Brahm D Sanger, Arij Alarachi, Heather E McNeely, Margaret C McKinnon, Randi E McCabe
{"title":"脑雾和创伤后应激障碍的认知功能障碍:基于证据的回顾。","authors":"Brahm D Sanger, Arij Alarachi, Heather E McNeely, Margaret C McKinnon, Randi E McCabe","doi":"10.2147/PRBM.S461173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The term \"brain fog\" has long been used both colloquially and in research literature in reference to various neurocognitive phenomenon that detract from cognitive efficiency. We define \"brain fog\" as the subjective experience of cognitive difficulties, in keeping with the most common colloquial and research use of the term. While a recent increase in use of this term has largely been in the context of the post-coronavirus-19 condition known as long COVID, \"brain fog\" has also been discussed in relation to several other conditions including mental health conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). PTSD is associated with both subjective cognitive complaints and relative deficits on cognitive testing, but the phenomenology and mechanisms contributing to \"brain fog\" in this population are poorly understood. PTSD psychopathology across cognitive, affective and physiological symptom domains have been tied to \"brain fog\". Furthermore, dissociative symptoms common in PTSD also contribute to the experience of \"brain fog\". Comorbid physical and mental health conditions may also increase the risk of experiencing \"brain fog\" among individuals with PTSD. Considerations for the assessment of \"brain fog\" in PTSD as part of psychodiagnostic assessment are discussed. While standard psychological intervention for PTSD is associated with a reduction in subjective cognitive deficits, other cognitive interventions may be valuable when \"brain fog\" persists following PTSD remission or when \"brain fog\" interferes with treatment. Limitations of current research on \"brain fog\" in PTSD include a lack of consistent definition and operationalization of \"brain fog\" in the literature, as well as limited tools for measurement. Future research should address these limitations, as well as further evaluate the use of cognitive remediation as an intervention for \"brain fog\".</p>","PeriodicalId":20954,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","volume":"18 ","pages":"589-606"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11910923/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brain Fog and Cognitive Dysfunction in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: An Evidence-Based Review.\",\"authors\":\"Brahm D Sanger, Arij Alarachi, Heather E McNeely, Margaret C McKinnon, Randi E McCabe\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PRBM.S461173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The term \\\"brain fog\\\" has long been used both colloquially and in research literature in reference to various neurocognitive phenomenon that detract from cognitive efficiency. We define \\\"brain fog\\\" as the subjective experience of cognitive difficulties, in keeping with the most common colloquial and research use of the term. While a recent increase in use of this term has largely been in the context of the post-coronavirus-19 condition known as long COVID, \\\"brain fog\\\" has also been discussed in relation to several other conditions including mental health conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). PTSD is associated with both subjective cognitive complaints and relative deficits on cognitive testing, but the phenomenology and mechanisms contributing to \\\"brain fog\\\" in this population are poorly understood. PTSD psychopathology across cognitive, affective and physiological symptom domains have been tied to \\\"brain fog\\\". Furthermore, dissociative symptoms common in PTSD also contribute to the experience of \\\"brain fog\\\". Comorbid physical and mental health conditions may also increase the risk of experiencing \\\"brain fog\\\" among individuals with PTSD. Considerations for the assessment of \\\"brain fog\\\" in PTSD as part of psychodiagnostic assessment are discussed. While standard psychological intervention for PTSD is associated with a reduction in subjective cognitive deficits, other cognitive interventions may be valuable when \\\"brain fog\\\" persists following PTSD remission or when \\\"brain fog\\\" interferes with treatment. Limitations of current research on \\\"brain fog\\\" in PTSD include a lack of consistent definition and operationalization of \\\"brain fog\\\" in the literature, as well as limited tools for measurement. Future research should address these limitations, as well as further evaluate the use of cognitive remediation as an intervention for \\\"brain fog\\\".</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology Research and Behavior Management\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"589-606\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11910923/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology Research and Behavior Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S461173\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S461173","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Brain Fog and Cognitive Dysfunction in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: An Evidence-Based Review.
The term "brain fog" has long been used both colloquially and in research literature in reference to various neurocognitive phenomenon that detract from cognitive efficiency. We define "brain fog" as the subjective experience of cognitive difficulties, in keeping with the most common colloquial and research use of the term. While a recent increase in use of this term has largely been in the context of the post-coronavirus-19 condition known as long COVID, "brain fog" has also been discussed in relation to several other conditions including mental health conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). PTSD is associated with both subjective cognitive complaints and relative deficits on cognitive testing, but the phenomenology and mechanisms contributing to "brain fog" in this population are poorly understood. PTSD psychopathology across cognitive, affective and physiological symptom domains have been tied to "brain fog". Furthermore, dissociative symptoms common in PTSD also contribute to the experience of "brain fog". Comorbid physical and mental health conditions may also increase the risk of experiencing "brain fog" among individuals with PTSD. Considerations for the assessment of "brain fog" in PTSD as part of psychodiagnostic assessment are discussed. While standard psychological intervention for PTSD is associated with a reduction in subjective cognitive deficits, other cognitive interventions may be valuable when "brain fog" persists following PTSD remission or when "brain fog" interferes with treatment. Limitations of current research on "brain fog" in PTSD include a lack of consistent definition and operationalization of "brain fog" in the literature, as well as limited tools for measurement. Future research should address these limitations, as well as further evaluate the use of cognitive remediation as an intervention for "brain fog".
期刊介绍:
Psychology Research and Behavior Management is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on the science of psychology and its application in behavior management to develop improved outcomes in the clinical, educational, sports and business arenas. Specific topics covered in the journal include: -Neuroscience, memory and decision making -Behavior modification and management -Clinical applications -Business and sports performance management -Social and developmental studies -Animal studies The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical studies, surveys, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.