脉冲磁场治疗新冠肺炎后疲劳综合征的可行性、可接受性及效果:一项随机对照先导研究

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mohammad Keilani, Margarete Steiner, Julia Sternik, Jim Schmeckenbecher, Ralf Harun Zwick, Barbara Wagner, Richard Crevenna
{"title":"脉冲磁场治疗新冠肺炎后疲劳综合征的可行性、可接受性及效果:一项随机对照先导研究","authors":"Mohammad Keilani, Margarete Steiner, Julia Sternik, Jim Schmeckenbecher, Ralf Harun Zwick, Barbara Wagner, Richard Crevenna","doi":"10.1007/s00508-025-02522-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled pilot study was to explore the feasibility, acceptance and effects of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) in patients with post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 20 patients were included in the study. They were randomly assigned to an intervention group (n = 10, male:female = 4 : 5, age = 45 ± 9 years) and a placebo group (n = 10, m:f = 4:6, age: 39 ± 23 years). A Papimi™ Delta professional electromagnetic field therapy device was used for treatment. Controls received a placebo PEMF. In total 10 PEMF sessions (30 min., 2× per week) were applied. Physical performance, health-related quality of life, fatigue, work ability, sleep, pain, anxiety and depression were assessed at baseline, posttreatment and at follow-up 5 weeks after treatment. Feasibility and acceptance were assessed posttreatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention group showed a notable improvement in the 6 minutes walking test. The use of PEMF improved fatigue (measured with the Brief Fatigue Inventory and the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory). Also, the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Insomnia Severity Index, the Work Ability Index and most subscales of the Short Form (SF) 36 questionnaire showed improvement. From the placebo group three patients dropped out. There were no drop-outs in the intervention group. In the intervention group, PEMF was well-accepted and patients showed very good adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this pilot study indicate that PEMF is feasible and well accepted. Furthermore, this study population showed improvements in physical and mental health in the intervention group. This study is a promising contribution to this growing research field and provides the required evidence for future efficacy studies on PEMF for post-COVID-19 patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23861,"journal":{"name":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility, acceptance and effects of pulsed magnetic field therapy in patients with post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome : A randomized controlled pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Keilani, Margarete Steiner, Julia Sternik, Jim Schmeckenbecher, Ralf Harun Zwick, Barbara Wagner, Richard Crevenna\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00508-025-02522-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled pilot study was to explore the feasibility, acceptance and effects of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) in patients with post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 20 patients were included in the study. They were randomly assigned to an intervention group (n = 10, male:female = 4 : 5, age = 45 ± 9 years) and a placebo group (n = 10, m:f = 4:6, age: 39 ± 23 years). A Papimi™ Delta professional electromagnetic field therapy device was used for treatment. Controls received a placebo PEMF. In total 10 PEMF sessions (30 min., 2× per week) were applied. Physical performance, health-related quality of life, fatigue, work ability, sleep, pain, anxiety and depression were assessed at baseline, posttreatment and at follow-up 5 weeks after treatment. Feasibility and acceptance were assessed posttreatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention group showed a notable improvement in the 6 minutes walking test. The use of PEMF improved fatigue (measured with the Brief Fatigue Inventory and the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory). Also, the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Insomnia Severity Index, the Work Ability Index and most subscales of the Short Form (SF) 36 questionnaire showed improvement. From the placebo group three patients dropped out. There were no drop-outs in the intervention group. In the intervention group, PEMF was well-accepted and patients showed very good adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this pilot study indicate that PEMF is feasible and well accepted. Furthermore, this study population showed improvements in physical and mental health in the intervention group. This study is a promising contribution to this growing research field and provides the required evidence for future efficacy studies on PEMF for post-COVID-19 patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-025-02522-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-025-02522-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨脉冲电磁场治疗(PEMF)治疗新冠肺炎后疲劳综合征患者的可行性、可接受性及疗效。方法:共纳入20例患者。他们被随机分配到干预组(n = 10,男:女 = 4 :5岁 = 45 ± 9年)和安慰剂组(n = 10 m: f = 4:6,年龄:39 ±23年)。使用Papimi™Delta专业电磁场治疗仪进行治疗。对照组接受安慰剂性PEMF。总共10次(30次 分钟)。,每周2次)。在基线、治疗后和治疗后5周随访时评估身体表现、健康相关生活质量、疲劳、工作能力、睡眠、疼痛、焦虑和抑郁。处理后评估可行性和可接受性。结果:干预组在6分钟步行测试中有明显改善。PEMF的使用改善了疲劳(使用简短疲劳清单和多维疲劳清单进行测量)。医院焦虑抑郁量表抑郁分量表、失眠严重程度指数、工作能力指数及SF - 36问卷大部分分量表均有改善。安慰剂组中有3名患者退出。在干预组中没有人退出。在干预组中,PEMF被广泛接受,患者表现出很好的依从性。结论:本初步研究结果表明,PEMF是可行的,并被广泛接受。此外,该研究人群在干预组中表现出身体和心理健康的改善。该研究为这一不断发展的研究领域做出了有希望的贡献,并为未来PEMF对covid -19后患者的疗效研究提供了所需的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility, acceptance and effects of pulsed magnetic field therapy in patients with post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome : A randomized controlled pilot study.

Introduction: The aim of this randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled pilot study was to explore the feasibility, acceptance and effects of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) in patients with post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome.

Methods: A total of 20 patients were included in the study. They were randomly assigned to an intervention group (n = 10, male:female = 4 : 5, age = 45 ± 9 years) and a placebo group (n = 10, m:f = 4:6, age: 39 ± 23 years). A Papimi™ Delta professional electromagnetic field therapy device was used for treatment. Controls received a placebo PEMF. In total 10 PEMF sessions (30 min., 2× per week) were applied. Physical performance, health-related quality of life, fatigue, work ability, sleep, pain, anxiety and depression were assessed at baseline, posttreatment and at follow-up 5 weeks after treatment. Feasibility and acceptance were assessed posttreatment.

Results: The intervention group showed a notable improvement in the 6 minutes walking test. The use of PEMF improved fatigue (measured with the Brief Fatigue Inventory and the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory). Also, the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Insomnia Severity Index, the Work Ability Index and most subscales of the Short Form (SF) 36 questionnaire showed improvement. From the placebo group three patients dropped out. There were no drop-outs in the intervention group. In the intervention group, PEMF was well-accepted and patients showed very good adherence.

Conclusion: The results of this pilot study indicate that PEMF is feasible and well accepted. Furthermore, this study population showed improvements in physical and mental health in the intervention group. This study is a promising contribution to this growing research field and provides the required evidence for future efficacy studies on PEMF for post-COVID-19 patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
110
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is an international scientific medical journal covering the entire spectrum of clinical medicine and related areas such as ethics in medicine, public health and the history of medicine. In addition to original articles, the Journal features editorials and leading articles on newly emerging topics, review articles, case reports and a broad range of special articles. Experimental material will be considered for publication if it is directly relevant to clinical medicine. The number of international contributions has been steadily increasing. Consequently, the international reputation of the journal has grown in the past several years. Founded in 1888, the Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is certainly one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world and takes pride in having been the first publisher of landmarks in medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信