The studies were evaluated for quality using the New Castle-Ottawa Scale. Egger's test was used to evaluate the presence of publication bias caused by modest research effects.

Result: The study analyzed data from 21 research papers on 753 head and neck cancer patients. The majority were male, with a mean age of 60.25 years. 46% underwent radiotherapy, with 2261 dental implants inserted. The mandible was the most used implant site, accounting for 62.4%. The mean time between implant placement and radiotherapy was 5.3 weeks, with a median waiting period of 30.7 months for secondary surgery. After an average follow-up of 42.25 months, 58% of implants failed in the irradiated control group, while 6% failed in the non-irradiated control subgroup. Osteoradionecrosis was seen in 26 patients, resulting in an incident rate of 1.81%. As a result of this problem, an average of 2.5 implants per patient were not successfully retained. Radiotherapy was found to be a significant risk factor for implant survival.

Conclusion: Our research indicates that the survival rate of implants in patients who have undergone radiation therapy is lower compared to those who have not received radiation therapy. Additionally, although rare, osteoradionecrosis is a significant complication that every oral and maxillofacial surgeon should be ready to address. Enhancing the quality of care, mitigating hazards, and reducing treatment duration may hinge upon implementing a systematic approach to patient selection and therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Special Care in Dentistry
Special Care in Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: Special Care in Dentistry is the official journal of the Special Care Dentistry Association, the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for Persons with Disabilities, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry. It is the only journal published in North America devoted to improving oral health in people with special needs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信