骶骨切除术后膀胱、肠和行走功能的长期变化。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005326
Joshua M Coan, Jordan O Gasho, Joseph J Connolly, Santiago A Lozano-Calderon, Kevin A Raskin, Joseph H Schwab, Daniel G Tobert
{"title":"骶骨切除术后膀胱、肠和行走功能的长期变化。","authors":"Joshua M Coan, Jordan O Gasho, Joseph J Connolly, Santiago A Lozano-Calderon, Kevin A Raskin, Joseph H Schwab, Daniel G Tobert","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess 5-year bladder, bowel, and ambulatory function in patients receiving sacral tumor resection surgery.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Sacral tumors are rare and slow growing, often leading to late diagnoses and large tumor size. Surgical resection is the standard of care, and frequently involves nerve root sacrifice. These structures are important for bladder, bowel, and ambulatory function, and previous studies have limited follow-up. Hence, little is known regarding how sacral nerve function changes over time after sacrectomy surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 43 patients who received surgery at our institution. Patients were stratified into groups based on osteotomy level (intralesional, low, mid, and high). Descriptive statistics were calculated with point estimates. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare oncologic, surgical, and functional outcomes across sacrectomy groups. Cumulative link mixed models (CLMMs) were used to assess functional trends over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant differences in preoperative and 1-year bladder, bowel, and ambulatory function (P<0.05). However, there were no significant differences between 1-year and 5-year bladder, bowel, and ambulatory function (P=0.99, P=0.80, and P=0.72). At 5-years, bladder function was significantly better in the intralesional and low sacrectomy versus the mid sacrectomy group (P=0.04 and P=0.002). At 5-years, bowel function was significantly better in the intralesional and low sacrectomy versus the mid sacrectomy group (P=0.01 and P=0.01). At 5-years, ambulatory function was significantly better in the low sacrectomy versus the high sacrectomy group (P=0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As expected, higher osteotomy level was associated with poorer function. Bladder, bowel, and ambulatory function was shown to stabilize at 1-year postoperatively. This can serve as an assessment point for long-term function and can help set patient expectations after surgery.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Bladder, Bowel, and Ambulatory Function After Sacrectomy Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Joshua M Coan, Jordan O Gasho, Joseph J Connolly, Santiago A Lozano-Calderon, Kevin A Raskin, Joseph H Schwab, Daniel G Tobert\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess 5-year bladder, bowel, and ambulatory function in patients receiving sacral tumor resection surgery.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Sacral tumors are rare and slow growing, often leading to late diagnoses and large tumor size. Surgical resection is the standard of care, and frequently involves nerve root sacrifice. These structures are important for bladder, bowel, and ambulatory function, and previous studies have limited follow-up. Hence, little is known regarding how sacral nerve function changes over time after sacrectomy surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 43 patients who received surgery at our institution. Patients were stratified into groups based on osteotomy level (intralesional, low, mid, and high). Descriptive statistics were calculated with point estimates. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare oncologic, surgical, and functional outcomes across sacrectomy groups. Cumulative link mixed models (CLMMs) were used to assess functional trends over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant differences in preoperative and 1-year bladder, bowel, and ambulatory function (P<0.05). However, there were no significant differences between 1-year and 5-year bladder, bowel, and ambulatory function (P=0.99, P=0.80, and P=0.72). At 5-years, bladder function was significantly better in the intralesional and low sacrectomy versus the mid sacrectomy group (P=0.04 and P=0.002). At 5-years, bowel function was significantly better in the intralesional and low sacrectomy versus the mid sacrectomy group (P=0.01 and P=0.01). At 5-years, ambulatory function was significantly better in the low sacrectomy versus the high sacrectomy group (P=0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As expected, higher osteotomy level was associated with poorer function. Bladder, bowel, and ambulatory function was shown to stabilize at 1-year postoperatively. This can serve as an assessment point for long-term function and can help set patient expectations after surgery.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, cohort study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005326\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005326","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:回顾性队列研究。目的:评价骶骨肿瘤切除术患者5年的膀胱、肠和行走功能。背景资料总结:骶骨肿瘤罕见,生长缓慢,常导致诊断晚,肿瘤体积大。手术切除是标准的治疗方法,经常需要牺牲神经根。这些结构对膀胱、肠和移动功能很重要,以往的研究随访有限。因此,关于骶骨切除术后骶骨神经功能如何随时间变化的了解甚少。方法:对我院43例手术患者进行回顾性分析。根据截骨水平(病灶内、低、中、高)对患者进行分层。描述性统计用点估计计算。Kruskal-Wallis试验用于比较骶骨切除术组的肿瘤、手术和功能结果。累积链接混合模型(clmm)用于评估功能随时间的变化趋势。结果:术前和1年膀胱、肠和移动功能有显著差异(p)结论:正如预期的那样,截骨水平越高,功能越差。术后1年膀胱、肠和行走功能稳定。这可以作为长期功能的评估点,并可以帮助患者在手术后设定期望。证据等级:III级,队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-Term Bladder, Bowel, and Ambulatory Function After Sacrectomy Surgery.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: To assess 5-year bladder, bowel, and ambulatory function in patients receiving sacral tumor resection surgery.

Summary of background data: Sacral tumors are rare and slow growing, often leading to late diagnoses and large tumor size. Surgical resection is the standard of care, and frequently involves nerve root sacrifice. These structures are important for bladder, bowel, and ambulatory function, and previous studies have limited follow-up. Hence, little is known regarding how sacral nerve function changes over time after sacrectomy surgery.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 43 patients who received surgery at our institution. Patients were stratified into groups based on osteotomy level (intralesional, low, mid, and high). Descriptive statistics were calculated with point estimates. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare oncologic, surgical, and functional outcomes across sacrectomy groups. Cumulative link mixed models (CLMMs) were used to assess functional trends over time.

Results: There were significant differences in preoperative and 1-year bladder, bowel, and ambulatory function (P<0.05). However, there were no significant differences between 1-year and 5-year bladder, bowel, and ambulatory function (P=0.99, P=0.80, and P=0.72). At 5-years, bladder function was significantly better in the intralesional and low sacrectomy versus the mid sacrectomy group (P=0.04 and P=0.002). At 5-years, bowel function was significantly better in the intralesional and low sacrectomy versus the mid sacrectomy group (P=0.01 and P=0.01). At 5-years, ambulatory function was significantly better in the low sacrectomy versus the high sacrectomy group (P=0.006).

Conclusion: As expected, higher osteotomy level was associated with poorer function. Bladder, bowel, and ambulatory function was shown to stabilize at 1-year postoperatively. This can serve as an assessment point for long-term function and can help set patient expectations after surgery.

Level of evidence: Level III, cohort study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信