在智能工作环境中评估员工绩效,关注心理距离和过程,而不是以结果为中心。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Bong-Goon Seo, Do-Hyung Park
{"title":"在智能工作环境中评估员工绩效,关注心理距离和过程,而不是以结果为中心。","authors":"Bong-Goon Seo, Do-Hyung Park","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-94254-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rapid development of IT technology and social changes has given rise to a new work modality known as smart work. This study explores how the psychological distance between evaluators and those evaluated in a smart work environment influences assessments, centering around construal level theory. The findings reveal that smart work increases the psychological distance for evaluators, thereby elevating their level of construal and leading to outcome-focused thinking. In contrast, traditional work methods keep psychological distance relatively closer, fostering process-oriented thinking. This research highlights the crucial role of psychological distance in shaping evaluation strategies in workplaces and offers valuable insights for organizations aiming to effectively integrate smart work practices. This exploration not only contributes to our understanding of smart work's organizational and psychological dynamics but also suggests implications for performance management systems in contemporary work environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"9089"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11914460/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating employee performance in smart work environment with focus on psychological distance and process versus outcome-centric approaches.\",\"authors\":\"Bong-Goon Seo, Do-Hyung Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-94254-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The rapid development of IT technology and social changes has given rise to a new work modality known as smart work. This study explores how the psychological distance between evaluators and those evaluated in a smart work environment influences assessments, centering around construal level theory. The findings reveal that smart work increases the psychological distance for evaluators, thereby elevating their level of construal and leading to outcome-focused thinking. In contrast, traditional work methods keep psychological distance relatively closer, fostering process-oriented thinking. This research highlights the crucial role of psychological distance in shaping evaluation strategies in workplaces and offers valuable insights for organizations aiming to effectively integrate smart work practices. This exploration not only contributes to our understanding of smart work's organizational and psychological dynamics but also suggests implications for performance management systems in contemporary work environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"9089\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11914460/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94254-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94254-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

IT技术的快速发展和社会的变革催生了一种新的工作方式——智能工作。本研究以解释水平理论为中心,探讨了智能工作环境中评估者与被评估者之间的心理距离如何影响评估。研究结果表明,聪明的工作增加了评估者的心理距离,从而提高了他们的解释水平,并导致了以结果为中心的思维。相比之下,传统的工作方法使心理距离相对较近,培养了过程导向的思维。这项研究强调了心理距离在塑造工作场所评估策略中的关键作用,并为旨在有效整合智能工作实践的组织提供了有价值的见解。这一探索不仅有助于我们对智能工作的组织和心理动力学的理解,而且还对当代工作环境中的绩效管理系统提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluating employee performance in smart work environment with focus on psychological distance and process versus outcome-centric approaches.

Evaluating employee performance in smart work environment with focus on psychological distance and process versus outcome-centric approaches.

Evaluating employee performance in smart work environment with focus on psychological distance and process versus outcome-centric approaches.

Evaluating employee performance in smart work environment with focus on psychological distance and process versus outcome-centric approaches.

The rapid development of IT technology and social changes has given rise to a new work modality known as smart work. This study explores how the psychological distance between evaluators and those evaluated in a smart work environment influences assessments, centering around construal level theory. The findings reveal that smart work increases the psychological distance for evaluators, thereby elevating their level of construal and leading to outcome-focused thinking. In contrast, traditional work methods keep psychological distance relatively closer, fostering process-oriented thinking. This research highlights the crucial role of psychological distance in shaping evaluation strategies in workplaces and offers valuable insights for organizations aiming to effectively integrate smart work practices. This exploration not only contributes to our understanding of smart work's organizational and psychological dynamics but also suggests implications for performance management systems in contemporary work environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信