Carlo De Matteis, Fabio Novielli, Ersilia Di Buduo, Maria Arconzo, Raffaella Maria Gadaleta, Marica Cariello, Antonio Moschetta, Lucilla Crudele
{"title":"血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数可识别严重肝脏脂肪变性的受试者。","authors":"Carlo De Matteis, Fabio Novielli, Ersilia Di Buduo, Maria Arconzo, Raffaella Maria Gadaleta, Marica Cariello, Antonio Moschetta, Lucilla Crudele","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-93141-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Atherogenic Index of Plasma (AIP), calculated by log (Triglycerides/HDL-C), has been proposed as a marker of atherogenic and cardiovascular risk. Atherosclerosis and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) share some pathogenic features and may be considered clinical manifestations of Metabolic Syndrome. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of increased AIP as a putative metabolic biomarker for MASLD. 1,496 individuals (49% males and 51% females) underwent clinical examination for Metabolic Syndrome at Internal Medicine Division \"C. Frugoni\" of University Hospital of Bari, Italy in the period between January 2016 and April 2024. Clinical history was recorded, and physical examination, anthropometric measures, biochemical assessment, and abdomen ultrasound were performed. In the overall population, AIP significantly correlated with fasting glycemia (FPG, r = 0.26, p < 0.0001), HbA1c (r = 0.20, p < 0.0001), LDL (r = 0.11, p < 0.0001) and total cholesterol (r = 0.09; p < 0.0001), and anthropometric measures of obesity BMI (r = 0.37, p < 0.0001) and Waist Circumference (r = 0.44; p < 0.001). We then investigated AIP values in patients with and without dysmetabolic conditions, finding that AIP significantly increased as steatosis worsened (p < 0.001). ROC curves identified an optimal cut-off of 0.31 for accurately diagnosing severe steatosis and AIP values above this cut-off discriminated patients with significantly increased (p < 0.0001) fasting glycemia, LDL, and waist circumference, and were strongly associated (p < 0.0001) with MASLD (LLR 85.3), type 2 diabetes (LLR 85.5), abdominal obesity (LLR 72.9), overweight (LLR 151.8), and systemic obesity (LLR 178.4). The risk for being diagnosed with such conditions was found to be even higher in the subpopulation of patients with severe liver steatosis. To validate our findings, we considered another cohort of patients with and without biopsy-proven liver steatosis (public dataset GSE89632), confirming that a significant increase (p < 0.001) in AIP values could be found in patients with liver steatosis compared to healthy controls. AIP can be considered a specific biomarker of fatty liver disease with high sensitivity for the diagnosis of the severe form of liver steatosis. Considering AIP in the evaluation of patients with liver steatosis may augment the accuracy for diagnosing metabolic impairment and MASLD.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"9136"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11914574/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Atherogenic index of plasma identifies subjects with severe liver steatosis.\",\"authors\":\"Carlo De Matteis, Fabio Novielli, Ersilia Di Buduo, Maria Arconzo, Raffaella Maria Gadaleta, Marica Cariello, Antonio Moschetta, Lucilla Crudele\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-93141-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Atherogenic Index of Plasma (AIP), calculated by log (Triglycerides/HDL-C), has been proposed as a marker of atherogenic and cardiovascular risk. Atherosclerosis and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) share some pathogenic features and may be considered clinical manifestations of Metabolic Syndrome. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of increased AIP as a putative metabolic biomarker for MASLD. 1,496 individuals (49% males and 51% females) underwent clinical examination for Metabolic Syndrome at Internal Medicine Division \\\"C. Frugoni\\\" of University Hospital of Bari, Italy in the period between January 2016 and April 2024. Clinical history was recorded, and physical examination, anthropometric measures, biochemical assessment, and abdomen ultrasound were performed. In the overall population, AIP significantly correlated with fasting glycemia (FPG, r = 0.26, p < 0.0001), HbA1c (r = 0.20, p < 0.0001), LDL (r = 0.11, p < 0.0001) and total cholesterol (r = 0.09; p < 0.0001), and anthropometric measures of obesity BMI (r = 0.37, p < 0.0001) and Waist Circumference (r = 0.44; p < 0.001). We then investigated AIP values in patients with and without dysmetabolic conditions, finding that AIP significantly increased as steatosis worsened (p < 0.001). ROC curves identified an optimal cut-off of 0.31 for accurately diagnosing severe steatosis and AIP values above this cut-off discriminated patients with significantly increased (p < 0.0001) fasting glycemia, LDL, and waist circumference, and were strongly associated (p < 0.0001) with MASLD (LLR 85.3), type 2 diabetes (LLR 85.5), abdominal obesity (LLR 72.9), overweight (LLR 151.8), and systemic obesity (LLR 178.4). The risk for being diagnosed with such conditions was found to be even higher in the subpopulation of patients with severe liver steatosis. To validate our findings, we considered another cohort of patients with and without biopsy-proven liver steatosis (public dataset GSE89632), confirming that a significant increase (p < 0.001) in AIP values could be found in patients with liver steatosis compared to healthy controls. AIP can be considered a specific biomarker of fatty liver disease with high sensitivity for the diagnosis of the severe form of liver steatosis. Considering AIP in the evaluation of patients with liver steatosis may augment the accuracy for diagnosing metabolic impairment and MASLD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"9136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11914574/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-93141-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-93141-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
血浆动脉粥样硬化指数(AIP),由log(甘油三酯/HDL-C)计算,已被提出作为动脉粥样硬化和心血管风险的标志。动脉粥样硬化和代谢功能障碍相关脂肪变性肝病(MASLD)有一些共同的致病特征,可能被认为是代谢综合征的临床表现。在这项研究中,我们旨在研究AIP升高作为MASLD的推定代谢生物标志物的作用。2016年1月至2024年4月期间,1,496人(49%男性,51%女性)在意大利巴里大学医院内科“C. Frugoni”接受了代谢综合征的临床检查。记录临床病史,进行体格检查、人体测量、生化评估、腹部超声检查。在总体人群中,AIP与空腹血糖显著相关(FPG, r = 0.26, p
Atherogenic index of plasma identifies subjects with severe liver steatosis.
The Atherogenic Index of Plasma (AIP), calculated by log (Triglycerides/HDL-C), has been proposed as a marker of atherogenic and cardiovascular risk. Atherosclerosis and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) share some pathogenic features and may be considered clinical manifestations of Metabolic Syndrome. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of increased AIP as a putative metabolic biomarker for MASLD. 1,496 individuals (49% males and 51% females) underwent clinical examination for Metabolic Syndrome at Internal Medicine Division "C. Frugoni" of University Hospital of Bari, Italy in the period between January 2016 and April 2024. Clinical history was recorded, and physical examination, anthropometric measures, biochemical assessment, and abdomen ultrasound were performed. In the overall population, AIP significantly correlated with fasting glycemia (FPG, r = 0.26, p < 0.0001), HbA1c (r = 0.20, p < 0.0001), LDL (r = 0.11, p < 0.0001) and total cholesterol (r = 0.09; p < 0.0001), and anthropometric measures of obesity BMI (r = 0.37, p < 0.0001) and Waist Circumference (r = 0.44; p < 0.001). We then investigated AIP values in patients with and without dysmetabolic conditions, finding that AIP significantly increased as steatosis worsened (p < 0.001). ROC curves identified an optimal cut-off of 0.31 for accurately diagnosing severe steatosis and AIP values above this cut-off discriminated patients with significantly increased (p < 0.0001) fasting glycemia, LDL, and waist circumference, and were strongly associated (p < 0.0001) with MASLD (LLR 85.3), type 2 diabetes (LLR 85.5), abdominal obesity (LLR 72.9), overweight (LLR 151.8), and systemic obesity (LLR 178.4). The risk for being diagnosed with such conditions was found to be even higher in the subpopulation of patients with severe liver steatosis. To validate our findings, we considered another cohort of patients with and without biopsy-proven liver steatosis (public dataset GSE89632), confirming that a significant increase (p < 0.001) in AIP values could be found in patients with liver steatosis compared to healthy controls. AIP can be considered a specific biomarker of fatty liver disease with high sensitivity for the diagnosis of the severe form of liver steatosis. Considering AIP in the evaluation of patients with liver steatosis may augment the accuracy for diagnosing metabolic impairment and MASLD.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.