高负荷卧推时的血流限制不会增加杆速或引起非闭塞激动肌的生理变化

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY
Andrew LeMense, Abby Fleming, Samuel Gomez, John Lewis, Harrison Labanowski, Michael Fedewa, Lee Winchester
{"title":"高负荷卧推时的血流限制不会增加杆速或引起非闭塞激动肌的生理变化","authors":"Andrew LeMense,&nbsp;Abby Fleming,&nbsp;Samuel Gomez,&nbsp;John Lewis,&nbsp;Harrison Labanowski,&nbsp;Michael Fedewa,&nbsp;Lee Winchester","doi":"10.1111/cpf.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Blood blow restriction (BFR) can increase peak velocity and power during high load resistance training. However, previous research primarily utilized high occlusion pressures (i.e., greater than 80% arterial occlusion pressure (AOP)), and rarely measured the physiological response during or after the bench press stimuli. The aim of this study was to investigate the application of 50%AOP during acute high load bench press exercise on barbell power, velocity, and the physiological responses to this stimulus.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Resistance trained males (<i>n</i> = 12, 26.2 ± 6.6 yrs., 84.0 ± 10.8 kg, 176.3 ± 10.4 cm) completed a maximum strength test followed by two experimental sessions which consisted of four sets of 4 reps of the barbell bench press at 75%1RM, with or without BFR applied to both arms at 50% AOP. Significance was set to <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05. A series of two-way repeated measures ANOVAs with Bonferroni post hoc corrections tested for potential changes in bar velocity, power, blood lactate, and muscle thickness and activation of the anterior deltoid and pectoralis major.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were no main effects for the interaction terms “Condition×Set” or “Condition×Time,” nor for “Condition” for any variables (all <i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). There was a “Time” effect for blood lactate (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) with lactate increasing from pre- to postexercise, and a main effects for “Set” for mean (<i>p</i> = 0.016) and peak velocity (<i>p</i> = 0.005).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>There was no difference in the change in velocity, or physiological responses during high load bench press with or without BFR at 50%AOP. While promising, use of BFR for upper body power may require pressures &gt;50%AOP.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10504,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging","volume":"45 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blood flow restriction during high load bench press does not increase bar velocity or cause physiological changes in non-occluded agonist muscles\",\"authors\":\"Andrew LeMense,&nbsp;Abby Fleming,&nbsp;Samuel Gomez,&nbsp;John Lewis,&nbsp;Harrison Labanowski,&nbsp;Michael Fedewa,&nbsp;Lee Winchester\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cpf.70006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>Blood blow restriction (BFR) can increase peak velocity and power during high load resistance training. However, previous research primarily utilized high occlusion pressures (i.e., greater than 80% arterial occlusion pressure (AOP)), and rarely measured the physiological response during or after the bench press stimuli. The aim of this study was to investigate the application of 50%AOP during acute high load bench press exercise on barbell power, velocity, and the physiological responses to this stimulus.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Resistance trained males (<i>n</i> = 12, 26.2 ± 6.6 yrs., 84.0 ± 10.8 kg, 176.3 ± 10.4 cm) completed a maximum strength test followed by two experimental sessions which consisted of four sets of 4 reps of the barbell bench press at 75%1RM, with or without BFR applied to both arms at 50% AOP. Significance was set to <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05. A series of two-way repeated measures ANOVAs with Bonferroni post hoc corrections tested for potential changes in bar velocity, power, blood lactate, and muscle thickness and activation of the anterior deltoid and pectoralis major.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>There were no main effects for the interaction terms “Condition×Set” or “Condition×Time,” nor for “Condition” for any variables (all <i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). There was a “Time” effect for blood lactate (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) with lactate increasing from pre- to postexercise, and a main effects for “Set” for mean (<i>p</i> = 0.016) and peak velocity (<i>p</i> = 0.005).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>There was no difference in the change in velocity, or physiological responses during high load bench press with or without BFR at 50%AOP. While promising, use of BFR for upper body power may require pressures &gt;50%AOP.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging\",\"volume\":\"45 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cpf.70006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cpf.70006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:血击限制(BFR)可以在高负荷阻力训练中提高峰值速度和功率。然而,以往的研究主要是利用高闭塞压(即大于80%动脉闭塞压(AOP)),很少测量卧推刺激期间或之后的生理反应。本研究的目的是探讨50%AOP在急性高负荷卧推运动中对杠铃力量、速度和生理反应的影响。方法接受阻力训练的男性12例,年龄26.2±6.6岁。(84.0±10.8 kg, 176.3±10.4 cm)完成了最大力量测试,随后进行了两次实验,包括四组杠铃卧推,每组4次,75%1RM,双臂在50% AOP上施加或不施加BFR。显著性设为p≤0.05。采用Bonferroni事后校正的一系列双向重复测量方差分析(anova)测试了杆速、功率、血乳酸、肌肉厚度以及前三角肌和胸大肌激活的潜在变化。结果交互项“Condition×Set”或“Condition×Time”和“Condition”对任何变量均无主效应(p > 0.05)。血乳酸从运动前到运动后增加,存在“时间”效应(p < 0.001),平均(p = 0.016)和峰值速度(p = 0.005)的“集”效应主要存在。结论在50%AOP的情况下,高负荷卧推时,加BFR和不加BFR的速度变化和生理反应无显著差异。虽然很有希望,但使用BFR为上肢提供力量可能需要50%AOP的压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Blood flow restriction during high load bench press does not increase bar velocity or cause physiological changes in non-occluded agonist muscles

Purpose

Blood blow restriction (BFR) can increase peak velocity and power during high load resistance training. However, previous research primarily utilized high occlusion pressures (i.e., greater than 80% arterial occlusion pressure (AOP)), and rarely measured the physiological response during or after the bench press stimuli. The aim of this study was to investigate the application of 50%AOP during acute high load bench press exercise on barbell power, velocity, and the physiological responses to this stimulus.

Methods

Resistance trained males (n = 12, 26.2 ± 6.6 yrs., 84.0 ± 10.8 kg, 176.3 ± 10.4 cm) completed a maximum strength test followed by two experimental sessions which consisted of four sets of 4 reps of the barbell bench press at 75%1RM, with or without BFR applied to both arms at 50% AOP. Significance was set to p ≤ 0.05. A series of two-way repeated measures ANOVAs with Bonferroni post hoc corrections tested for potential changes in bar velocity, power, blood lactate, and muscle thickness and activation of the anterior deltoid and pectoralis major.

Results

There were no main effects for the interaction terms “Condition×Set” or “Condition×Time,” nor for “Condition” for any variables (all p > 0.05). There was a “Time” effect for blood lactate (p < 0.001) with lactate increasing from pre- to postexercise, and a main effects for “Set” for mean (p = 0.016) and peak velocity (p = 0.005).

Conclusion

There was no difference in the change in velocity, or physiological responses during high load bench press with or without BFR at 50%AOP. While promising, use of BFR for upper body power may require pressures >50%AOP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
62
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging publishes reports on clinical and experimental research pertinent to human physiology in health and disease. The scope of the Journal is very broad, covering all aspects of the regulatory system in the cardiovascular, renal and pulmonary systems with special emphasis on methodological aspects. The focus for the journal is, however, work that has potential clinical relevance. The Journal also features review articles on recent front-line research within these fields of interest. Covered by the major abstracting services including Current Contents and Science Citation Index, Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging plays an important role in providing effective and productive communication among clinical physiologists world-wide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信