[关于听觉脑干反应(ABR)和听觉稳态反应(ASSR)记录结果不一致的可能原因]。

Q3 Medicine
A V Pashkov, L S Namazova-Baranova, N V Ustinova, I V Naumova, M T Fatakhova, K I Voevodina, A E Pashkova, V I Popadyuk, V G Kunitsyna, P A Rubinshtein
{"title":"[关于听觉脑干反应(ABR)和听觉稳态反应(ASSR)记录结果不一致的可能原因]。","authors":"A V Pashkov, L S Namazova-Baranova, N V Ustinova, I V Naumova, M T Fatakhova, K I Voevodina, A E Pashkova, V I Popadyuk, V G Kunitsyna, P A Rubinshtein","doi":"10.17116/otorino20259001164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and auditory steady-state responses (ASSR) are the most widely used tests for objective hearing assessment. These tests are included in clinical guidelines for sensorineural hearing loss and other protocols. The literature sources describe examples of inconsistency between the results of these two tests, which are suggested to be interpreted in favor of ABR as the test with the highest values of sensitivity and specificity. Also, in a number of cases, discrepancy between the results of ABR and ASSR recordings in patients with neurological pathology was revealed. Given the expanding indications for auditory evoked potentials recording in groups of patients with neurological or psychiatric pathologies (for example, ABR and ASSR are recommended for use in clinical guidelines for the management of patients with autism spectrum disorders in 2020), an attempt has been made to assess the diagnostic value of these research methods in relation to conditions unrelated to hearing impairment.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A diagnostic search of domestic and foreign literature was conducted on the combined interpretation of the results of ABR and ASSR recording was carried out. Literature on the use of these tests in groups of patients without sensorineural hearing loss was also reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review includes the results of a literature search that provides a comparative analysis of ABR and ASSR results, including in patients with neurologic/psychiatric pathology. The analysis showed that ASSR recording results may significantly differ from the ABR response, which should be taken into account in patients with comorbidities.</p>","PeriodicalId":23575,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik otorinolaringologii","volume":"90 1","pages":"64-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[On possible causes of discrepancy between the results of auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and auditory steady-state responses (ASSR) recordings].\",\"authors\":\"A V Pashkov, L S Namazova-Baranova, N V Ustinova, I V Naumova, M T Fatakhova, K I Voevodina, A E Pashkova, V I Popadyuk, V G Kunitsyna, P A Rubinshtein\",\"doi\":\"10.17116/otorino20259001164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and auditory steady-state responses (ASSR) are the most widely used tests for objective hearing assessment. These tests are included in clinical guidelines for sensorineural hearing loss and other protocols. The literature sources describe examples of inconsistency between the results of these two tests, which are suggested to be interpreted in favor of ABR as the test with the highest values of sensitivity and specificity. Also, in a number of cases, discrepancy between the results of ABR and ASSR recordings in patients with neurological pathology was revealed. Given the expanding indications for auditory evoked potentials recording in groups of patients with neurological or psychiatric pathologies (for example, ABR and ASSR are recommended for use in clinical guidelines for the management of patients with autism spectrum disorders in 2020), an attempt has been made to assess the diagnostic value of these research methods in relation to conditions unrelated to hearing impairment.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A diagnostic search of domestic and foreign literature was conducted on the combined interpretation of the results of ABR and ASSR recording was carried out. Literature on the use of these tests in groups of patients without sensorineural hearing loss was also reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review includes the results of a literature search that provides a comparative analysis of ABR and ASSR results, including in patients with neurologic/psychiatric pathology. The analysis showed that ASSR recording results may significantly differ from the ABR response, which should be taken into account in patients with comorbidities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik otorinolaringologii\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"64-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik otorinolaringologii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino20259001164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik otorinolaringologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino20259001164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

听觉脑干反应(ABR)和听觉稳态反应(ASSR)是最广泛应用的客观听力评估测试。这些测试已被纳入感音神经性听力损失的临床指南和其他方案中。文献资料描述了这两种测试结果不一致的例子,建议将其解释为 ABR 的灵敏度和特异性值最高。此外,在一些病例中,发现神经系统病变患者的 ABR 和 ASSR 记录结果不一致。鉴于在神经或精神疾病患者群体中记录听觉诱发电位的适应症不断扩大(例如,2020 年自闭症谱系障碍患者管理临床指南中建议使用 ABR 和 ASSR),我们尝试评估这些研究方法在与听力障碍无关的情况下的诊断价值:就 ABR 和 ASSR 记录结果的综合解释对国内外文献进行了诊断检索。此外,还查阅了在无感音神经性听力损失的患者群体中使用这些测试的文献:综述包括文献检索结果,其中对 ABR 和 ASSR 结果进行了比较分析,包括神经/精神疾病患者。分析结果表明,ASSR 记录结果可能与 ABR 反应有显著差异,有合并症的患者应考虑到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[On possible causes of discrepancy between the results of auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and auditory steady-state responses (ASSR) recordings].

Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and auditory steady-state responses (ASSR) are the most widely used tests for objective hearing assessment. These tests are included in clinical guidelines for sensorineural hearing loss and other protocols. The literature sources describe examples of inconsistency between the results of these two tests, which are suggested to be interpreted in favor of ABR as the test with the highest values of sensitivity and specificity. Also, in a number of cases, discrepancy between the results of ABR and ASSR recordings in patients with neurological pathology was revealed. Given the expanding indications for auditory evoked potentials recording in groups of patients with neurological or psychiatric pathologies (for example, ABR and ASSR are recommended for use in clinical guidelines for the management of patients with autism spectrum disorders in 2020), an attempt has been made to assess the diagnostic value of these research methods in relation to conditions unrelated to hearing impairment.

Material and methods: A diagnostic search of domestic and foreign literature was conducted on the combined interpretation of the results of ABR and ASSR recording was carried out. Literature on the use of these tests in groups of patients without sensorineural hearing loss was also reviewed.

Results: The review includes the results of a literature search that provides a comparative analysis of ABR and ASSR results, including in patients with neurologic/psychiatric pathology. The analysis showed that ASSR recording results may significantly differ from the ABR response, which should be taken into account in patients with comorbidities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vestnik otorinolaringologii
Vestnik otorinolaringologii Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信