2019冠状病毒病对卑尔根和伦敦应急响应能力的影响

IF 2.4 3区 管理学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Disasters Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1111/disa.12683
Jarle Eid, Ilan Kelman, Kjersti B. Valdersnes, Roar Espevik, Guttorm Brattebø, Anita L. Hansen, Laila Shahzad, Gianluca Pescaroli
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病对卑尔根和伦敦应急响应能力的影响","authors":"Jarle Eid,&nbsp;Ilan Kelman,&nbsp;Kjersti B. Valdersnes,&nbsp;Roar Espevik,&nbsp;Guttorm Brattebø,&nbsp;Anita L. Hansen,&nbsp;Laila Shahzad,&nbsp;Gianluca Pescaroli","doi":"10.1111/disa.12683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study qualitatively compares how 18 experienced emergency responders from the fire services in Bergen, Norway, and London, United Kingdom, maintained and adapted their organisation's work, routines, and leadership practices to maintain operational capacity, preparedness, and resilience during the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic from 2020-23. Semi-structured, qualitative interviews were conducted with nine experienced emergency responders in London and nine in Bergen, enquiring how the pandemic affected their work, their needs for maintaining operational preparedness going forward, and their COVID-19 experiences. Four themes emerged, related to their emotional experiences, how to maintain readiness, continuing to serve the community, and professionalism and learning. The discussion of these themes highlights the need for flexibility in planning, rather than comprehensive plans, and leadership that understands emergency responders' requirements. Drawing on the unique aspects of this study, a two-country comparison and the focus on experienced emergency responders, recommendations are offered for individual and organisational resilience, and the interface between them.</p>","PeriodicalId":48088,"journal":{"name":"Disasters","volume":"49 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 impacts on emergency responder resilience in Bergen and London\",\"authors\":\"Jarle Eid,&nbsp;Ilan Kelman,&nbsp;Kjersti B. Valdersnes,&nbsp;Roar Espevik,&nbsp;Guttorm Brattebø,&nbsp;Anita L. Hansen,&nbsp;Laila Shahzad,&nbsp;Gianluca Pescaroli\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/disa.12683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study qualitatively compares how 18 experienced emergency responders from the fire services in Bergen, Norway, and London, United Kingdom, maintained and adapted their organisation's work, routines, and leadership practices to maintain operational capacity, preparedness, and resilience during the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic from 2020-23. Semi-structured, qualitative interviews were conducted with nine experienced emergency responders in London and nine in Bergen, enquiring how the pandemic affected their work, their needs for maintaining operational preparedness going forward, and their COVID-19 experiences. Four themes emerged, related to their emotional experiences, how to maintain readiness, continuing to serve the community, and professionalism and learning. The discussion of these themes highlights the need for flexibility in planning, rather than comprehensive plans, and leadership that understands emergency responders' requirements. Drawing on the unique aspects of this study, a two-country comparison and the focus on experienced emergency responders, recommendations are offered for individual and organisational resilience, and the interface between them.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disasters\",\"volume\":\"49 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disasters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/disa.12683\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disasters","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/disa.12683","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究定性比较了来自挪威卑尔根和英国伦敦消防部门的18名经验丰富的应急响应人员如何在2020-23年COVID-19(2019冠状病毒病)大流行期间维持和调整其组织的工作、惯例和领导实践,以保持运营能力、准备和复原力。我们对伦敦的9名经验丰富的应急人员和卑尔根的9名经验丰富的应急人员进行了半结构化定性访谈,询问大流行如何影响他们的工作、他们在未来保持业务准备方面的需求以及他们的COVID-19经验。四个主题出现了,与他们的情感经历,如何保持准备,继续服务社会,专业和学习有关。对这些主题的讨论突出表明,在规划方面需要灵活性,而不是全面的计划,需要了解应急人员需求的领导。根据本研究的独特方面、两国比较和对经验丰富的应急响应人员的关注,提出了关于个人和组织弹性以及它们之间的接口的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COVID-19 impacts on emergency responder resilience in Bergen and London

This study qualitatively compares how 18 experienced emergency responders from the fire services in Bergen, Norway, and London, United Kingdom, maintained and adapted their organisation's work, routines, and leadership practices to maintain operational capacity, preparedness, and resilience during the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic from 2020-23. Semi-structured, qualitative interviews were conducted with nine experienced emergency responders in London and nine in Bergen, enquiring how the pandemic affected their work, their needs for maintaining operational preparedness going forward, and their COVID-19 experiences. Four themes emerged, related to their emotional experiences, how to maintain readiness, continuing to serve the community, and professionalism and learning. The discussion of these themes highlights the need for flexibility in planning, rather than comprehensive plans, and leadership that understands emergency responders' requirements. Drawing on the unique aspects of this study, a two-country comparison and the focus on experienced emergency responders, recommendations are offered for individual and organisational resilience, and the interface between them.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Disasters
Disasters Multiple-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Disasters is a major, peer-reviewed quarterly journal reporting on all aspects of disaster studies, policy and management. It provides a forum for academics, policymakers and practitioners to publish high-quality research and practice concerning natural catastrophes, anthropogenic disasters, complex political emergencies and protracted crises around the world. The journal promotes the interchange of ideas and experience, maintaining a balance between field reports, case study articles of general interest and academic papers. Disasters: Is the leading journal in the field of disasters, protracted crises and complex emergencies Influences disaster prevention, mitigation and response policies and practices Adopts a world-wide geographical perspective Contains a mix of academic papers and field studies Promotes the interchange of ideas between practitioners, policy-makers and academics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信