测量年龄对中央凹周围对比度抑制的影响。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1111/opo.13488
Martin T W Scott, Alex R Wade, Heidi A Baseler
{"title":"测量年龄对中央凹周围对比度抑制的影响。","authors":"Martin T W Scott, Alex R Wade, Heidi A Baseler","doi":"10.1111/opo.13488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The apparent contrast of a visible central grating can be reduced by the presence of a surrounding grating-an effect known as surround suppression of contrast. Surround suppression is strong when the orientation of the surround matches that of the central probe and is strongest in the periphery. There is evidence that surround suppression at the fovea increases in strength with age, and that the orientation dependence of surround suppression is weakened. However, the range of visual stimuli that can produce this effect (and the implicated underlying mechanisms) requires further examination. This study aimed to characterise surround suppression at the fovea and its dependence on age. Visual stimuli with previously unexplored spatiotemporal parameters were used, designed to minimise contributions from spatially short-range overlay masking and temporally transient masking mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 20 younger (<30 years) and 17 older (>60 years) observers, psychophysical contrast-matching thresholds were measured using stimuli centred on the fovea. Grating stimuli were presented with either no surround, a collinearly oriented surround or an orthogonally oriented surround. Using a staircase procedure, observers matched the contrast of these central target stimuli to the contrast of a separate reference stimulus. The points of subjective equality between target and reference stimuli were compared between the two surround orientations and between younger and older age groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all observers, weak foveal surround suppression was found that had little orientation tuning. No evidence for the strength of surround suppression increasing with age is reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that the age-related effects of surround suppression may be dependent on the spatiotemporal parameters of the stimulus used and encourage further exploration of the contrast masking mechanisms affected by age. The mild and weakly orientation-tuned suppression may have been produced by a weak and temporally sustained suppression mechanism.</p>","PeriodicalId":19522,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","volume":" ","pages":"644-655"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring the effects of age on foveal surround suppression of contrast.\",\"authors\":\"Martin T W Scott, Alex R Wade, Heidi A Baseler\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/opo.13488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The apparent contrast of a visible central grating can be reduced by the presence of a surrounding grating-an effect known as surround suppression of contrast. Surround suppression is strong when the orientation of the surround matches that of the central probe and is strongest in the periphery. There is evidence that surround suppression at the fovea increases in strength with age, and that the orientation dependence of surround suppression is weakened. However, the range of visual stimuli that can produce this effect (and the implicated underlying mechanisms) requires further examination. This study aimed to characterise surround suppression at the fovea and its dependence on age. Visual stimuli with previously unexplored spatiotemporal parameters were used, designed to minimise contributions from spatially short-range overlay masking and temporally transient masking mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 20 younger (<30 years) and 17 older (>60 years) observers, psychophysical contrast-matching thresholds were measured using stimuli centred on the fovea. Grating stimuli were presented with either no surround, a collinearly oriented surround or an orthogonally oriented surround. Using a staircase procedure, observers matched the contrast of these central target stimuli to the contrast of a separate reference stimulus. The points of subjective equality between target and reference stimuli were compared between the two surround orientations and between younger and older age groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all observers, weak foveal surround suppression was found that had little orientation tuning. No evidence for the strength of surround suppression increasing with age is reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that the age-related effects of surround suppression may be dependent on the spatiotemporal parameters of the stimulus used and encourage further exploration of the contrast masking mechanisms affected by age. The mild and weakly orientation-tuned suppression may have been produced by a weak and temporally sustained suppression mechanism.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"644-655\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13488\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13488","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:一个可见的中心光栅的明显对比度可以被周围光栅的存在所降低,这种效果被称为环绕对比度抑制。当环绕声的方向与中心探头的方向相匹配时,环绕声的抑制作用较强,而在外围则最强。有证据表明,随着年龄的增长,中央凹周围抑制的强度增加,并且周围抑制的方向依赖性减弱。然而,能够产生这种效果的视觉刺激的范围(以及涉及的潜在机制)需要进一步研究。本研究旨在描述中央凹周围抑制及其与年龄的关系。使用具有以前未探索的时空参数的视觉刺激,旨在最大限度地减少空间短距离覆盖掩蔽和时间瞬态掩蔽机制的贡献。方法:在20名年轻(60岁)的观察者中,使用以中央凹为中心的刺激测量心理物理对比匹配阈值。光栅刺激被呈现为无环绕、共线定向环绕或正交定向环绕。使用阶梯程序,观察者将这些中心目标刺激的对比度与单独参考刺激的对比度相匹配。比较了两种周围取向、低龄组和老年组的目标刺激和参考刺激的主观平等点。结果:在所有观察者中,发现微弱的中央凹周围抑制几乎没有方向调谐。没有证据表明包围抑制强度随年龄增长而增加。结论:这些研究结果表明,环绕抑制的年龄相关效应可能取决于所使用刺激的时空参数,并鼓励进一步探索年龄影响的对比掩蔽机制。这种微弱的定向调谐抑制可能是由微弱的、暂时持续的抑制机制产生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring the effects of age on foveal surround suppression of contrast.

Purpose: The apparent contrast of a visible central grating can be reduced by the presence of a surrounding grating-an effect known as surround suppression of contrast. Surround suppression is strong when the orientation of the surround matches that of the central probe and is strongest in the periphery. There is evidence that surround suppression at the fovea increases in strength with age, and that the orientation dependence of surround suppression is weakened. However, the range of visual stimuli that can produce this effect (and the implicated underlying mechanisms) requires further examination. This study aimed to characterise surround suppression at the fovea and its dependence on age. Visual stimuli with previously unexplored spatiotemporal parameters were used, designed to minimise contributions from spatially short-range overlay masking and temporally transient masking mechanisms.

Methods: In 20 younger (<30 years) and 17 older (>60 years) observers, psychophysical contrast-matching thresholds were measured using stimuli centred on the fovea. Grating stimuli were presented with either no surround, a collinearly oriented surround or an orthogonally oriented surround. Using a staircase procedure, observers matched the contrast of these central target stimuli to the contrast of a separate reference stimulus. The points of subjective equality between target and reference stimuli were compared between the two surround orientations and between younger and older age groups.

Results: Across all observers, weak foveal surround suppression was found that had little orientation tuning. No evidence for the strength of surround suppression increasing with age is reported.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that the age-related effects of surround suppression may be dependent on the spatiotemporal parameters of the stimulus used and encourage further exploration of the contrast masking mechanisms affected by age. The mild and weakly orientation-tuned suppression may have been produced by a weak and temporally sustained suppression mechanism.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.80%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, first published in 1925, is a leading international interdisciplinary journal that addresses basic and applied questions pertinent to contemporary research in vision science and optometry. OPO publishes original research papers, technical notes, reviews and letters and will interest researchers, educators and clinicians concerned with the development, use and restoration of vision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信