宫腔镜患者拔管时异丙酚和瑞芬太尼血浆及效应位点浓度参考值的评价。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-03-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S486147
Yu Wei, Jianwei Wang, Zifeng Xu, Rui Ma
{"title":"宫腔镜患者拔管时异丙酚和瑞芬太尼血浆及效应位点浓度参考值的评价。","authors":"Yu Wei, Jianwei Wang, Zifeng Xu, Rui Ma","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S486147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to assess the correlation of plasma concentration (Cp) and effect-site concentration (Ce) of propofol and remifentanil with level of consciousness and evaluate their reference values during extubation in patients scheduled day-case operative hysteroscopy under propofol-remifentanil anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Propofol (Marsh model) and remifentanil (Minto model) were simultaneously administered using a target-controlled infusion (TCI) pump for the induction and maintenance of anesthesia. The Cp and Ce of propofol (PCp and PCe) and remifentanil (RCp and RCe) before anesthesia induction, at the end of surgery, and at the time of extubation were respectively recorded. Predictive performance was assessed using the jackknife method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the time of extubation, PCp was 1.17 ± 0.168 (95% CI: 1.14-1.20 μg/mL), PCe was 1.7 ± 0.212 (95% CI: 1.65-1.74 μg/mL), RCp was 0.769 ± 0.12 (95% CI: 0.75-0.79μg/mL), and RCe was 0.972 ± 0.179 (95% CI: 0.94 -1.01 μg/mL). The P<sub>k</sub> values of PCp, PCe, RCp and RCe were 0.999, 0.993, 1.00 and 0.995, separately. Postoperative decreases in PCp (r = 0.089, p < 0.001), PCe (r = 0.087, p= 0.001), RCp (r = 0.072, p < 0.000) and RCe (r = 0.077, p < 0.001) were significantly correlated with the recovery time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCp, PCe, RCp and RCe, together with OAA/S Scale and the recovery of spontaneous respiration might be potential reference indicators for extubation in day-surgery hysteroscopy following general anesthesia using TCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"1211-1219"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11910934/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Evaluation of Reference Values of Plasma and Effect-Site Concentrations of Propofol and Remifentanil During Extubation in Patients Who Had Hysteroscopy Procedures.\",\"authors\":\"Yu Wei, Jianwei Wang, Zifeng Xu, Rui Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JPR.S486147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to assess the correlation of plasma concentration (Cp) and effect-site concentration (Ce) of propofol and remifentanil with level of consciousness and evaluate their reference values during extubation in patients scheduled day-case operative hysteroscopy under propofol-remifentanil anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Propofol (Marsh model) and remifentanil (Minto model) were simultaneously administered using a target-controlled infusion (TCI) pump for the induction and maintenance of anesthesia. The Cp and Ce of propofol (PCp and PCe) and remifentanil (RCp and RCe) before anesthesia induction, at the end of surgery, and at the time of extubation were respectively recorded. Predictive performance was assessed using the jackknife method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the time of extubation, PCp was 1.17 ± 0.168 (95% CI: 1.14-1.20 μg/mL), PCe was 1.7 ± 0.212 (95% CI: 1.65-1.74 μg/mL), RCp was 0.769 ± 0.12 (95% CI: 0.75-0.79μg/mL), and RCe was 0.972 ± 0.179 (95% CI: 0.94 -1.01 μg/mL). The P<sub>k</sub> values of PCp, PCe, RCp and RCe were 0.999, 0.993, 1.00 and 0.995, separately. Postoperative decreases in PCp (r = 0.089, p < 0.001), PCe (r = 0.087, p= 0.001), RCp (r = 0.072, p < 0.000) and RCe (r = 0.077, p < 0.001) were significantly correlated with the recovery time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCp, PCe, RCp and RCe, together with OAA/S Scale and the recovery of spontaneous respiration might be potential reference indicators for extubation in day-surgery hysteroscopy following general anesthesia using TCI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"1211-1219\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11910934/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S486147\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S486147","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨异丙酚和瑞芬太尼两种药物的血药浓度(Cp)和效应点浓度(Ce)与意识水平的相关性,评价其在异丙酚-瑞芬太尼麻醉下拔管时的参考价值。方法:采用靶控输注(TCI)泵同时给药异丙酚(Marsh模型)和瑞芬太尼(Minto模型),诱导和维持麻醉。分别记录麻醉诱导前、手术结束时、拔管时异丙酚(PCp)和瑞芬太尼(RCp)的Cp和Ce。采用折刀法评估预测性能。结果:拔管时PCp为1.17±0.168 (95% CI: 1.14 ~ 1.20 μg/mL), PCe为1.7±0.212 (95% CI: 1.65 ~ 1.74 μg/mL), RCp为0.769±0.12 (95% CI: 0.75 ~ 0.79μg/mL), RCe为0.972±0.179 (95% CI: 0.94 ~ 1.01 μg/mL)。PCp、PCe、RCp和RCe的Pk值分别为0.999、0.993、1.00和0.995。术后PCp (r = 0.089, p < 0.001)、PCe (r = 0.087, p= 0.001)、RCp (r = 0.072, p < 0.000)、RCe (r = 0.077, p < 0.001)的降低与恢复时间显著相关。结论:PCp、PCe、RCp、RCe与OAA/S评分及自主呼吸恢复情况可作为TCI全麻术后日间宫腔镜拔管的参考指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Evaluation of Reference Values of Plasma and Effect-Site Concentrations of Propofol and Remifentanil During Extubation in Patients Who Had Hysteroscopy Procedures.

Aim: This study aimed to assess the correlation of plasma concentration (Cp) and effect-site concentration (Ce) of propofol and remifentanil with level of consciousness and evaluate their reference values during extubation in patients scheduled day-case operative hysteroscopy under propofol-remifentanil anesthesia.

Methods: Propofol (Marsh model) and remifentanil (Minto model) were simultaneously administered using a target-controlled infusion (TCI) pump for the induction and maintenance of anesthesia. The Cp and Ce of propofol (PCp and PCe) and remifentanil (RCp and RCe) before anesthesia induction, at the end of surgery, and at the time of extubation were respectively recorded. Predictive performance was assessed using the jackknife method.

Results: At the time of extubation, PCp was 1.17 ± 0.168 (95% CI: 1.14-1.20 μg/mL), PCe was 1.7 ± 0.212 (95% CI: 1.65-1.74 μg/mL), RCp was 0.769 ± 0.12 (95% CI: 0.75-0.79μg/mL), and RCe was 0.972 ± 0.179 (95% CI: 0.94 -1.01 μg/mL). The Pk values of PCp, PCe, RCp and RCe were 0.999, 0.993, 1.00 and 0.995, separately. Postoperative decreases in PCp (r = 0.089, p < 0.001), PCe (r = 0.087, p= 0.001), RCp (r = 0.072, p < 0.000) and RCe (r = 0.077, p < 0.001) were significantly correlated with the recovery time.

Conclusion: PCp, PCe, RCp and RCe, together with OAA/S Scale and the recovery of spontaneous respiration might be potential reference indicators for extubation in day-surgery hysteroscopy following general anesthesia using TCI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信