超越人格障碍:对DSM-6的挑战。

Q4 Psychology
Jacob E Perlson, Claire Koljack, Jack Drescher, Deborah L Cabaniss
{"title":"超越人格障碍:对DSM-6的挑战。","authors":"Jacob E Perlson, Claire Koljack, Jack Drescher, Deborah L Cabaniss","doi":"10.1521/pdps.2025.53.1.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The authors argue that as a diagnostic category \"personality disorders\" falls short in offering helpful counsel to patients with difficulties in self and interpersonal functioning. The article begins with a discussion of <i>symptom</i> versus <i>disorder</i> in general medicine before critiquing the impulse of psychiatrists and humans more broadly to categorize and sort. The authors summarize well-described limitations to categorical personality disorder diagnoses, including their questionable clinical utility, unsteady empirical support, and potential to reify myriad forms of stigma. These limitations emphasize the multidimensionality of personality and bring attention to the potential harms of offering patients diagnoses so laden in negative judgements, particularly when working with minoritized patient populations. The authors advocate for a reconsidered dimensional approach that may be emphasized in future editions of the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i> (DSM).</p>","PeriodicalId":38518,"journal":{"name":"Psychodynamic Psychiatry","volume":"53 1","pages":"22-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moving beyond Personality Disorders: A Challenge for the <i>DSM-6</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Jacob E Perlson, Claire Koljack, Jack Drescher, Deborah L Cabaniss\",\"doi\":\"10.1521/pdps.2025.53.1.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The authors argue that as a diagnostic category \\\"personality disorders\\\" falls short in offering helpful counsel to patients with difficulties in self and interpersonal functioning. The article begins with a discussion of <i>symptom</i> versus <i>disorder</i> in general medicine before critiquing the impulse of psychiatrists and humans more broadly to categorize and sort. The authors summarize well-described limitations to categorical personality disorder diagnoses, including their questionable clinical utility, unsteady empirical support, and potential to reify myriad forms of stigma. These limitations emphasize the multidimensionality of personality and bring attention to the potential harms of offering patients diagnoses so laden in negative judgements, particularly when working with minoritized patient populations. The authors advocate for a reconsidered dimensional approach that may be emphasized in future editions of the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i> (DSM).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychodynamic Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"22-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychodynamic Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1521/pdps.2025.53.1.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychodynamic Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pdps.2025.53.1.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作者认为,作为一种诊断类别,“人格障碍”在为自我和人际功能困难的患者提供有益的咨询方面存在不足。这篇文章首先讨论了一般医学中的症状与紊乱,然后对精神科医生和人类更广泛地进行分类和排序的冲动进行了批评。作者总结了分类人格障碍诊断的局限性,包括其可疑的临床效用,不稳定的经验支持,以及将无数形式的耻辱具体化的可能性。这些限制强调了人格的多维性,并引起了人们对向患者提供如此充满负面判断的诊断的潜在危害的关注,特别是在与少数患者群体合作时。作者主张重新考虑维度方法,这可能会在精神疾病诊断和统计手册(DSM)的未来版本中得到强调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moving beyond Personality Disorders: A Challenge for the DSM-6.

The authors argue that as a diagnostic category "personality disorders" falls short in offering helpful counsel to patients with difficulties in self and interpersonal functioning. The article begins with a discussion of symptom versus disorder in general medicine before critiquing the impulse of psychiatrists and humans more broadly to categorize and sort. The authors summarize well-described limitations to categorical personality disorder diagnoses, including their questionable clinical utility, unsteady empirical support, and potential to reify myriad forms of stigma. These limitations emphasize the multidimensionality of personality and bring attention to the potential harms of offering patients diagnoses so laden in negative judgements, particularly when working with minoritized patient populations. The authors advocate for a reconsidered dimensional approach that may be emphasized in future editions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychodynamic Psychiatry
Psychodynamic Psychiatry Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信