Andrea Y. Gu, Tet Woo Lee, Aziza Khan, Xuenan Zhang, Francis W. Hunter, Dean C. Singleton, Stephen M. F. Jamieson
{"title":"全基因组CRISPR-Cas9敲除筛选鉴定出在nras突变黑色素瘤中,SHOC2是一种遗传依赖性。","authors":"Andrea Y. Gu, Tet Woo Lee, Aziza Khan, Xuenan Zhang, Francis W. Hunter, Dean C. Singleton, Stephen M. F. Jamieson","doi":"10.1002/cac2.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mutations in the oncogene <i>NRAS</i> that induce constitutive RAS-GTPase activity lead to unchecked cell proliferation and migration through downstream activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) signalling pathways [<span>1</span>]. These mutations occur in approximately 20% of melanomas and very rarely coexist with <i>BRAF</i> V600 mutations. <i>NRAS</i>-mutant melanoma is associated with poor survival [<span>2</span>] and represents an unmet clinical need, with no effective therapies available following immunotherapy failure.</p><p>Identification of contextual essential genes that exert stronger fitness effects on <i>NRAS</i>-mutant melanoma cells presents an opportunity for the discovery of targeted therapies. In this study, we employed CRISPR-Cas9-mediated whole-genome dropout screens to identify genetic dependencies in <i>NRAS</i>-mutant melanoma. Typically, melanoma cell lines are cultured under ambient (∼20%) O<sub>2</sub> conditions, despite O<sub>2</sub> concentrations of < 8% at the epidermal-dermal junction where melanocytes reside, resulting in adaptations in gene and protein expression [<span>3</span>]. Therefore, for our screens, we used a panel of early-passage New Zealand Melanoma (NZM) cell lines that were established and cultured under physiological (5%) O<sub>2</sub> conditions [<span>4</span>].</p><p>Six <i>NRAS</i>-mutant and seven <i>NRAS</i>-wildtype (five <i>BRAF</i>-mutant, two <i>BRAF</i>/<i>NRAS</i>/<i>NF1</i>-wildtype) NZM cell lines (Supplementary Table S1) were transduced in multiple replicates with the Brunello single guide RNA (sgRNA) library at a multiplicity of infection of approximately 0.3 and screened at 5% O<sub>2</sub> for up to 35 days (Supplementary Methods and Materials). All NZM lines were cultured for transduction at fewer than 10 passages from derivation. The representation of the sgRNA libraries was assessed to evaluate transducibility, with any cell lines exhibiting poor sgRNA representation (< 80% of sgRNAs detected with ≥1 count) excluded from further analyses (Supplementary Table S2). Moderate to high representation was observed in nine of the 13 NZM cell lines, whereas four cell lines were excluded due to < 80% of sgRNAs being detected (Figure 1A). Reduced sgRNA representation was accompanied by dropout of non-targeting control (NTC) sgRNAs (Figure 1A), greater read count inequality (Supplementary Figure S1, Supplementary Table S2) and reduced correlation with the Brunello library plasmids and between individual cell line replicates (Supplementary Figure S2), suggesting stochastic evolution rather than knockout-induced fitness effects.</p><p>We used BAGEL2 to estimate gene essentiality relative to reference sets of common essential and nonessential genes. Typically, tissue-agnostic gene sets are used for this purpose [<span>5</span>], but we established a combined essential gene set incorporating both tissue-agnostic and melanoma-specific essential genes (Supplementary Table S3) that demonstrated high precision-recall (Supplementary Figure S3A), with a distinctive separation between the distributions of common essential and nonessential genes in NZM37 cells (Figure 1B, Supplementary Figure S3B). Supplementing tissue-agnostic genes with tissue-specific genes can broaden the pool of common essential genes and enhance the sensitivity of BAGEL2 analysis, making it a valuable consideration when designing CRISPR dropout screens. BAGEL2 analysis using the combined essential gene set revealed differences in the distribution of common essential and nonessential genes across the NZM cell lines (Supplementary Figure S4). Cell lines with high sgRNA representation exhibited a distinct separation between the distributions of common essential and nonessential genes (Figure 1C), whereas the four excluded lines and NZM74 showed > 60% overlap in gene set distributions (Supplementary Table S4).</p><p>Comparative analysis between the five <i>NRAS</i>-mutant and four <i>NRAS</i>-wildtype cell lines revealed 59 candidate genes that were significantly more essential in <i>NRAS</i>-mutant melanoma cell lines than in <i>NRAS</i>-wildtype cell lines (<i>P</i> < 0.01; Supplementary Table S5). As expected, given its oncogenic role, <i>NRAS</i> was the top hit, validating our approach for identifying genetic dependencies in <i>NRAS</i>-mutant melanoma. The next most prominent hit was <i>SHOC2</i>, a positive regulator of MAPK signalling (Figure 1D).</p><p>To verify our findings, we conducted BAGEL2 analysis of 54 melanoma cell lines screened with the whole-genome Avana sgRNA library for 21 days at 20% O<sub>2</sub>, using data extracted from DepMap 24Q2 (Supplementary Table S1). Since DepMap applies stringent criteria for screen quality, the Avana melanoma screens exhibited high sgRNA representation (Supplementary Table S6), with less than 30% overlap between the reference gene set distributions in all but two cases (Supplementary Figure S5, Supplementary Table S7). Consistent with the NZM screens, the top two ranked genes that were significantly more essential in <i>NRAS</i>-mutant than in <i>NRAS</i>-wildtype cell lines were <i>NRAS</i> and <i>SHOC2</i> (Figure 1E-F). Moreover, these were the only genes that ranked in the top 30 across both sets of screens (Supplementary Table S5). Reactome pathway analysis revealed an over-representation of genes related to DNA repair, RNA metabolism, translation, and ribosomal RNA processing, but not MAPK signalling (Supplementary Figure S6).</p><p>To confirm its genetic dependency in <i>NRAS</i>-mutant melanoma cells, <i>SHOC2</i> was individually knocked out in three <i>NRAS</i>-mutant and three <i>NRAS</i>-wildtype NZM cell lines. Reduced cell proliferation, relative to either nonessential gene knockout cells or NTC cells, was observed following <i>SHOC2</i> depletion with three separate sgRNA in all replicate transductions of the <i>NRAS</i>-mutant cell lines (Figure 1G, Supplementary Figure S7). In contrast, <i>SHOC2</i> knockout did not impair the proliferation of <i>NRAS</i>-wildtype cells, which grew similarly to nonessential gene knockout and/or NTC cells (Figure 1H). By day 28, <i>SHOC2</i>-knockout <i>NRAS</i>-mutant cell lines exhibited significantly reduced growth compared to NTC cells for at least two of the three <i>SHOC2</i> sgRNAs in each cell line, while no significant differences were observed in <i>NRAS</i>-wildtype cell lines (Supplementary Figure S8).</p><p>Additionally, <i>SHOC2</i> knockout was associated with reduced ERK phosphorylation at day 28 in two <i>NRAS</i>-mutant NZM17 replicates but not in <i>NRAS</i>-wildtype NZM37 cells (Figure 1I). As pooled knockouts, the third NZM17 replicate population had regained some SHOC2 expression by day 28. However, at earlier timepoints, it showed no detectable SHOC2 expression and exhibited reductions in ERK phosphorylation similar to those observed in the 28-day NZM17 R1 and R2 cultures, as well as in <i>SHOC2</i>-wildtype cells treated with the RAF dimer inhibitor belvarafenib (Supplementary Figure S9). To confirm that the effect of <i>SHOC2</i> knockout was not limited to NZM cells under physiological oxygen conditions, we transduced SK-MEL-2 <i>NRAS</i>-mutant melanoma cells with three <i>SHOC2</i> sgRNAs and observed similar reductions in cell proliferation and ERK phosphorylation, comparable to those seen in <i>NRAS</i>-mutant but not <i>NRAS</i>-wildtype NZM cell lines. Additionally, <i>SHOC2</i> knockout increased sensitivity to the RAF dimer inhibitors belvarafenib and naporafenib (Supplementary Figure S10).</p><p>Although <i>SHOC2</i> knockout reduced proliferation over 28 days in <i>NRAS</i>-mutant but not <i>NRAS</i>-wildtype cultures, we cannot confirm whether these effects are maintained long-term or in vivo. While <i>SHOC2</i> depletion has been reported to prevent tumour growth in <i>KRAS</i>-mutant pancreatic and lung tumour xenografts [<span>6, 7</span>], such studies were not attempted here. In pooled knockout cultures, positive selection of cells expressing <i>SHOC2</i>—due to their growth advantage—could occur either in vitro or in vivo [<span>8</span>], potentially underestimating the true impact of <i>SHOC2</i> knockout on <i>NRAS</i>-mutant tumour growth. This issue could be mitigated by using clonal knockouts; however, these clones would likely have very slow growth, if any at all.</p><p>SHOC2 plays a critical role in the regulation of MAPK signalling by forming a holophosphatase complex with MRAS and PP1C, which activates RAF proteins through dephosphorylation at an inhibitory phosphorylation site [<span>9</span>]. The induced essentiality of SHOC2 specifically in <i>NRAS</i>-mutant cells likely reflects their dependence on constitutive MAPK signalling for cell survival (oncogene addiction), in contrast to <i>NRAS</i>-wildtype cells [<span>1</span>]. Additionally, mutant NRAS may substitute for MRAS in the SHOC2-RAS-PP1C complex and, due to its constitutive activity, promote activation of RAF to a greater extent than the SHOC2-MRAS-PP1C complex does in <i>NRAS</i>-wildtype cells [<span>10</span>]. <i>SHOC2</i> has previously been identified as a genetic dependency in other <i>RAS</i>-related cancers [<span>6, 7</span>], and now our study suggests it could also be a promising therapeutic target for <i>NRAS</i>-mutant melanoma.</p><p>Some of the NZM screens were adversely affected by poor sgRNA representation, which limited the ability to distinguish known essential and nonessential genes. The lack of high concordance among replicate libraries within the same cell line likely reflects the heterogeneity present in early-passage NZM cell lines. While early-passage status preserves tumour heterogeneity and enhances clinical relevance, cell lines with greater heterogeneity may be more susceptible to clonal evolution over the screening period, as different cell populations grow at varying rates, leading to random clonal expansion and dropout —similar to what we have observed in in vivo screens [<span>8</span>]. This issue may have been further compounded by physiological O<sub>2</sub> levels, which not only slowed proliferation and necessitated longer duration screens, but also reduced transduction efficiency. Nonetheless, this raises an important dilemma in the design of functional genomics screens regarding prioritisation of clinical relevance versus high sgRNA representation and reproducibility. By analysing two independent datasets, our study aimed to balance both priorities.</p><p>In summary, whole-genome CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screens in early-passage NZM cell lines grown under physiological O<sub>2</sub> identified <i>SHOC2</i> as a genetic vulnerability in <i>NRAS</i>-mutant but not <i>NRAS</i>-wildtype melanoma cells. This finding was subsequently validated through analysis of whole-genome DepMap melanoma screens, and through individual <i>SHOC2</i> knockout, which resulted in reduced proliferation and ERK phosphorylation in <i>NRAS</i>-mutant melanoma cell lines. Our results highlight the potential of SHOC2 as a therapeutic target for the unmet clinical need of <i>NRAS</i>-mutant melanoma.</p><p>Conceptualisation: Tet Woo Lee, Dean C Singleton, Francis W Hunter, and Stephen MF Jamieson. Data curation: Andrea Y Gu, Tet Woo Lee, Aziza Khan, Xuenan Zhang, and Stephen MF Jamieson. Funding acquisition: Francis W Hunter and Stephen MF Jamieson. Investigation and methodology: all authors. Resources: Andrea Y Gu, Tet Woo Lee, Aziza Khan, and Francis W Hunter. Visualisation: Andrea Y Gu and Stephen MF Jamieson. Supervision: Tet Woo Lee, Dean C Singleton, and Stephen MF Jamieson. Writing–original draft: Andrea Y Gu and Stephen MF Jamieson. Writing–review and editing: all authors.</p><p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p><p>This research was funded by the Cancer Society of New Zealand (18.14), Cancer Research Trust New Zealand (2005-PGS), University of Auckland Genomics into Medicine Strategic Research Initiatives Fund and Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery Flexible Research Programme. Dean C Singleton and Stephen MF Jamieson were supported by Senior Fellowships from the Cancer Society Auckland/Northland.</p><p>Not applicable</p>","PeriodicalId":9495,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Communications","volume":"45 6","pages":"709-713"},"PeriodicalIF":24.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cac2.70013","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whole-genome CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screens identify SHOC2 as a genetic dependency in NRAS-mutant melanoma\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Y. Gu, Tet Woo Lee, Aziza Khan, Xuenan Zhang, Francis W. Hunter, Dean C. Singleton, Stephen M. F. Jamieson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cac2.70013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Mutations in the oncogene <i>NRAS</i> that induce constitutive RAS-GTPase activity lead to unchecked cell proliferation and migration through downstream activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) signalling pathways [<span>1</span>]. These mutations occur in approximately 20% of melanomas and very rarely coexist with <i>BRAF</i> V600 mutations. <i>NRAS</i>-mutant melanoma is associated with poor survival [<span>2</span>] and represents an unmet clinical need, with no effective therapies available following immunotherapy failure.</p><p>Identification of contextual essential genes that exert stronger fitness effects on <i>NRAS</i>-mutant melanoma cells presents an opportunity for the discovery of targeted therapies. In this study, we employed CRISPR-Cas9-mediated whole-genome dropout screens to identify genetic dependencies in <i>NRAS</i>-mutant melanoma. Typically, melanoma cell lines are cultured under ambient (∼20%) O<sub>2</sub> conditions, despite O<sub>2</sub> concentrations of < 8% at the epidermal-dermal junction where melanocytes reside, resulting in adaptations in gene and protein expression [<span>3</span>]. Therefore, for our screens, we used a panel of early-passage New Zealand Melanoma (NZM) cell lines that were established and cultured under physiological (5%) O<sub>2</sub> conditions [<span>4</span>].</p><p>Six <i>NRAS</i>-mutant and seven <i>NRAS</i>-wildtype (five <i>BRAF</i>-mutant, two <i>BRAF</i>/<i>NRAS</i>/<i>NF1</i>-wildtype) NZM cell lines (Supplementary Table S1) were transduced in multiple replicates with the Brunello single guide RNA (sgRNA) library at a multiplicity of infection of approximately 0.3 and screened at 5% O<sub>2</sub> for up to 35 days (Supplementary Methods and Materials). All NZM lines were cultured for transduction at fewer than 10 passages from derivation. The representation of the sgRNA libraries was assessed to evaluate transducibility, with any cell lines exhibiting poor sgRNA representation (< 80% of sgRNAs detected with ≥1 count) excluded from further analyses (Supplementary Table S2). Moderate to high representation was observed in nine of the 13 NZM cell lines, whereas four cell lines were excluded due to < 80% of sgRNAs being detected (Figure 1A). Reduced sgRNA representation was accompanied by dropout of non-targeting control (NTC) sgRNAs (Figure 1A), greater read count inequality (Supplementary Figure S1, Supplementary Table S2) and reduced correlation with the Brunello library plasmids and between individual cell line replicates (Supplementary Figure S2), suggesting stochastic evolution rather than knockout-induced fitness effects.</p><p>We used BAGEL2 to estimate gene essentiality relative to reference sets of common essential and nonessential genes. Typically, tissue-agnostic gene sets are used for this purpose [<span>5</span>], but we established a combined essential gene set incorporating both tissue-agnostic and melanoma-specific essential genes (Supplementary Table S3) that demonstrated high precision-recall (Supplementary Figure S3A), with a distinctive separation between the distributions of common essential and nonessential genes in NZM37 cells (Figure 1B, Supplementary Figure S3B). Supplementing tissue-agnostic genes with tissue-specific genes can broaden the pool of common essential genes and enhance the sensitivity of BAGEL2 analysis, making it a valuable consideration when designing CRISPR dropout screens. BAGEL2 analysis using the combined essential gene set revealed differences in the distribution of common essential and nonessential genes across the NZM cell lines (Supplementary Figure S4). Cell lines with high sgRNA representation exhibited a distinct separation between the distributions of common essential and nonessential genes (Figure 1C), whereas the four excluded lines and NZM74 showed > 60% overlap in gene set distributions (Supplementary Table S4).</p><p>Comparative analysis between the five <i>NRAS</i>-mutant and four <i>NRAS</i>-wildtype cell lines revealed 59 candidate genes that were significantly more essential in <i>NRAS</i>-mutant melanoma cell lines than in <i>NRAS</i>-wildtype cell lines (<i>P</i> < 0.01; Supplementary Table S5). As expected, given its oncogenic role, <i>NRAS</i> was the top hit, validating our approach for identifying genetic dependencies in <i>NRAS</i>-mutant melanoma. The next most prominent hit was <i>SHOC2</i>, a positive regulator of MAPK signalling (Figure 1D).</p><p>To verify our findings, we conducted BAGEL2 analysis of 54 melanoma cell lines screened with the whole-genome Avana sgRNA library for 21 days at 20% O<sub>2</sub>, using data extracted from DepMap 24Q2 (Supplementary Table S1). Since DepMap applies stringent criteria for screen quality, the Avana melanoma screens exhibited high sgRNA representation (Supplementary Table S6), with less than 30% overlap between the reference gene set distributions in all but two cases (Supplementary Figure S5, Supplementary Table S7). Consistent with the NZM screens, the top two ranked genes that were significantly more essential in <i>NRAS</i>-mutant than in <i>NRAS</i>-wildtype cell lines were <i>NRAS</i> and <i>SHOC2</i> (Figure 1E-F). Moreover, these were the only genes that ranked in the top 30 across both sets of screens (Supplementary Table S5). Reactome pathway analysis revealed an over-representation of genes related to DNA repair, RNA metabolism, translation, and ribosomal RNA processing, but not MAPK signalling (Supplementary Figure S6).</p><p>To confirm its genetic dependency in <i>NRAS</i>-mutant melanoma cells, <i>SHOC2</i> was individually knocked out in three <i>NRAS</i>-mutant and three <i>NRAS</i>-wildtype NZM cell lines. Reduced cell proliferation, relative to either nonessential gene knockout cells or NTC cells, was observed following <i>SHOC2</i> depletion with three separate sgRNA in all replicate transductions of the <i>NRAS</i>-mutant cell lines (Figure 1G, Supplementary Figure S7). In contrast, <i>SHOC2</i> knockout did not impair the proliferation of <i>NRAS</i>-wildtype cells, which grew similarly to nonessential gene knockout and/or NTC cells (Figure 1H). By day 28, <i>SHOC2</i>-knockout <i>NRAS</i>-mutant cell lines exhibited significantly reduced growth compared to NTC cells for at least two of the three <i>SHOC2</i> sgRNAs in each cell line, while no significant differences were observed in <i>NRAS</i>-wildtype cell lines (Supplementary Figure S8).</p><p>Additionally, <i>SHOC2</i> knockout was associated with reduced ERK phosphorylation at day 28 in two <i>NRAS</i>-mutant NZM17 replicates but not in <i>NRAS</i>-wildtype NZM37 cells (Figure 1I). As pooled knockouts, the third NZM17 replicate population had regained some SHOC2 expression by day 28. However, at earlier timepoints, it showed no detectable SHOC2 expression and exhibited reductions in ERK phosphorylation similar to those observed in the 28-day NZM17 R1 and R2 cultures, as well as in <i>SHOC2</i>-wildtype cells treated with the RAF dimer inhibitor belvarafenib (Supplementary Figure S9). To confirm that the effect of <i>SHOC2</i> knockout was not limited to NZM cells under physiological oxygen conditions, we transduced SK-MEL-2 <i>NRAS</i>-mutant melanoma cells with three <i>SHOC2</i> sgRNAs and observed similar reductions in cell proliferation and ERK phosphorylation, comparable to those seen in <i>NRAS</i>-mutant but not <i>NRAS</i>-wildtype NZM cell lines. Additionally, <i>SHOC2</i> knockout increased sensitivity to the RAF dimer inhibitors belvarafenib and naporafenib (Supplementary Figure S10).</p><p>Although <i>SHOC2</i> knockout reduced proliferation over 28 days in <i>NRAS</i>-mutant but not <i>NRAS</i>-wildtype cultures, we cannot confirm whether these effects are maintained long-term or in vivo. While <i>SHOC2</i> depletion has been reported to prevent tumour growth in <i>KRAS</i>-mutant pancreatic and lung tumour xenografts [<span>6, 7</span>], such studies were not attempted here. In pooled knockout cultures, positive selection of cells expressing <i>SHOC2</i>—due to their growth advantage—could occur either in vitro or in vivo [<span>8</span>], potentially underestimating the true impact of <i>SHOC2</i> knockout on <i>NRAS</i>-mutant tumour growth. This issue could be mitigated by using clonal knockouts; however, these clones would likely have very slow growth, if any at all.</p><p>SHOC2 plays a critical role in the regulation of MAPK signalling by forming a holophosphatase complex with MRAS and PP1C, which activates RAF proteins through dephosphorylation at an inhibitory phosphorylation site [<span>9</span>]. The induced essentiality of SHOC2 specifically in <i>NRAS</i>-mutant cells likely reflects their dependence on constitutive MAPK signalling for cell survival (oncogene addiction), in contrast to <i>NRAS</i>-wildtype cells [<span>1</span>]. Additionally, mutant NRAS may substitute for MRAS in the SHOC2-RAS-PP1C complex and, due to its constitutive activity, promote activation of RAF to a greater extent than the SHOC2-MRAS-PP1C complex does in <i>NRAS</i>-wildtype cells [<span>10</span>]. <i>SHOC2</i> has previously been identified as a genetic dependency in other <i>RAS</i>-related cancers [<span>6, 7</span>], and now our study suggests it could also be a promising therapeutic target for <i>NRAS</i>-mutant melanoma.</p><p>Some of the NZM screens were adversely affected by poor sgRNA representation, which limited the ability to distinguish known essential and nonessential genes. The lack of high concordance among replicate libraries within the same cell line likely reflects the heterogeneity present in early-passage NZM cell lines. While early-passage status preserves tumour heterogeneity and enhances clinical relevance, cell lines with greater heterogeneity may be more susceptible to clonal evolution over the screening period, as different cell populations grow at varying rates, leading to random clonal expansion and dropout —similar to what we have observed in in vivo screens [<span>8</span>]. This issue may have been further compounded by physiological O<sub>2</sub> levels, which not only slowed proliferation and necessitated longer duration screens, but also reduced transduction efficiency. Nonetheless, this raises an important dilemma in the design of functional genomics screens regarding prioritisation of clinical relevance versus high sgRNA representation and reproducibility. By analysing two independent datasets, our study aimed to balance both priorities.</p><p>In summary, whole-genome CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screens in early-passage NZM cell lines grown under physiological O<sub>2</sub> identified <i>SHOC2</i> as a genetic vulnerability in <i>NRAS</i>-mutant but not <i>NRAS</i>-wildtype melanoma cells. This finding was subsequently validated through analysis of whole-genome DepMap melanoma screens, and through individual <i>SHOC2</i> knockout, which resulted in reduced proliferation and ERK phosphorylation in <i>NRAS</i>-mutant melanoma cell lines. Our results highlight the potential of SHOC2 as a therapeutic target for the unmet clinical need of <i>NRAS</i>-mutant melanoma.</p><p>Conceptualisation: Tet Woo Lee, Dean C Singleton, Francis W Hunter, and Stephen MF Jamieson. Data curation: Andrea Y Gu, Tet Woo Lee, Aziza Khan, Xuenan Zhang, and Stephen MF Jamieson. Funding acquisition: Francis W Hunter and Stephen MF Jamieson. Investigation and methodology: all authors. Resources: Andrea Y Gu, Tet Woo Lee, Aziza Khan, and Francis W Hunter. Visualisation: Andrea Y Gu and Stephen MF Jamieson. Supervision: Tet Woo Lee, Dean C Singleton, and Stephen MF Jamieson. Writing–original draft: Andrea Y Gu and Stephen MF Jamieson. Writing–review and editing: all authors.</p><p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p><p>This research was funded by the Cancer Society of New Zealand (18.14), Cancer Research Trust New Zealand (2005-PGS), University of Auckland Genomics into Medicine Strategic Research Initiatives Fund and Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery Flexible Research Programme. Dean C Singleton and Stephen MF Jamieson were supported by Senior Fellowships from the Cancer Society Auckland/Northland.</p><p>Not applicable</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Communications\",\"volume\":\"45 6\",\"pages\":\"709-713\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":24.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cac2.70013\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cac2.70013\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cac2.70013","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
致癌基因NRAS的突变诱导RAS-GTPase活性,通过下游活化丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(MAPK)和磷酸肌苷激酶(PI3K)信号通路[1],导致细胞增殖和迁移不受控制。这些突变发生在大约20%的黑色素瘤中,很少与BRAF V600突变共存。nras突变黑色素瘤与低生存率[2]相关,代表了未满足的临床需求,在免疫治疗失败后没有有效的治疗方法。鉴定对nras突变黑色素瘤细胞施加更强适应度效应的上下文必需基因为发现靶向治疗提供了机会。在这项研究中,我们使用crispr - cas9介导的全基因组辍学筛选来鉴定nras突变黑色素瘤的遗传依赖性。通常,黑色素瘤细胞系在环境(~ 20%)O2条件下培养,尽管O2浓度为<;8%在黑色素细胞所在的表皮真皮交界处,导致基因和蛋白质表达的适应。因此,对于我们的筛选,我们使用了一组早期传代新西兰黑色素瘤(NZM)细胞系,这些细胞系是在生理(5%)O2条件下建立和培养的。6个NRAS突变型和7个NRAS野生型(5个BRAF突变型,2个BRAF/NRAS/ nf1野生型)的NZM细胞系(补充表S1)用Brunello单导RNA (sgRNA)文库在感染的倍数约为0.3的情况下进行多次重复转导,并在5% O2下筛选长达35天(补充方法和材料)。所有的NZM系在10代以内进行转导培养。评估sgRNA文库的表达以评估可转导性,任何细胞系都表现出较差的sgRNA表达(<;80%计数≥1的sgrna被排除在进一步分析之外(补充表S2)。在13个NZM细胞系中有9个观察到中等到高代表性,而4个细胞系由于<;80%的sgrna被检测到(图1A)。sgRNA表达的减少伴随着非靶向控制(NTC) sgRNA的缺失(图1A),更大的读取计数不平等(补充图S1,补充表S2),以及与Brunello文库质粒和单个细胞系复制之间的相关性降低(补充图S2),这表明随机进化而不是敲除诱导的适应度效应。我们使用BAGEL2来估计相对于常见必要和非必要基因的参考集的基因重要性。通常,组织不可知论基因集用于此目的b[5],但我们建立了一个结合组织不可知论和黑色素瘤特异性必需基因(补充表S3)的组合必需基因集,显示出高精确召回率(补充图S3A),在NZM37细胞中常见必需基因和非必需基因的分布之间有明显的分离(图1B,补充图S3B)。用组织特异性基因补充组织不可知基因,可以拓宽共同必需基因的范围,提高BAGEL2分析的敏感性,在设计CRISPR退出筛选时,这是一个有价值的考虑因素。使用组合必需基因集的BAGEL2分析揭示了常见必需基因和非必需基因在NZM细胞系中的分布差异(补充图S4)。具有高sgRNA表达的细胞系在常见必需基因和非必需基因的分布之间表现出明显的分离(图1C),而四个被排除的细胞系和NZM74则显示出>;60%的基因集分布重叠(补充表S4)。对5个nras突变型和4个nras野生型细胞系的比较分析显示,59个候选基因在nras突变型黑色素瘤细胞系中比在nras野生型细胞系中更为重要(P <;0.01;补充表S5)。正如预期的那样,鉴于其致癌作用,NRAS是最受欢迎的,验证了我们在NRAS突变黑色素瘤中识别遗传依赖性的方法。下一个最突出的打击是SHOC2, MAPK信号的正调节因子(图1D)。为了验证我们的发现,我们使用DepMap 24Q2(补充表S1)提取的数据,在20% O2条件下,对54株全基因组Avana sgRNA文库筛选的黑色素瘤细胞系进行了为期21天的BAGEL2分析。由于DepMap采用严格的筛选质量标准,因此Avana黑色素瘤筛查显示出较高的sgRNA代表性(补充表S6),除两例外,所有参考基因集分布之间的重叠不到30%(补充图S5,补充表S7)。与NZM筛选结果一致,NRAS-突变型细胞系中比NRAS-野生型细胞系中最重要的两个基因是NRAS和SHOC2(图1E-F)。 此外,这些是唯一在两组筛选中排名前30位的基因(补充表S5)。Reactome通路分析显示,与DNA修复、RNA代谢、翻译和核糖体RNA加工相关的基因过度表达,而不是MAPK信号传导(补充图S6)。为了证实其在nras突变型黑色素瘤细胞中的遗传依赖性,我们在三个nras突变型和三个nras野生型NZM细胞系中分别敲除了SHOC2。与非必需基因敲除细胞或NTC细胞相比,在nras突变细胞系的所有复制转导中,用三种独立的sgRNA耗尽SHOC2后,观察到细胞增殖减少(图1G,补充图S7)。相反,敲除SHOC2并不影响nras -野生型细胞的增殖,其生长与非必需基因敲除和/或NTC细胞相似(图1H)。到第28天,与NTC细胞相比,每种细胞系中三种SHOC2 sgrna中至少有两种的SHOC2敲除nras突变细胞系的生长明显降低,而在nras野生型细胞系中没有观察到显著差异(补充图S8)。此外,在两个nras突变型NZM17重复中,在第28天,SHOC2敲除与ERK磷酸化降低有关,但在nras野生型NZM37细胞中则没有(图1I)。作为联合敲除,第三个NZM17重复群体在第28天恢复了部分SHOC2表达。然而,在较早的时间点,它没有检测到SHOC2表达,并且显示出ERK磷酸化的减少,类似于在28天的NZM17 R1和R2培养中观察到的,以及在使用RAF二聚体抑制剂belvarafenib处理的SHOC2野生型细胞中观察到的(补充图S9)。为了证实在生理氧条件下,SHOC2敲除的影响并不局限于NZM细胞,我们用三个SHOC2 sgrna转导sk - mel2 nras突变黑色素瘤细胞,观察到细胞增殖和ERK磷酸化的类似减少,与nras突变而非nras野生型NZM细胞系相当。此外,敲除SHOC2增加了对RAF二聚体抑制剂belvarafenib和naporafenib的敏感性(补充图S10)。尽管在nras突变型培养物中,敲除SHOC2可在28天内减少增殖,但在nras野生型培养物中却没有,我们无法确认这些影响是否能长期维持或在体内维持。虽然有报道称,在kras突变的胰腺和肺肿瘤异种移植物中,SHOC2缺失可阻止肿瘤生长[6,7],但本文并未尝试此类研究。在混合敲除培养中,由于其生长优势,表达SHOC2的细胞在体外或体内[8]中都可能出现阳性选择,这可能低估了SHOC2敲除对nras突变肿瘤生长的真正影响。这个问题可以通过克隆敲除来缓解;然而,这些克隆体的生长速度可能非常缓慢,如果有的话。SHOC2通过与MRAS和PP1C形成全磷酸酶复合物,在MAPK信号传导调控中发挥关键作用,该复合物通过抑制磷酸化位点[9]的去磷酸化激活RAF蛋白。与nras -野生型细胞[1]相反,在nras -突变细胞中特异性诱导的SHOC2的必要性可能反映了它们对构成性MAPK信号的依赖性(癌基因成瘾)。此外,突变型NRAS可能在SHOC2-RAS-PP1C复合体中替代MRAS,并且由于其组成活性,在NRAS-野生型细胞[10]中比SHOC2-MRAS-PP1C复合体更大程度上促进RAF的激活。此前已经发现,在其他ras相关癌症中,SHOC2是一种遗传依赖性[6,7],现在我们的研究表明,它也可能是nras突变型黑色素瘤的一个有希望的治疗靶点。一些NZM筛选受到sgRNA代表性差的不利影响,这限制了区分已知必需和非必需基因的能力。同一细胞系内复制文库缺乏高度一致性可能反映了早期传代NZM细胞系存在的异质性。虽然早期传代状态保留了肿瘤的异质性并增强了临床相关性,但异质性较大的细胞系在筛选期间可能更容易受到克隆进化的影响,因为不同的细胞群以不同的速度生长,导致随机克隆扩增和退出——类似于我们在体内筛选中观察到的情况[8]。生理上的氧水平可能进一步加剧了这一问题,这不仅减缓了增殖,需要更长的筛查时间,而且还降低了转导效率。尽管如此,这在功能基因组学筛选的设计中提出了一个重要的困境,即临床相关性优先级与高sgRNA代表性和可重复性。通过分析两个独立的数据集,我们的研究旨在平衡这两个优先事项。 综上所述,在生理O2条件下生长的早期传代NZM细胞系中进行的全基因组CRISPR-Cas9敲除筛选发现,在nras突变型黑色素瘤细胞中,SHOC2是一种遗传易感性,而非nras野生型黑色素瘤细胞。这一发现随后通过全基因组DepMap黑色素瘤筛查分析和单个SHOC2敲除得到了验证,这导致nras突变黑色素瘤细胞系的增殖和ERK磷酸化减少。我们的研究结果强调了SHOC2作为未满足nras突变黑色素瘤临床需求的治疗靶点的潜力。概念:Tet Woo Lee, Dean C Singleton, Francis W Hunter和Stephen MF Jamieson。数据策展:Andrea Y Gu, Tet Woo Lee, Aziza Khan, Xuenan Zhang和Stephen MF Jamieson。融资收购:Francis W Hunter和Stephen MF Jamieson。调查和方法:所有作者。资源:Andrea Y Gu, Tet Woo Lee, Aziza Khan和Francis W Hunter。可视化:Andrea Y Gu和Stephen MF Jamieson。指导:李泰宇,院长C辛格尔顿和斯蒂芬MF贾米森。原稿:Andrea Y Gu和Stephen MF Jamieson。写作-评审和编辑:所有作者。作者宣称他们没有竞争利益。这项研究由新西兰癌症协会(18.14)、新西兰癌症研究信托基金(2005-PGS)、奥克兰大学基因组学医学战略研究倡议基金和莫里斯威尔金斯分子生物发现灵活研究计划中心资助。院长C辛格尔顿和斯蒂芬MF贾米森得到了奥克兰/北地癌症协会高级奖学金的支持。不适用
Whole-genome CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screens identify SHOC2 as a genetic dependency in NRAS-mutant melanoma
Mutations in the oncogene NRAS that induce constitutive RAS-GTPase activity lead to unchecked cell proliferation and migration through downstream activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) signalling pathways [1]. These mutations occur in approximately 20% of melanomas and very rarely coexist with BRAF V600 mutations. NRAS-mutant melanoma is associated with poor survival [2] and represents an unmet clinical need, with no effective therapies available following immunotherapy failure.
Identification of contextual essential genes that exert stronger fitness effects on NRAS-mutant melanoma cells presents an opportunity for the discovery of targeted therapies. In this study, we employed CRISPR-Cas9-mediated whole-genome dropout screens to identify genetic dependencies in NRAS-mutant melanoma. Typically, melanoma cell lines are cultured under ambient (∼20%) O2 conditions, despite O2 concentrations of < 8% at the epidermal-dermal junction where melanocytes reside, resulting in adaptations in gene and protein expression [3]. Therefore, for our screens, we used a panel of early-passage New Zealand Melanoma (NZM) cell lines that were established and cultured under physiological (5%) O2 conditions [4].
Six NRAS-mutant and seven NRAS-wildtype (five BRAF-mutant, two BRAF/NRAS/NF1-wildtype) NZM cell lines (Supplementary Table S1) were transduced in multiple replicates with the Brunello single guide RNA (sgRNA) library at a multiplicity of infection of approximately 0.3 and screened at 5% O2 for up to 35 days (Supplementary Methods and Materials). All NZM lines were cultured for transduction at fewer than 10 passages from derivation. The representation of the sgRNA libraries was assessed to evaluate transducibility, with any cell lines exhibiting poor sgRNA representation (< 80% of sgRNAs detected with ≥1 count) excluded from further analyses (Supplementary Table S2). Moderate to high representation was observed in nine of the 13 NZM cell lines, whereas four cell lines were excluded due to < 80% of sgRNAs being detected (Figure 1A). Reduced sgRNA representation was accompanied by dropout of non-targeting control (NTC) sgRNAs (Figure 1A), greater read count inequality (Supplementary Figure S1, Supplementary Table S2) and reduced correlation with the Brunello library plasmids and between individual cell line replicates (Supplementary Figure S2), suggesting stochastic evolution rather than knockout-induced fitness effects.
We used BAGEL2 to estimate gene essentiality relative to reference sets of common essential and nonessential genes. Typically, tissue-agnostic gene sets are used for this purpose [5], but we established a combined essential gene set incorporating both tissue-agnostic and melanoma-specific essential genes (Supplementary Table S3) that demonstrated high precision-recall (Supplementary Figure S3A), with a distinctive separation between the distributions of common essential and nonessential genes in NZM37 cells (Figure 1B, Supplementary Figure S3B). Supplementing tissue-agnostic genes with tissue-specific genes can broaden the pool of common essential genes and enhance the sensitivity of BAGEL2 analysis, making it a valuable consideration when designing CRISPR dropout screens. BAGEL2 analysis using the combined essential gene set revealed differences in the distribution of common essential and nonessential genes across the NZM cell lines (Supplementary Figure S4). Cell lines with high sgRNA representation exhibited a distinct separation between the distributions of common essential and nonessential genes (Figure 1C), whereas the four excluded lines and NZM74 showed > 60% overlap in gene set distributions (Supplementary Table S4).
Comparative analysis between the five NRAS-mutant and four NRAS-wildtype cell lines revealed 59 candidate genes that were significantly more essential in NRAS-mutant melanoma cell lines than in NRAS-wildtype cell lines (P < 0.01; Supplementary Table S5). As expected, given its oncogenic role, NRAS was the top hit, validating our approach for identifying genetic dependencies in NRAS-mutant melanoma. The next most prominent hit was SHOC2, a positive regulator of MAPK signalling (Figure 1D).
To verify our findings, we conducted BAGEL2 analysis of 54 melanoma cell lines screened with the whole-genome Avana sgRNA library for 21 days at 20% O2, using data extracted from DepMap 24Q2 (Supplementary Table S1). Since DepMap applies stringent criteria for screen quality, the Avana melanoma screens exhibited high sgRNA representation (Supplementary Table S6), with less than 30% overlap between the reference gene set distributions in all but two cases (Supplementary Figure S5, Supplementary Table S7). Consistent with the NZM screens, the top two ranked genes that were significantly more essential in NRAS-mutant than in NRAS-wildtype cell lines were NRAS and SHOC2 (Figure 1E-F). Moreover, these were the only genes that ranked in the top 30 across both sets of screens (Supplementary Table S5). Reactome pathway analysis revealed an over-representation of genes related to DNA repair, RNA metabolism, translation, and ribosomal RNA processing, but not MAPK signalling (Supplementary Figure S6).
To confirm its genetic dependency in NRAS-mutant melanoma cells, SHOC2 was individually knocked out in three NRAS-mutant and three NRAS-wildtype NZM cell lines. Reduced cell proliferation, relative to either nonessential gene knockout cells or NTC cells, was observed following SHOC2 depletion with three separate sgRNA in all replicate transductions of the NRAS-mutant cell lines (Figure 1G, Supplementary Figure S7). In contrast, SHOC2 knockout did not impair the proliferation of NRAS-wildtype cells, which grew similarly to nonessential gene knockout and/or NTC cells (Figure 1H). By day 28, SHOC2-knockout NRAS-mutant cell lines exhibited significantly reduced growth compared to NTC cells for at least two of the three SHOC2 sgRNAs in each cell line, while no significant differences were observed in NRAS-wildtype cell lines (Supplementary Figure S8).
Additionally, SHOC2 knockout was associated with reduced ERK phosphorylation at day 28 in two NRAS-mutant NZM17 replicates but not in NRAS-wildtype NZM37 cells (Figure 1I). As pooled knockouts, the third NZM17 replicate population had regained some SHOC2 expression by day 28. However, at earlier timepoints, it showed no detectable SHOC2 expression and exhibited reductions in ERK phosphorylation similar to those observed in the 28-day NZM17 R1 and R2 cultures, as well as in SHOC2-wildtype cells treated with the RAF dimer inhibitor belvarafenib (Supplementary Figure S9). To confirm that the effect of SHOC2 knockout was not limited to NZM cells under physiological oxygen conditions, we transduced SK-MEL-2 NRAS-mutant melanoma cells with three SHOC2 sgRNAs and observed similar reductions in cell proliferation and ERK phosphorylation, comparable to those seen in NRAS-mutant but not NRAS-wildtype NZM cell lines. Additionally, SHOC2 knockout increased sensitivity to the RAF dimer inhibitors belvarafenib and naporafenib (Supplementary Figure S10).
Although SHOC2 knockout reduced proliferation over 28 days in NRAS-mutant but not NRAS-wildtype cultures, we cannot confirm whether these effects are maintained long-term or in vivo. While SHOC2 depletion has been reported to prevent tumour growth in KRAS-mutant pancreatic and lung tumour xenografts [6, 7], such studies were not attempted here. In pooled knockout cultures, positive selection of cells expressing SHOC2—due to their growth advantage—could occur either in vitro or in vivo [8], potentially underestimating the true impact of SHOC2 knockout on NRAS-mutant tumour growth. This issue could be mitigated by using clonal knockouts; however, these clones would likely have very slow growth, if any at all.
SHOC2 plays a critical role in the regulation of MAPK signalling by forming a holophosphatase complex with MRAS and PP1C, which activates RAF proteins through dephosphorylation at an inhibitory phosphorylation site [9]. The induced essentiality of SHOC2 specifically in NRAS-mutant cells likely reflects their dependence on constitutive MAPK signalling for cell survival (oncogene addiction), in contrast to NRAS-wildtype cells [1]. Additionally, mutant NRAS may substitute for MRAS in the SHOC2-RAS-PP1C complex and, due to its constitutive activity, promote activation of RAF to a greater extent than the SHOC2-MRAS-PP1C complex does in NRAS-wildtype cells [10]. SHOC2 has previously been identified as a genetic dependency in other RAS-related cancers [6, 7], and now our study suggests it could also be a promising therapeutic target for NRAS-mutant melanoma.
Some of the NZM screens were adversely affected by poor sgRNA representation, which limited the ability to distinguish known essential and nonessential genes. The lack of high concordance among replicate libraries within the same cell line likely reflects the heterogeneity present in early-passage NZM cell lines. While early-passage status preserves tumour heterogeneity and enhances clinical relevance, cell lines with greater heterogeneity may be more susceptible to clonal evolution over the screening period, as different cell populations grow at varying rates, leading to random clonal expansion and dropout —similar to what we have observed in in vivo screens [8]. This issue may have been further compounded by physiological O2 levels, which not only slowed proliferation and necessitated longer duration screens, but also reduced transduction efficiency. Nonetheless, this raises an important dilemma in the design of functional genomics screens regarding prioritisation of clinical relevance versus high sgRNA representation and reproducibility. By analysing two independent datasets, our study aimed to balance both priorities.
In summary, whole-genome CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screens in early-passage NZM cell lines grown under physiological O2 identified SHOC2 as a genetic vulnerability in NRAS-mutant but not NRAS-wildtype melanoma cells. This finding was subsequently validated through analysis of whole-genome DepMap melanoma screens, and through individual SHOC2 knockout, which resulted in reduced proliferation and ERK phosphorylation in NRAS-mutant melanoma cell lines. Our results highlight the potential of SHOC2 as a therapeutic target for the unmet clinical need of NRAS-mutant melanoma.
Conceptualisation: Tet Woo Lee, Dean C Singleton, Francis W Hunter, and Stephen MF Jamieson. Data curation: Andrea Y Gu, Tet Woo Lee, Aziza Khan, Xuenan Zhang, and Stephen MF Jamieson. Funding acquisition: Francis W Hunter and Stephen MF Jamieson. Investigation and methodology: all authors. Resources: Andrea Y Gu, Tet Woo Lee, Aziza Khan, and Francis W Hunter. Visualisation: Andrea Y Gu and Stephen MF Jamieson. Supervision: Tet Woo Lee, Dean C Singleton, and Stephen MF Jamieson. Writing–original draft: Andrea Y Gu and Stephen MF Jamieson. Writing–review and editing: all authors.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
This research was funded by the Cancer Society of New Zealand (18.14), Cancer Research Trust New Zealand (2005-PGS), University of Auckland Genomics into Medicine Strategic Research Initiatives Fund and Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery Flexible Research Programme. Dean C Singleton and Stephen MF Jamieson were supported by Senior Fellowships from the Cancer Society Auckland/Northland.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Communications is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses basic, clinical, and translational cancer research. The journal welcomes submissions concerning clinical trials, epidemiology, molecular and cellular biology, and genetics.