评估natalizumab在多发性硬化症的一线和后期使用:美国索赔数据库分析。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders Pub Date : 2025-03-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562864251317949
Robin L Avila, Nicole S Croteau, Fei Tang, Jason C Simeone, Khalil Jomaa, Boyang Bian, Mattia Gianinazzi
{"title":"评估natalizumab在多发性硬化症的一线和后期使用:美国索赔数据库分析。","authors":"Robin L Avila, Nicole S Croteau, Fei Tang, Jason C Simeone, Khalil Jomaa, Boyang Bian, Mattia Gianinazzi","doi":"10.1177/17562864251317949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited information exists on the healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) associated with real-world natalizumab used as a first-line (1L) versus later-line (2L+) treatment in multiple sclerosis (MS).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe natalizumab use in newly diagnosed MS patients treated as 1L or 2L+ and evaluate unadjusted annualized relapse rates (ARR) and MS-related HCRU before and after treatment initiation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This retrospective observational study utilized Komodo Health Sentinel claims data from October 2015 to August 2022. The study included adults diagnosed with incident MS who initiated natalizumab treatment, with insurance coverage for at least 12 months before diagnosis and 24 months after. The index date was the first natalizumab claim on or after the diagnosis. Baseline was defined as the 365 days prior to the index date, truncated at the time of diagnosis. Follow-up ended at the earliest occurrence of death, insurance disenrollment, treatment discontinuation (gap ⩾45 days), switch to another disease-modifying therapy before natalizumab discontinuation, or study end.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relapses and HCRU were assessed using person-time methods to account for varying follow-up times. Relapses were identified using a validated claims-based algorithm, and time to first relapse was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Hazard ratios for relapse were estimated using univariate Cox models. Mean differences (MD) in HCRU between baseline and follow-up and between 1L and 2L+ treatment groups were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1174 patients in the 1L group (mean age 39.0, 72.0% female) and 394 in the 2L+ group (mean age 39.7, 79.4% female) were included. Patients in the 1L group had a significantly higher baseline ARR (1.48 vs 0.92, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and lower on-treatment ARR (0.28 vs 0.41 for 2L+, <i>p</i> < 0.001). HCRU decreased significantly in the 1L group from baseline to follow-up: hospitalizations (MD 17.01 visits/year), length of stay (LOS; MD 20.96 days/year), emergency room visits (MD 9.83 visits/year), non-natalizumab outpatient visits (MD 12.11 visits/year) and long-term care facility stays (MD 22.18 days/year, <i>p</i> = 0.002). The 1L group showed greater reductions in inpatient visits (MD 10.01 visits//year), LOS (MD 16.73 days/year) and non-natalizumab outpatient visits (MD 11.64 visits/year) compared to the 2L+ group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Natalizumab as a first-line treatment was associated with greater reductions in ARR and MS-related HCRU compared to later-line use.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562864251317949"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912164/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating natalizumab first-line and later-line use in multiple sclerosis: a US claims database analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Robin L Avila, Nicole S Croteau, Fei Tang, Jason C Simeone, Khalil Jomaa, Boyang Bian, Mattia Gianinazzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17562864251317949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited information exists on the healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) associated with real-world natalizumab used as a first-line (1L) versus later-line (2L+) treatment in multiple sclerosis (MS).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe natalizumab use in newly diagnosed MS patients treated as 1L or 2L+ and evaluate unadjusted annualized relapse rates (ARR) and MS-related HCRU before and after treatment initiation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This retrospective observational study utilized Komodo Health Sentinel claims data from October 2015 to August 2022. The study included adults diagnosed with incident MS who initiated natalizumab treatment, with insurance coverage for at least 12 months before diagnosis and 24 months after. The index date was the first natalizumab claim on or after the diagnosis. Baseline was defined as the 365 days prior to the index date, truncated at the time of diagnosis. Follow-up ended at the earliest occurrence of death, insurance disenrollment, treatment discontinuation (gap ⩾45 days), switch to another disease-modifying therapy before natalizumab discontinuation, or study end.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relapses and HCRU were assessed using person-time methods to account for varying follow-up times. Relapses were identified using a validated claims-based algorithm, and time to first relapse was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Hazard ratios for relapse were estimated using univariate Cox models. Mean differences (MD) in HCRU between baseline and follow-up and between 1L and 2L+ treatment groups were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1174 patients in the 1L group (mean age 39.0, 72.0% female) and 394 in the 2L+ group (mean age 39.7, 79.4% female) were included. Patients in the 1L group had a significantly higher baseline ARR (1.48 vs 0.92, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and lower on-treatment ARR (0.28 vs 0.41 for 2L+, <i>p</i> < 0.001). HCRU decreased significantly in the 1L group from baseline to follow-up: hospitalizations (MD 17.01 visits/year), length of stay (LOS; MD 20.96 days/year), emergency room visits (MD 9.83 visits/year), non-natalizumab outpatient visits (MD 12.11 visits/year) and long-term care facility stays (MD 22.18 days/year, <i>p</i> = 0.002). The 1L group showed greater reductions in inpatient visits (MD 10.01 visits//year), LOS (MD 16.73 days/year) and non-natalizumab outpatient visits (MD 11.64 visits/year) compared to the 2L+ group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Natalizumab as a first-line treatment was associated with greater reductions in ARR and MS-related HCRU compared to later-line use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"17562864251317949\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912164/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864251317949\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864251317949","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在现实世界中,natalizumab作为一线(1L)与二线(2L+)治疗多发性硬化症(MS)的医疗资源利用率(HCRU)相关的信息有限。目的:描述natalizumab在接受1L或2L+治疗的新诊断MS患者中的使用情况,并评估治疗开始前后的未调整年化复发率(ARR)和MS相关HCRU。设计:这项回顾性观察性研究利用了2015年10月至2022年8月的科莫多健康哨兵索赔数据。该研究包括被诊断为突发多发性硬化症的成年人,他们开始了natalizumab治疗,在诊断前和诊断后至少有12个月的保险覆盖。索引日期是在诊断时或诊断后的第一次natalizumab索赔。基线定义为指标日期前365天,在诊断时截断。随访在死亡、保险退出、治疗中断(间隔小于或等于45天)最早发生时结束,在natalizumab停止或研究结束之前切换到另一种疾病改善治疗。方法:使用个人时间方法评估复发和HCRU,以解释不同的随访时间。使用经过验证的基于索赔的算法识别复发,并使用Kaplan-Meier方法分析首次复发的时间。使用单变量Cox模型估计复发的风险比。计算基线和随访、1L和2L+治疗组之间HCRU的平均差异(MD)。结果:1L组共纳入1174例,平均年龄39.0岁,女性72.0%;2L+组共纳入394例,平均年龄39.7岁,女性79.4%。1L组患者的基线ARR明显更高(1.48 vs 0.92, p p p = 0.002)。与2L+组相比,1L组住院次数(MD 10.01次/年)、LOS (MD 16.73天/年)和非natalizumab门诊次数(MD 11.64次/年)的减少幅度更大。结论:与后期使用相比,Natalizumab作为一线治疗与ARR和ms相关HCRU的更大降低相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating natalizumab first-line and later-line use in multiple sclerosis: a US claims database analysis.

Background: Limited information exists on the healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) associated with real-world natalizumab used as a first-line (1L) versus later-line (2L+) treatment in multiple sclerosis (MS).

Objectives: To describe natalizumab use in newly diagnosed MS patients treated as 1L or 2L+ and evaluate unadjusted annualized relapse rates (ARR) and MS-related HCRU before and after treatment initiation.

Design: This retrospective observational study utilized Komodo Health Sentinel claims data from October 2015 to August 2022. The study included adults diagnosed with incident MS who initiated natalizumab treatment, with insurance coverage for at least 12 months before diagnosis and 24 months after. The index date was the first natalizumab claim on or after the diagnosis. Baseline was defined as the 365 days prior to the index date, truncated at the time of diagnosis. Follow-up ended at the earliest occurrence of death, insurance disenrollment, treatment discontinuation (gap ⩾45 days), switch to another disease-modifying therapy before natalizumab discontinuation, or study end.

Methods: Relapses and HCRU were assessed using person-time methods to account for varying follow-up times. Relapses were identified using a validated claims-based algorithm, and time to first relapse was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Hazard ratios for relapse were estimated using univariate Cox models. Mean differences (MD) in HCRU between baseline and follow-up and between 1L and 2L+ treatment groups were calculated.

Results: A total of 1174 patients in the 1L group (mean age 39.0, 72.0% female) and 394 in the 2L+ group (mean age 39.7, 79.4% female) were included. Patients in the 1L group had a significantly higher baseline ARR (1.48 vs 0.92, p < 0.001) and lower on-treatment ARR (0.28 vs 0.41 for 2L+, p < 0.001). HCRU decreased significantly in the 1L group from baseline to follow-up: hospitalizations (MD 17.01 visits/year), length of stay (LOS; MD 20.96 days/year), emergency room visits (MD 9.83 visits/year), non-natalizumab outpatient visits (MD 12.11 visits/year) and long-term care facility stays (MD 22.18 days/year, p = 0.002). The 1L group showed greater reductions in inpatient visits (MD 10.01 visits//year), LOS (MD 16.73 days/year) and non-natalizumab outpatient visits (MD 11.64 visits/year) compared to the 2L+ group.

Conclusion: Natalizumab as a first-line treatment was associated with greater reductions in ARR and MS-related HCRU compared to later-line use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
1.70%
发文量
62
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders is a peer-reviewed, open access journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of neurology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in neurology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信