为医疗保健专业人员提供国家资助的临床学术培训奖励的不平等:英国四个国家的定量比较。

IF 2 Q2 NURSING
Andy Peters, Heather Cameron, Scott Cunningham, Susan Dawkes, Jayne Donaldson, Liz Hughes, Jan Savinc, Juliet MacArthur
{"title":"为医疗保健专业人员提供国家资助的临床学术培训奖励的不平等:英国四个国家的定量比较。","authors":"Andy Peters, Heather Cameron, Scott Cunningham, Susan Dawkes, Jayne Donaldson, Liz Hughes, Jan Savinc, Juliet MacArthur","doi":"10.1177/17449871241291947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a common perception that investment in clinical academic training awards for healthcare professions (not medicine and dentistry) in England outweighs that in the devolved nations (Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland) of the United Kingdom.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to evaluate this perception by gathering data on the number of such awards made and the level of associated expenditure by each of the nations during 2017-2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Freedom of Information requests were sent to government agencies that provide nationally funded clinical academic training awards in each UK nation. Data on the number of awards provided, the whole time equivalent salaries and durations applicable and the expenditures entailed in the period 2017-2022 were broken down into six levels of training, from internship through to post-doctoral. Standardised per capita comparisons were made between nations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Large differences were found between nations. Only England provided awards in all categories. Wales made the most awards per capita. Scotland invested less than a sixth of that spent by England per capita and under half of that spent by Wales or Northern Ireland.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Strategic approaches focusing on opportunities across the whole career pathway, particularly in the devolved nations, are recommended to achieve cross-national parity.</p>","PeriodicalId":47172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"17449871241291947"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11910738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inequalities of provision of nationally funded clinical academic training awards for healthcare professionals: quantitative comparisons across the four nations of the UK.\",\"authors\":\"Andy Peters, Heather Cameron, Scott Cunningham, Susan Dawkes, Jayne Donaldson, Liz Hughes, Jan Savinc, Juliet MacArthur\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17449871241291947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a common perception that investment in clinical academic training awards for healthcare professions (not medicine and dentistry) in England outweighs that in the devolved nations (Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland) of the United Kingdom.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to evaluate this perception by gathering data on the number of such awards made and the level of associated expenditure by each of the nations during 2017-2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Freedom of Information requests were sent to government agencies that provide nationally funded clinical academic training awards in each UK nation. Data on the number of awards provided, the whole time equivalent salaries and durations applicable and the expenditures entailed in the period 2017-2022 were broken down into six levels of training, from internship through to post-doctoral. Standardised per capita comparisons were made between nations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Large differences were found between nations. Only England provided awards in all categories. Wales made the most awards per capita. Scotland invested less than a sixth of that spent by England per capita and under half of that spent by Wales or Northern Ireland.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Strategic approaches focusing on opportunities across the whole career pathway, particularly in the devolved nations, are recommended to achieve cross-national parity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17449871241291947\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11910738/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871241291947\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871241291947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人们普遍认为,英格兰对医疗保健专业(不是医学和牙科)临床学术培训奖励的投资超过了英国的下放国家(苏格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰)。目的:我们旨在通过收集2017-2022年期间每个国家颁发的此类奖项数量和相关支出水平的数据来评估这种看法。方法:信息自由的请求被发送到每个英国国家提供国家资助临床学术培训奖励的政府机构。关于2017-2022年期间提供的奖励数量、整个时间等效工资和适用期限以及所需支出的数据被分为六个级别的培训,从实习到博士后。各国之间进行了标准化的人均比较。结果:不同国家之间存在较大差异。只有英国提供了所有类别的奖项。威尔士人均获奖最多。苏格兰的人均投资额不到英格兰的六分之一,不到威尔士或北爱尔兰的一半。结论:建议采取战略方针,重点关注整个职业道路上的机会,特别是在权力下放的国家,以实现跨国平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inequalities of provision of nationally funded clinical academic training awards for healthcare professionals: quantitative comparisons across the four nations of the UK.

Background: There is a common perception that investment in clinical academic training awards for healthcare professions (not medicine and dentistry) in England outweighs that in the devolved nations (Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland) of the United Kingdom.

Aims: We aimed to evaluate this perception by gathering data on the number of such awards made and the level of associated expenditure by each of the nations during 2017-2022.

Methods: Freedom of Information requests were sent to government agencies that provide nationally funded clinical academic training awards in each UK nation. Data on the number of awards provided, the whole time equivalent salaries and durations applicable and the expenditures entailed in the period 2017-2022 were broken down into six levels of training, from internship through to post-doctoral. Standardised per capita comparisons were made between nations.

Results: Large differences were found between nations. Only England provided awards in all categories. Wales made the most awards per capita. Scotland invested less than a sixth of that spent by England per capita and under half of that spent by Wales or Northern Ireland.

Conclusions: Strategic approaches focusing on opportunities across the whole career pathway, particularly in the devolved nations, are recommended to achieve cross-national parity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research in Nursing is a leading peer reviewed journal that blends good research with contemporary debates about policy and practice. The Journal of Research in Nursing contributes knowledge to nursing practice, research and local, national and international health and social care policy. Each issue contains a variety of papers and review commentaries within a specific theme. The editors are advised and supported by a board of key academics, practitioners and policy makers of international standing. The Journal of Research in Nursing will: • Ensure an evidence base to your practice and policy development • Inform your research work at an advanced level • Challenge you to critically reflect on the interface between practice, policy and research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信