探索“适合工作”原则:职业体力活动、心肺健康和死亡率之间的关系——对男性工人数据的荟萃分析。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Margo Ketels, Bart Cillekens, Els Clays, Maaike A Huysmans, Dirk De Bacquer, Andreas Holtermann, Richard P Troiano, Paul Jarle Mork, Steinar Krokstad, Henry Völzke, Marcus Dörr, Martin Bahls, Till Ittermann, Johan Clausen, Magnus T Jensen, Jussi Kauhanen, Ari Voutilainen, Miriam Wanner, Matthias Bopp, Willem van Mechelen, Allard J van der Beek, Pieter Coenen
{"title":"探索“适合工作”原则:职业体力活动、心肺健康和死亡率之间的关系——对男性工人数据的荟萃分析。","authors":"Margo Ketels, Bart Cillekens, Els Clays, Maaike A Huysmans, Dirk De Bacquer, Andreas Holtermann, Richard P Troiano, Paul Jarle Mork, Steinar Krokstad, Henry Völzke, Marcus Dörr, Martin Bahls, Till Ittermann, Johan Clausen, Magnus T Jensen, Jussi Kauhanen, Ari Voutilainen, Miriam Wanner, Matthias Bopp, Willem van Mechelen, Allard J van der Beek, Pieter Coenen","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This individual participant data meta-analysis investigates the association between occupational physical activity (OPA) and both cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality across different cardio-respiratory fitness (CRF) groups among male workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were pooled from five European cohort studies. OPA was categorized into three levels and CRF into low, moderate, and high tertiles. OPA was assessed using self-reports and CRF through objective measurements. Two-stage meta-analyses were conducted. First, we analyzed each cohort using Cox-regression models then we pooled results with random effects model to evaluate the associations between OPA and both cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, stratified by CRF. Models were adjusted for age, body mass index, smoking status, leisure-time physical activity, and educational level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 9922 men (mean age 46.8, standard deviation 6.7, years), 55.7% died during an average 25.6-year follow-up, of which 29.3% died from cardiovascular causes. Individuals with low CRF and high levels of OPA showed increased risks of cardiovascular [hazard ratio (HR) 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.55] and all-cause mortality (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.40) compared to those with low CRF and low levels of OPA. High CRF mitigated cardiovascular mortality risk (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.79-1.48) but not all-cause mortality (HR 1.27, 95% CI 0.98-1.83) for those with high OPA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings for cardiovascular mortality suggest that high CRF levels may protect workers with physically demanding jobs from adverse cardiovascular outcomes, supporting the 'fit for work' principle. However, this protective effect was not observed for all-cause mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the 'fit for work' principle: The association between occupational physical activity, cardio-respiratory fitness, and mortality - a meta-analysis of male worker data.\",\"authors\":\"Margo Ketels, Bart Cillekens, Els Clays, Maaike A Huysmans, Dirk De Bacquer, Andreas Holtermann, Richard P Troiano, Paul Jarle Mork, Steinar Krokstad, Henry Völzke, Marcus Dörr, Martin Bahls, Till Ittermann, Johan Clausen, Magnus T Jensen, Jussi Kauhanen, Ari Voutilainen, Miriam Wanner, Matthias Bopp, Willem van Mechelen, Allard J van der Beek, Pieter Coenen\",\"doi\":\"10.5271/sjweh.4218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This individual participant data meta-analysis investigates the association between occupational physical activity (OPA) and both cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality across different cardio-respiratory fitness (CRF) groups among male workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were pooled from five European cohort studies. OPA was categorized into three levels and CRF into low, moderate, and high tertiles. OPA was assessed using self-reports and CRF through objective measurements. Two-stage meta-analyses were conducted. First, we analyzed each cohort using Cox-regression models then we pooled results with random effects model to evaluate the associations between OPA and both cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, stratified by CRF. Models were adjusted for age, body mass index, smoking status, leisure-time physical activity, and educational level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 9922 men (mean age 46.8, standard deviation 6.7, years), 55.7% died during an average 25.6-year follow-up, of which 29.3% died from cardiovascular causes. Individuals with low CRF and high levels of OPA showed increased risks of cardiovascular [hazard ratio (HR) 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.55] and all-cause mortality (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.40) compared to those with low CRF and low levels of OPA. High CRF mitigated cardiovascular mortality risk (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.79-1.48) but not all-cause mortality (HR 1.27, 95% CI 0.98-1.83) for those with high OPA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings for cardiovascular mortality suggest that high CRF levels may protect workers with physically demanding jobs from adverse cardiovascular outcomes, supporting the 'fit for work' principle. However, this protective effect was not observed for all-cause mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4218\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4218","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本个体参与者数据荟萃分析调查了不同心肺健康(CRF)男性工人中职业体力活动(OPA)与心血管死亡率和全因死亡率之间的关系。方法:数据来自5项欧洲队列研究。OPA分为3个等级,CRF分为低、中、高3个等级。通过自我报告和客观测量的CRF评估OPA。进行了两阶段荟萃分析。首先,我们使用cox回归模型对每个队列进行分析,然后将结果与随机效应模型合并,以CRF分层,评估OPA与心血管和全因死亡率之间的关系。模型根据年龄、体重指数、吸烟状况、闲暇时间体育活动和教育水平进行了调整。结果:9922名男性(平均年龄46.8岁,标准差6.7岁)在平均25.6年的随访期间死亡55.7%,其中29.3%死于心血管原因。与低CRF和低OPA水平的个体相比,低CRF和高OPA水平的个体心血管风险增加[风险比(HR) 1.27, 95%置信区间(CI) 1.04-1.55]和全因死亡率(HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.40)。高CRF降低了高OPA患者的心血管死亡风险(HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.79-1.48),但并非全因死亡率(HR 1.27, 95% CI 0.98-1.83)。结论:我们对心血管死亡率的研究结果表明,高CRF水平可以保护体力要求高的工人免受心血管疾病的不良后果,支持“适合工作”的原则。然而,在全因死亡率中没有观察到这种保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the 'fit for work' principle: The association between occupational physical activity, cardio-respiratory fitness, and mortality - a meta-analysis of male worker data.

Objectives: This individual participant data meta-analysis investigates the association between occupational physical activity (OPA) and both cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality across different cardio-respiratory fitness (CRF) groups among male workers.

Methods: Data were pooled from five European cohort studies. OPA was categorized into three levels and CRF into low, moderate, and high tertiles. OPA was assessed using self-reports and CRF through objective measurements. Two-stage meta-analyses were conducted. First, we analyzed each cohort using Cox-regression models then we pooled results with random effects model to evaluate the associations between OPA and both cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, stratified by CRF. Models were adjusted for age, body mass index, smoking status, leisure-time physical activity, and educational level.

Results: Among 9922 men (mean age 46.8, standard deviation 6.7, years), 55.7% died during an average 25.6-year follow-up, of which 29.3% died from cardiovascular causes. Individuals with low CRF and high levels of OPA showed increased risks of cardiovascular [hazard ratio (HR) 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.55] and all-cause mortality (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.40) compared to those with low CRF and low levels of OPA. High CRF mitigated cardiovascular mortality risk (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.79-1.48) but not all-cause mortality (HR 1.27, 95% CI 0.98-1.83) for those with high OPA.

Conclusions: Our findings for cardiovascular mortality suggest that high CRF levels may protect workers with physically demanding jobs from adverse cardiovascular outcomes, supporting the 'fit for work' principle. However, this protective effect was not observed for all-cause mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health
Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
9.50%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal is to promote research in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety and to increase knowledge through the publication of original research articles, systematic reviews, and other information of high interest. Areas of interest include occupational and environmental epidemiology, occupational and environmental medicine, psychosocial factors at work, physical work load, physical activity work-related mental and musculoskeletal problems, aging, work ability and return to work, working hours and health, occupational hygiene and toxicology, work safety and injury epidemiology as well as occupational health services. In addition to observational studies, quasi-experimental and intervention studies are welcome as well as methodological papers, occupational cohort profiles, and studies associated with economic evaluation. The Journal also publishes short communications, case reports, commentaries, discussion papers, clinical questions, consensus reports, meeting reports, other reports, book reviews, news, and announcements (jobs, courses, events etc).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信