通过机器学习估计非药物干预措施对七个欧盟国家COVID-19传播的因果影响。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Jannis Guski, Jonas Botz, Holger Fröhlich
{"title":"通过机器学习估计非药物干预措施对七个欧盟国家COVID-19传播的因果影响。","authors":"Jannis Guski, Jonas Botz, Holger Fröhlich","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-88433-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the COVID-19 pandemic, Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) were imposed all over Europe with the intent to reduce infection spread. However, reports on the effectiveness of those measures across different European countries are inconclusive up to now. Moreover, attempts to predict the effect of NPIs in a prospective and dynamical manner with the aim to support decision makers in future global health emergencies are largely lacking. Here, we explore causal machine learning to isolate causal effects of NPIs in observational public health data from seven EU countries, taking into account specific challenges like their sequential nature, effect heterogeneity, time-dependent confounding and lack of robustness due to violated assumptions. In a pseudo-prospective scenario planning analysis, we investigate which recommendations our model would have made during the second wave of the pandemic in Germany, demonstrating its capacity to generalize to the near future and identifying effective NPIs. In retrospect, our approach indicates that a wide range of response measures curbed COVID-19 across countries, especially in the early phases of the pandemic. Interestingly, this includes controversial interventions like strict school and border closures, but also recommendation-based policies in Sweden. Finally, we discuss important data- and modeling-related considerations that may optimize causal effect estimation in future pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"9203"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11914055/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating the causal impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 spread in seven EU countries via machine learning.\",\"authors\":\"Jannis Guski, Jonas Botz, Holger Fröhlich\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-88433-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>During the COVID-19 pandemic, Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) were imposed all over Europe with the intent to reduce infection spread. However, reports on the effectiveness of those measures across different European countries are inconclusive up to now. Moreover, attempts to predict the effect of NPIs in a prospective and dynamical manner with the aim to support decision makers in future global health emergencies are largely lacking. Here, we explore causal machine learning to isolate causal effects of NPIs in observational public health data from seven EU countries, taking into account specific challenges like their sequential nature, effect heterogeneity, time-dependent confounding and lack of robustness due to violated assumptions. In a pseudo-prospective scenario planning analysis, we investigate which recommendations our model would have made during the second wave of the pandemic in Germany, demonstrating its capacity to generalize to the near future and identifying effective NPIs. In retrospect, our approach indicates that a wide range of response measures curbed COVID-19 across countries, especially in the early phases of the pandemic. Interestingly, this includes controversial interventions like strict school and border closures, but also recommendation-based policies in Sweden. Finally, we discuss important data- and modeling-related considerations that may optimize causal effect estimation in future pandemics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"9203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11914055/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88433-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88433-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,欧洲各地实施了非药物干预措施(npi),旨在减少感染传播。然而,到目前为止,关于这些措施在不同欧洲国家的有效性的报告尚无定论。此外,在很大程度上缺乏以前瞻性和动态的方式预测国家行动计划的影响,以便在未来的全球卫生突发事件中支持决策者。在这里,我们探索了因果机器学习,以从七个欧盟国家的观察性公共卫生数据中分离出npi的因果效应,同时考虑到具体的挑战,如它们的序列性、效应异质性、时间依赖性混淆以及由于违反假设而缺乏鲁棒性。在伪前瞻性情景规划分析中,我们调查了我们的模型在德国第二波大流行期间会提出哪些建议,证明了其推广到近期的能力,并确定了有效的npi。回顾过去,我们的方法表明,各国采取了广泛的应对措施,特别是在大流行的早期阶段,遏制了COVID-19。有趣的是,这包括有争议的干预措施,如严格的学校和边境关闭,但也包括瑞典的推荐政策。最后,我们讨论了可能优化未来流行病因果效应估计的重要数据和建模相关考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimating the causal impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 spread in seven EU countries via machine learning.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) were imposed all over Europe with the intent to reduce infection spread. However, reports on the effectiveness of those measures across different European countries are inconclusive up to now. Moreover, attempts to predict the effect of NPIs in a prospective and dynamical manner with the aim to support decision makers in future global health emergencies are largely lacking. Here, we explore causal machine learning to isolate causal effects of NPIs in observational public health data from seven EU countries, taking into account specific challenges like their sequential nature, effect heterogeneity, time-dependent confounding and lack of robustness due to violated assumptions. In a pseudo-prospective scenario planning analysis, we investigate which recommendations our model would have made during the second wave of the pandemic in Germany, demonstrating its capacity to generalize to the near future and identifying effective NPIs. In retrospect, our approach indicates that a wide range of response measures curbed COVID-19 across countries, especially in the early phases of the pandemic. Interestingly, this includes controversial interventions like strict school and border closures, but also recommendation-based policies in Sweden. Finally, we discuss important data- and modeling-related considerations that may optimize causal effect estimation in future pandemics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信