自体骨移植与自体晚期富血小板纤维蛋白+对兔桡骨缺损再生的影响。

IF 0.9 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Open Veterinary Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.5455/OVJ.2024.v15.i1.31
Taher N Elmeshreghi, Fathy D El-Seddawy, Mohamed Gomaa, Mustafa Abd El Raouf, Shimaa A Ezzeldein
{"title":"自体骨移植与自体晚期富血小板纤维蛋白+对兔桡骨缺损再生的影响。","authors":"Taher N Elmeshreghi, Fathy D El-Seddawy, Mohamed Gomaa, Mustafa Abd El Raouf, Shimaa A Ezzeldein","doi":"10.5455/OVJ.2024.v15.i1.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bone grafts are an established treatment performed for managing segmental bone defects resulting from tumors, infections, high-energy trauma, congenital deformities, and nonunion.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the regenerative potential following the sole implantation of rib, coccygeal, and advanced platelet-rich fibrin plus (A-PRF+) autografts to repair radial bone defects in rabbits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Radial mid-shaft defects of 10 mm were created on the left limb of 24 rabbits. The animals were randomly assigned to four groups based on the type of defect filling: control (no filler), A-PRF+, coccygeal, and rib. Diagnostic imaging modalities, including X-rays and computed tomography (CT), with macro- and micro-histopathological examinations, were employed for postoperative assessment at 6 weeks (<i>n</i> = 3) and 12 weeks (<i>n</i> = 3), respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The statistical analysis of quantitative bone formation scores of diagnostic imaging and histopathology at 6 weeks postoperatively demonstrated fundamental significance differences between the rib and control groups and the coccygeal and control groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The radiographic scoring method at 6 weeks indicated a statistically significant difference between the rib and A-PRF+ groups (p < 0.01), in addition to the coccygeal and A-PRF+ groups (<i>p</i> < 0.01). In the CT evaluation, a significant difference was observed between the rib and A-PRF+ groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). All A-PRF+ quantitatively assessed methods exhibited no statistically significant difference between the A-PRF+ and control groups at 6 weeks postoperatively. At 12 weeks, the A-PRF+, coccygeal, and rib groups presented substantial differences from the control group as evidenced by X-rays, CT scans, and macro- and micro-histopathological analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implantation of autograft rib and coccygeal bone to treat radial bone defects proved a significantly enhanced capacity for promoting bone ingrowth. In addition, coccygeal vertebrae serve as a viable alternative source for bone autografts in veterinary surgery. The efficacy of A-PRF+ enhanced osseous regeneration in treated radial bone defects, but it remained inferior to rib and coccygeal autografts.</p>","PeriodicalId":19531,"journal":{"name":"Open Veterinary Journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"325-338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11910297/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of autogenous bone grafts on the regeneration of radial bone defects in rabbits compared to autogenous advanced platelet-rich fibrin plus.\",\"authors\":\"Taher N Elmeshreghi, Fathy D El-Seddawy, Mohamed Gomaa, Mustafa Abd El Raouf, Shimaa A Ezzeldein\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/OVJ.2024.v15.i1.31\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bone grafts are an established treatment performed for managing segmental bone defects resulting from tumors, infections, high-energy trauma, congenital deformities, and nonunion.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the regenerative potential following the sole implantation of rib, coccygeal, and advanced platelet-rich fibrin plus (A-PRF+) autografts to repair radial bone defects in rabbits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Radial mid-shaft defects of 10 mm were created on the left limb of 24 rabbits. The animals were randomly assigned to four groups based on the type of defect filling: control (no filler), A-PRF+, coccygeal, and rib. Diagnostic imaging modalities, including X-rays and computed tomography (CT), with macro- and micro-histopathological examinations, were employed for postoperative assessment at 6 weeks (<i>n</i> = 3) and 12 weeks (<i>n</i> = 3), respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The statistical analysis of quantitative bone formation scores of diagnostic imaging and histopathology at 6 weeks postoperatively demonstrated fundamental significance differences between the rib and control groups and the coccygeal and control groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The radiographic scoring method at 6 weeks indicated a statistically significant difference between the rib and A-PRF+ groups (p < 0.01), in addition to the coccygeal and A-PRF+ groups (<i>p</i> < 0.01). In the CT evaluation, a significant difference was observed between the rib and A-PRF+ groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). All A-PRF+ quantitatively assessed methods exhibited no statistically significant difference between the A-PRF+ and control groups at 6 weeks postoperatively. At 12 weeks, the A-PRF+, coccygeal, and rib groups presented substantial differences from the control group as evidenced by X-rays, CT scans, and macro- and micro-histopathological analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implantation of autograft rib and coccygeal bone to treat radial bone defects proved a significantly enhanced capacity for promoting bone ingrowth. In addition, coccygeal vertebrae serve as a viable alternative source for bone autografts in veterinary surgery. The efficacy of A-PRF+ enhanced osseous regeneration in treated radial bone defects, but it remained inferior to rib and coccygeal autografts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19531,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Veterinary Journal\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"325-338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11910297/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Veterinary Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/OVJ.2024.v15.i1.31\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/OVJ.2024.v15.i1.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骨移植是治疗由肿瘤、感染、高能创伤、先天性畸形和骨不连引起的节段性骨缺损的一种成熟的治疗方法。目的:探讨兔肋、尾骨和晚期富血小板纤维蛋白+ (A-PRF+)自体骨移植修复兔桡骨缺损的再生潜力。方法:在24只家兔左肢制造10 mm的桡骨中轴缺损。动物根据缺损填充类型随机分为四组:对照组(无填充物)、A-PRF+、尾骨和肋骨。术后评估分别在6周(n = 3)和12周(n = 3)采用诊断成像方式,包括x射线和计算机断层扫描(CT),以及宏观和微观组织病理学检查。结果:术后6周诊断影像学及组织病理学定量成骨评分统计分析显示,肋部组与对照组、尾骨组与对照组间差异有根本意义(p < 0.05)。6周x线评分法显示肋骨组和a - prf +组之间差异有统计学意义(p < 0.01),尾骨组和a - prf +组之间差异有统计学意义(p < 0.01)。在CT评价中,肋组与a - prf +组比较差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。所有A-PRF+定量评估方法在术后6周A-PRF+与对照组之间均无统计学差异。12周时,x射线、CT扫描以及宏观和微观组织病理学分析证明,A-PRF+组、尾骨组和肋骨组与对照组存在显著差异。结论:自体肋尾骨植入治疗桡骨缺损,促进骨长入能力明显增强。此外,尾椎骨是兽医外科中自体骨移植的可行替代来源。A-PRF+增强桡骨缺损骨再生的效果,但仍不如肋骨和尾骨自体移植物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of autogenous bone grafts on the regeneration of radial bone defects in rabbits compared to autogenous advanced platelet-rich fibrin plus.

Background: Bone grafts are an established treatment performed for managing segmental bone defects resulting from tumors, infections, high-energy trauma, congenital deformities, and nonunion.

Aim: To determine the regenerative potential following the sole implantation of rib, coccygeal, and advanced platelet-rich fibrin plus (A-PRF+) autografts to repair radial bone defects in rabbits.

Methods: Radial mid-shaft defects of 10 mm were created on the left limb of 24 rabbits. The animals were randomly assigned to four groups based on the type of defect filling: control (no filler), A-PRF+, coccygeal, and rib. Diagnostic imaging modalities, including X-rays and computed tomography (CT), with macro- and micro-histopathological examinations, were employed for postoperative assessment at 6 weeks (n = 3) and 12 weeks (n = 3), respectively.

Results: The statistical analysis of quantitative bone formation scores of diagnostic imaging and histopathology at 6 weeks postoperatively demonstrated fundamental significance differences between the rib and control groups and the coccygeal and control groups (p < 0.05). The radiographic scoring method at 6 weeks indicated a statistically significant difference between the rib and A-PRF+ groups (p < 0.01), in addition to the coccygeal and A-PRF+ groups (p < 0.01). In the CT evaluation, a significant difference was observed between the rib and A-PRF+ groups (p < 0.05). All A-PRF+ quantitatively assessed methods exhibited no statistically significant difference between the A-PRF+ and control groups at 6 weeks postoperatively. At 12 weeks, the A-PRF+, coccygeal, and rib groups presented substantial differences from the control group as evidenced by X-rays, CT scans, and macro- and micro-histopathological analyses.

Conclusion: The implantation of autograft rib and coccygeal bone to treat radial bone defects proved a significantly enhanced capacity for promoting bone ingrowth. In addition, coccygeal vertebrae serve as a viable alternative source for bone autografts in veterinary surgery. The efficacy of A-PRF+ enhanced osseous regeneration in treated radial bone defects, but it remained inferior to rib and coccygeal autografts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Veterinary Journal
Open Veterinary Journal VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Veterinary Journal is a peer-reviewed international open access online and printed journal that publishes high-quality original research articles. reviews, short communications and case reports dedicated to all aspects of veterinary sciences and its related subjects. Research areas include the following: Infectious diseases of zoonotic/food-borne importance, applied biochemistry, parasitology, endocrinology, microbiology, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, epidemiology, molecular biology, immunogenetics, surgery, ophthalmology, dermatology, oncology and animal reproduction. All papers are peer-reviewed. Moreover, with the presence of well-qualified group of international referees, the process of publication will be done meticulously and to the highest standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信