人工耳蜗手术。意大利耳鼻咽喉学会(SIOeChCF)和意大利听力学和声学学会(SIAF)的意大利临床实践指南。第1部分:成人人工耳蜗。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Stefano Berrettini, Domenico Cuda, Silvia Minozzi, Franca Artioli, Umberto Barbieri, Cristian Borghi, Eliana Cristofari, Giorgio Conte, Davide Cornolti, Diego di Lisi, Anna Rita Fetoni, Simona Fiori, Elisabetta Genovese, Giorgia Girotto, Marinella Majorano, Pasquale Marsella, Emanuele Marzetti, Maria Nicastri, Gaetano Paludetti, Nicola Quaranta, Patrizia Trevisi, Diego Zanetti, Michela Cinquini, Francesca Forli, Sara Ghiselli
{"title":"人工耳蜗手术。意大利耳鼻咽喉学会(SIOeChCF)和意大利听力学和声学学会(SIAF)的意大利临床实践指南。第1部分:成人人工耳蜗。","authors":"Stefano Berrettini, Domenico Cuda, Silvia Minozzi, Franca Artioli, Umberto Barbieri, Cristian Borghi, Eliana Cristofari, Giorgio Conte, Davide Cornolti, Diego di Lisi, Anna Rita Fetoni, Simona Fiori, Elisabetta Genovese, Giorgia Girotto, Marinella Majorano, Pasquale Marsella, Emanuele Marzetti, Maria Nicastri, Gaetano Paludetti, Nicola Quaranta, Patrizia Trevisi, Diego Zanetti, Michela Cinquini, Francesca Forli, Sara Ghiselli","doi":"10.14639/0392-100X-N3081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cochlear implant (CI) is a well-established treatment for adults with sensorineural hearing loss and without benefit from hearing aids. The Italian guidelines date back 15 years; given the expansion of indications for CI, including single side deafness and asymmetrical hearing loss, it became necessary to establish updated guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen experts and 2 patient representatives selected the key questions and drew up recommendations. The document was developed following GRADE methodology. The methodological team of the Mario Negri Pharmacological Research Institute performed systematic reviews for each question and supported the overall process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five key questions were identified and recommendations formulated, with subgroups and considerations on implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Though the systematic research of scientific literature found a scarcity of randomised trials and an overall poor conduct and reporting quality of primary studies and systematic reviews, strong or conditional recommendations in favour of CI have been formulated for different subgroups of patients. Further studies should enrol a larger number of participants and use consistent instruments to evaluate hearing outcomes, in order to increase the comparability of results and data pooling with meta-analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":6890,"journal":{"name":"Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica","volume":"45 1","pages":"47-57"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cochlear implant procedure. Italian Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Italian Society of Otorhinolaryngology (SIOeChCF) and Italian Society of Audiology and Phoniatrics (SIAF). Part 1: cochlear implants in adults.\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Berrettini, Domenico Cuda, Silvia Minozzi, Franca Artioli, Umberto Barbieri, Cristian Borghi, Eliana Cristofari, Giorgio Conte, Davide Cornolti, Diego di Lisi, Anna Rita Fetoni, Simona Fiori, Elisabetta Genovese, Giorgia Girotto, Marinella Majorano, Pasquale Marsella, Emanuele Marzetti, Maria Nicastri, Gaetano Paludetti, Nicola Quaranta, Patrizia Trevisi, Diego Zanetti, Michela Cinquini, Francesca Forli, Sara Ghiselli\",\"doi\":\"10.14639/0392-100X-N3081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cochlear implant (CI) is a well-established treatment for adults with sensorineural hearing loss and without benefit from hearing aids. The Italian guidelines date back 15 years; given the expansion of indications for CI, including single side deafness and asymmetrical hearing loss, it became necessary to establish updated guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen experts and 2 patient representatives selected the key questions and drew up recommendations. The document was developed following GRADE methodology. The methodological team of the Mario Negri Pharmacological Research Institute performed systematic reviews for each question and supported the overall process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five key questions were identified and recommendations formulated, with subgroups and considerations on implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Though the systematic research of scientific literature found a scarcity of randomised trials and an overall poor conduct and reporting quality of primary studies and systematic reviews, strong or conditional recommendations in favour of CI have been formulated for different subgroups of patients. Further studies should enrol a larger number of participants and use consistent instruments to evaluate hearing outcomes, in order to increase the comparability of results and data pooling with meta-analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"47-57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924192/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N3081\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N3081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:人工耳蜗(CI)是一种成熟的治疗成人感音神经性听力损失,没有助听器的好处。意大利的指导方针可以追溯到15年前;鉴于CI适应症的扩大,包括单侧耳聋和不对称听力损失,有必要制定更新的指南。方法:13名专家和2名患者代表选择重点问题并提出建议。该文件是按照GRADE方法开发的。Mario Negri药理学研究所的方法学团队对每个问题进行了系统的审查,并支持整个过程。结果:确定了五个关键问题并制定了建议,并对实施进行了分组和考虑。结论:尽管对科学文献的系统研究发现,随机试验缺乏,初级研究和系统评价的总体行为和报告质量较差,但对于不同的亚组患者,已经制定了支持CI的强烈或有条件的建议。进一步的研究应该招募更多的参与者,并使用一致的仪器来评估听力结果,以增加结果的可比性,并通过荟萃分析汇集数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cochlear implant procedure. Italian Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Italian Society of Otorhinolaryngology (SIOeChCF) and Italian Society of Audiology and Phoniatrics (SIAF). Part 1: cochlear implants in adults.

Objective: Cochlear implant (CI) is a well-established treatment for adults with sensorineural hearing loss and without benefit from hearing aids. The Italian guidelines date back 15 years; given the expansion of indications for CI, including single side deafness and asymmetrical hearing loss, it became necessary to establish updated guidelines.

Methods: Thirteen experts and 2 patient representatives selected the key questions and drew up recommendations. The document was developed following GRADE methodology. The methodological team of the Mario Negri Pharmacological Research Institute performed systematic reviews for each question and supported the overall process.

Results: Five key questions were identified and recommendations formulated, with subgroups and considerations on implementation.

Conclusions: Though the systematic research of scientific literature found a scarcity of randomised trials and an overall poor conduct and reporting quality of primary studies and systematic reviews, strong or conditional recommendations in favour of CI have been formulated for different subgroups of patients. Further studies should enrol a larger number of participants and use consistent instruments to evaluate hearing outcomes, in order to increase the comparability of results and data pooling with meta-analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica
Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica first appeared as “Annali di Laringologia Otologia e Faringologia” and was founded in 1901 by Giulio Masini. It is the official publication of the Italian Hospital Otology Association (A.O.O.I.) and, since 1976, also of the Società Italiana di Otorinolaringoiatria e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale (S.I.O.Ch.C.-F.). The journal publishes original articles (clinical trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional surveys, and diagnostic test assessments) of interest in the field of otorhinolaryngology as well as clinical techniques and technology (a short report of unique or original methods for surgical techniques, medical management or new devices or technology), editorials (including editorial guests – special contribution) and letters to the Editor-in-Chief. Articles concerning science investigations and well prepared systematic reviews (including meta-analyses) on themes related to basic science, clinical otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery have high priority.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信