定量脑电图洞察100名成人ADHD患者:深入研究注意变量(TOVA)相关性和注意动力学的测试

IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Elvan Ciftci, Zeynep Betul Alp
{"title":"定量脑电图洞察100名成人ADHD患者:深入研究注意变量(TOVA)相关性和注意动力学的测试","authors":"Elvan Ciftci,&nbsp;Zeynep Betul Alp","doi":"10.1111/cns.70304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) by integrating quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) power bands with the test of variables of attention (TOVA) and self-reported psychiatric symptoms. We examined the relationship between TOVA scores, qEEG findings—particularly the theta-beta ratio—and comorbid psychiatric conditions to assess their role in refining ADHD diagnoses according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-V).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 100 participants were assessed using TOVA, qEEG, and psychological scales, including the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Maudsley Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory (MOCI), and the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ). Participants were categorized into groups based on their Attention Comparison Scores (ACS) above or below the zero threshold. Mann–Whitney <i>U</i>-tests, correlation analyses, and predictive modeling using automatic linear modeling (ALM) were conducted to evaluate group differences, age-related changes, and predictor variables for attention performance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All participants met the diagnostic criteria for ADHD. Among them, 37% exhibited anxiety, 60% depression, 26% obsessive-compulsive, and 35% mood disorder symptoms. The group with ACS above zero was significantly older (<i>p</i> = 0.034) and performed better on all Tests of Variables of Attention (TOVA) measures (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Age negatively correlated with attention scores (<i>r</i> = −0.371, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), response time variability (<i>r</i> = −0.241, <i>p</i> = 0.016), and response time (<i>r</i> = −0.311, <i>p</i> = 0.002). qEEG showed significant age-related changes in theta-to-beta and delta-to-beta ratios (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.005). TOVA and qEEG ratios, particularly beta and delta activity, predicted attention and response time variability, with adjusted <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> values between 71.5% and 87.1%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The findings highlight that attention performance in ADHD is shaped by age, neuropsychological factors, and qEEG-measured brain activity. Higher attention scores correlate with better TOVA results, particularly in response time and error rates. Age-related declines in attention align with reductions in theta-to-beta and delta-to-beta ratios. Predictive modeling underscores the value of combining TOVA and qEEG to identify key predictors like response time variability, omission errors, and specific beta and delta activity. This integration enhances the evaluation of attention deficits and brain dynamics, benefiting both clinical and research applications.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":154,"journal":{"name":"CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics","volume":"31 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cns.70304","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative EEG Insights Into A Hundred Adult ADHD Patients: A Deep Dive Into Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) Correlations and Attention Dynamics\",\"authors\":\"Elvan Ciftci,&nbsp;Zeynep Betul Alp\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cns.70304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) by integrating quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) power bands with the test of variables of attention (TOVA) and self-reported psychiatric symptoms. We examined the relationship between TOVA scores, qEEG findings—particularly the theta-beta ratio—and comorbid psychiatric conditions to assess their role in refining ADHD diagnoses according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-V).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 100 participants were assessed using TOVA, qEEG, and psychological scales, including the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Maudsley Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory (MOCI), and the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ). Participants were categorized into groups based on their Attention Comparison Scores (ACS) above or below the zero threshold. Mann–Whitney <i>U</i>-tests, correlation analyses, and predictive modeling using automatic linear modeling (ALM) were conducted to evaluate group differences, age-related changes, and predictor variables for attention performance.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>All participants met the diagnostic criteria for ADHD. Among them, 37% exhibited anxiety, 60% depression, 26% obsessive-compulsive, and 35% mood disorder symptoms. The group with ACS above zero was significantly older (<i>p</i> = 0.034) and performed better on all Tests of Variables of Attention (TOVA) measures (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Age negatively correlated with attention scores (<i>r</i> = −0.371, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), response time variability (<i>r</i> = −0.241, <i>p</i> = 0.016), and response time (<i>r</i> = −0.311, <i>p</i> = 0.002). qEEG showed significant age-related changes in theta-to-beta and delta-to-beta ratios (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.005). TOVA and qEEG ratios, particularly beta and delta activity, predicted attention and response time variability, with adjusted <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> values between 71.5% and 87.1%.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The findings highlight that attention performance in ADHD is shaped by age, neuropsychological factors, and qEEG-measured brain activity. Higher attention scores correlate with better TOVA results, particularly in response time and error rates. Age-related declines in attention align with reductions in theta-to-beta and delta-to-beta ratios. Predictive modeling underscores the value of combining TOVA and qEEG to identify key predictors like response time variability, omission errors, and specific beta and delta activity. This integration enhances the evaluation of attention deficits and brain dynamics, benefiting both clinical and research applications.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cns.70304\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cns.70304\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cns.70304","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的将定量脑电图(qEEG)功率带与注意变量(TOVA)检验和自我报告的精神症状相结合,提高对注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的诊断准确性。根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-V),我们检查了TOVA分数、qEEG结果(特别是theta-beta比率)和共病精神状况之间的关系,以评估它们在改进ADHD诊断中的作用。方法采用TOVA、qEEG和贝克焦虑量表(BAI)、贝克抑郁量表(BDI)、莫兹利强迫量表(MOCI)、心境障碍问卷(MDQ)等心理量表对100名被试进行评估。参与者根据他们的注意力比较分数(ACS)高于或低于零阈值进行分组。采用Mann-Whitney u检验、相关分析和自动线性模型(ALM)预测建模来评估组间差异、年龄相关变化和注意力表现的预测变量。结果所有参与者均符合ADHD诊断标准。其中37%表现为焦虑,60%表现为抑郁,26%表现为强迫症,35%表现为情绪障碍。ACS≥0的患者年龄明显增大(p = 0.034),且在所有注意变量检验(TOVA)指标上表现较好(p < 0.05)。年龄与注意力得分(r = - 0.371, p < 0.001)、反应时间变异性(r = - 0.241, p = 0.016)、反应时间(r = - 0.311, p = 0.002)呈负相关。qEEG显示theta-to-beta和delta-to-beta比值的显著年龄相关变化(p < 0.005)。TOVA和qEEG比值,特别是β和δ活动,预测注意力和反应时间变异性,调整后的R2值在71.5%和87.1%之间。结论ADHD患者的注意力表现受年龄、神经心理因素和定量脑电图测量的大脑活动的影响。较高的注意力得分与较好的TOVA结果相关,特别是在反应时间和错误率方面。与年龄相关的注意力下降与α -比值和α -比值的降低相一致。预测建模强调了结合TOVA和qEEG来识别关键预测因子的价值,如响应时间可变性、遗漏错误以及特定的beta和delta活动。这种整合增强了对注意力缺陷和大脑动力学的评估,有利于临床和研究应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Quantitative EEG Insights Into A Hundred Adult ADHD Patients: A Deep Dive Into Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) Correlations and Attention Dynamics

Quantitative EEG Insights Into A Hundred Adult ADHD Patients: A Deep Dive Into Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) Correlations and Attention Dynamics

Objective

This study aimed to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) by integrating quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) power bands with the test of variables of attention (TOVA) and self-reported psychiatric symptoms. We examined the relationship between TOVA scores, qEEG findings—particularly the theta-beta ratio—and comorbid psychiatric conditions to assess their role in refining ADHD diagnoses according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-V).

Method

A total of 100 participants were assessed using TOVA, qEEG, and psychological scales, including the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Maudsley Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory (MOCI), and the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ). Participants were categorized into groups based on their Attention Comparison Scores (ACS) above or below the zero threshold. Mann–Whitney U-tests, correlation analyses, and predictive modeling using automatic linear modeling (ALM) were conducted to evaluate group differences, age-related changes, and predictor variables for attention performance.

Results

All participants met the diagnostic criteria for ADHD. Among them, 37% exhibited anxiety, 60% depression, 26% obsessive-compulsive, and 35% mood disorder symptoms. The group with ACS above zero was significantly older (p = 0.034) and performed better on all Tests of Variables of Attention (TOVA) measures (p < 0.05). Age negatively correlated with attention scores (r = −0.371, p < 0.001), response time variability (r = −0.241, p = 0.016), and response time (r = −0.311, p = 0.002). qEEG showed significant age-related changes in theta-to-beta and delta-to-beta ratios (p < 0.005). TOVA and qEEG ratios, particularly beta and delta activity, predicted attention and response time variability, with adjusted R2 values between 71.5% and 87.1%.

Conclusion

The findings highlight that attention performance in ADHD is shaped by age, neuropsychological factors, and qEEG-measured brain activity. Higher attention scores correlate with better TOVA results, particularly in response time and error rates. Age-related declines in attention align with reductions in theta-to-beta and delta-to-beta ratios. Predictive modeling underscores the value of combining TOVA and qEEG to identify key predictors like response time variability, omission errors, and specific beta and delta activity. This integration enhances the evaluation of attention deficits and brain dynamics, benefiting both clinical and research applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
12.70%
发文量
240
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics provides a medium for rapid publication of original clinical, experimental, and translational research papers, timely reviews and reports of novel findings of therapeutic relevance to the central nervous system, as well as papers related to clinical pharmacology, drug development and novel methodologies for drug evaluation. The journal focuses on neurological and psychiatric diseases such as stroke, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, depression, schizophrenia, epilepsy, and drug abuse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信