为风湿病多学科团队设计,交付和评估一个专门的质量改进课程。

IF 2.1 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Rheumatology Advances in Practice Pub Date : 2024-09-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/rap/rkae110
Rosalind M Benson, Charlotte A Sharp, Elizabeth M MacPhie, Hannah S Baird
{"title":"为风湿病多学科团队设计,交付和评估一个专门的质量改进课程。","authors":"Rosalind M Benson, Charlotte A Sharp, Elizabeth M MacPhie, Hannah S Baird","doi":"10.1093/rap/rkae110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Quality improvement (QI) methodology aims to drive improvement in healthcare using a systematic approach. QI is an integral part of healthcare professional training curricula. However, many members of the rheumatology community have not accessed formal QI methodology training, including those expected to supervise QI activity. The BSR QI practical methodology workshop was created to address this knowledge gap in a specialty-specific course designed and delivered by, and for, the rheumatology multidisciplinary team.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Course design centred on the Institute for Healthcare Improvement approach, 'Model for improvement', adapting materials from the well-established Trainees Improving Patient Safety through QI (TIPSQI) initiative. The course was delivered online (2021) and face-to-face (2022). Kolbs' four-stage experiential learning cycle informed course design utilizing rheumatology-specific cases and facilitated breakout rooms to teach QI tools. Kirkpatrick's four-stage model was used to design the course evaluation. Data from surveys completed before, immediately after, and 6 months following the courses, were used to evaluate the course.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline knowledge of specific QI tools was limited. Post course evaluation demonstrated increased confidence to use and teach tools. Sustained confidence to contribute to and lead QI activity was reported. Course satisfaction was high; 100% of delegates would recommend the course to colleagues.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This successful, rheumatology-specific QI course led to improved delegate knowledge of QI methodology and confidence in leading and teaching QI initiatives. It has contributed to building momentum in a growing rheumatology QI community of practice and to embedding a sustainable culture of improvement across the rheumatology community.</p>","PeriodicalId":21350,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","volume":"9 2","pages":"rkae110"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11908373/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing, delivering and evaluating a specialty-specific quality improvement course for the rheumatology multidisciplinary team.\",\"authors\":\"Rosalind M Benson, Charlotte A Sharp, Elizabeth M MacPhie, Hannah S Baird\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/rap/rkae110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Quality improvement (QI) methodology aims to drive improvement in healthcare using a systematic approach. QI is an integral part of healthcare professional training curricula. However, many members of the rheumatology community have not accessed formal QI methodology training, including those expected to supervise QI activity. The BSR QI practical methodology workshop was created to address this knowledge gap in a specialty-specific course designed and delivered by, and for, the rheumatology multidisciplinary team.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Course design centred on the Institute for Healthcare Improvement approach, 'Model for improvement', adapting materials from the well-established Trainees Improving Patient Safety through QI (TIPSQI) initiative. The course was delivered online (2021) and face-to-face (2022). Kolbs' four-stage experiential learning cycle informed course design utilizing rheumatology-specific cases and facilitated breakout rooms to teach QI tools. Kirkpatrick's four-stage model was used to design the course evaluation. Data from surveys completed before, immediately after, and 6 months following the courses, were used to evaluate the course.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline knowledge of specific QI tools was limited. Post course evaluation demonstrated increased confidence to use and teach tools. Sustained confidence to contribute to and lead QI activity was reported. Course satisfaction was high; 100% of delegates would recommend the course to colleagues.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This successful, rheumatology-specific QI course led to improved delegate knowledge of QI methodology and confidence in leading and teaching QI initiatives. It has contributed to building momentum in a growing rheumatology QI community of practice and to embedding a sustainable culture of improvement across the rheumatology community.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology Advances in Practice\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"rkae110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11908373/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology Advances in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkae110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkae110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:质量改进(QI)方法旨在使用系统方法推动医疗保健的改进。QI是医疗保健专业培训课程的一个组成部分。然而,风湿病学界的许多成员没有接受过正式的QI方法学培训,包括那些期望监督QI活动的人。BSR QI实践方法研讨会的创建是为了解决风湿病多学科团队设计和提供的专业课程中的这一知识差距。方法:课程设计以医疗保健改进研究所的方法为中心,“改进模型”,改编来自完善的学员通过QI (TIPSQI)倡议改善患者安全的材料。该课程分为在线授课(2021年)和面对面授课(2022年)。Kolbs的四阶段体验式学习周期为利用风湿病特定病例的课程设计提供了信息,并促进了分组讨论室教授QI工具。采用Kirkpatrick四阶段模型设计课程评价。课程前、课程后和课程后6个月完成的调查数据用于评估课程。结果:对特定QI工具的基线知识有限。课程结束后的评估显示了使用和教授工具的信心增加。报告持续有信心参与和领导空气质量指数活动。课程满意度高;100%的代表会向同事推荐该课程。结论:这个成功的、风湿病特有的气学课程提高了代表们对气学方法学的认识,提高了领导和教授气学活动的信心。它有助于在不断增长的风湿病QI实践社区中建立动力,并在整个风湿病社区中嵌入可持续的改进文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing, delivering and evaluating a specialty-specific quality improvement course for the rheumatology multidisciplinary team.

Objectives: Quality improvement (QI) methodology aims to drive improvement in healthcare using a systematic approach. QI is an integral part of healthcare professional training curricula. However, many members of the rheumatology community have not accessed formal QI methodology training, including those expected to supervise QI activity. The BSR QI practical methodology workshop was created to address this knowledge gap in a specialty-specific course designed and delivered by, and for, the rheumatology multidisciplinary team.

Methods: Course design centred on the Institute for Healthcare Improvement approach, 'Model for improvement', adapting materials from the well-established Trainees Improving Patient Safety through QI (TIPSQI) initiative. The course was delivered online (2021) and face-to-face (2022). Kolbs' four-stage experiential learning cycle informed course design utilizing rheumatology-specific cases and facilitated breakout rooms to teach QI tools. Kirkpatrick's four-stage model was used to design the course evaluation. Data from surveys completed before, immediately after, and 6 months following the courses, were used to evaluate the course.

Results: Baseline knowledge of specific QI tools was limited. Post course evaluation demonstrated increased confidence to use and teach tools. Sustained confidence to contribute to and lead QI activity was reported. Course satisfaction was high; 100% of delegates would recommend the course to colleagues.

Conclusion: This successful, rheumatology-specific QI course led to improved delegate knowledge of QI methodology and confidence in leading and teaching QI initiatives. It has contributed to building momentum in a growing rheumatology QI community of practice and to embedding a sustainable culture of improvement across the rheumatology community.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rheumatology Advances in Practice
Rheumatology Advances in Practice Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
197
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信