Mark Guadagnoli, Whitney Elks, Kencie Ely, Abigail W Cheng, Kavita Batra, Charles Randolph St Hill
{"title":"“好,更好,如何”教育干预:在普外科应用反馈的潜在益处一项教育干预的顺序混合方法研究。","authors":"Mark Guadagnoli, Whitney Elks, Kencie Ely, Abigail W Cheng, Kavita Batra, Charles Randolph St Hill","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S487038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Feedback is acknowledged as a necessity for effective learning and performance improvement. However, it has been shown to have variable effects on subsequent performance. This study introduces the \"Good, Better, How\" (GBH) framework for providing and receiving effective feedback in surgical training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surgery residents, fellows and faculty at a single institution completed pre- and post-educational intervention surveys, attended a GBH educational intervention, and participated in focus groups. Survey results were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survey analysis showed significant (p<0.05) positive changes from using the GBH method, and rated the GBH method very favorably (average score: 8.03/10), suggesting a positive paradigm shift from previous feedback methods used in surgical education. Dominant focus group themes included phrases such as \"positive culture\", \"systematic\", and \"useful\".</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite implementation challenges, the GBH feedback system shows promise for enhancing surgical education and may contribute to improved patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"16 ","pages":"381-398"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11910930/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Good, Better, How\\\" Educational Intervention: Potential Benefits of Utilizing Feedback in General Surgery; Sequential Mixed-Methods Study of an Educational Intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Mark Guadagnoli, Whitney Elks, Kencie Ely, Abigail W Cheng, Kavita Batra, Charles Randolph St Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/AMEP.S487038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Feedback is acknowledged as a necessity for effective learning and performance improvement. However, it has been shown to have variable effects on subsequent performance. This study introduces the \\\"Good, Better, How\\\" (GBH) framework for providing and receiving effective feedback in surgical training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surgery residents, fellows and faculty at a single institution completed pre- and post-educational intervention surveys, attended a GBH educational intervention, and participated in focus groups. Survey results were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survey analysis showed significant (p<0.05) positive changes from using the GBH method, and rated the GBH method very favorably (average score: 8.03/10), suggesting a positive paradigm shift from previous feedback methods used in surgical education. Dominant focus group themes included phrases such as \\\"positive culture\\\", \\\"systematic\\\", and \\\"useful\\\".</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite implementation challenges, the GBH feedback system shows promise for enhancing surgical education and may contribute to improved patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"381-398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11910930/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S487038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S487038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
"Good, Better, How" Educational Intervention: Potential Benefits of Utilizing Feedback in General Surgery; Sequential Mixed-Methods Study of an Educational Intervention.
Background: Feedback is acknowledged as a necessity for effective learning and performance improvement. However, it has been shown to have variable effects on subsequent performance. This study introduces the "Good, Better, How" (GBH) framework for providing and receiving effective feedback in surgical training.
Methods: Surgery residents, fellows and faculty at a single institution completed pre- and post-educational intervention surveys, attended a GBH educational intervention, and participated in focus groups. Survey results were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively.
Results: Survey analysis showed significant (p<0.05) positive changes from using the GBH method, and rated the GBH method very favorably (average score: 8.03/10), suggesting a positive paradigm shift from previous feedback methods used in surgical education. Dominant focus group themes included phrases such as "positive culture", "systematic", and "useful".
Conclusion: Despite implementation challenges, the GBH feedback system shows promise for enhancing surgical education and may contribute to improved patient outcomes.