贝塔多样性的几何方法

IF 7.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Chuliang Song, Muyang Lu, Joseph R. Bennett, Benjamin Gilbert, Marie-Josée Fortin, Andrew Gonzalez
{"title":"贝塔多样性的几何方法","authors":"Chuliang Song,&nbsp;Muyang Lu,&nbsp;Joseph R. Bennett,&nbsp;Benjamin Gilbert,&nbsp;Marie-Josée Fortin,&nbsp;Andrew Gonzalez","doi":"10.1002/ecm.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Beta diversity—the variation among community compositions in a region—is a fundamental measure of biodiversity. Most classic measures have posited that beta diversity is maximized when each community has a distinct, nonoverlapping set of species. However, this assumption overlooks the ecological significance of species interactions and non-additivity in ecological systems, where the function and behavior of species depend on other species in a community. Here, we introduce a geometric approach to measure beta diversity as the hypervolume of the geometric embedding of a metacommunity. Besides considering compositional distinctiveness as in classic metrics, this geometric measure explicitly incorporates species associations and captures the idea that adding a unique, species-rich community to a metacommunity increases beta diversity. We show that our geometric measure is closely linked to and naturally extends previous information- and variation-based measures. Additionally, we provide a unifying geometric framework for widely adopted extensions of beta diversity. Applying our geometric measures to empirical data, we address two long-standing questions in beta diversity research—the latitudinal pattern of beta diversity and the effect of sampling effort—and present novel ecological insights that were previously obscured by the limitations of classic approaches. In sum, our geometric approach offers a new and complementary perspective on beta diversity, is immediately applicable to existing data, and holds promise for advancing our understanding of the complex relationships between species composition, ecosystem functioning, and stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":11505,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Monographs","volume":"95 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A geometric approach to beta diversity\",\"authors\":\"Chuliang Song,&nbsp;Muyang Lu,&nbsp;Joseph R. Bennett,&nbsp;Benjamin Gilbert,&nbsp;Marie-Josée Fortin,&nbsp;Andrew Gonzalez\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecm.70008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Beta diversity—the variation among community compositions in a region—is a fundamental measure of biodiversity. Most classic measures have posited that beta diversity is maximized when each community has a distinct, nonoverlapping set of species. However, this assumption overlooks the ecological significance of species interactions and non-additivity in ecological systems, where the function and behavior of species depend on other species in a community. Here, we introduce a geometric approach to measure beta diversity as the hypervolume of the geometric embedding of a metacommunity. Besides considering compositional distinctiveness as in classic metrics, this geometric measure explicitly incorporates species associations and captures the idea that adding a unique, species-rich community to a metacommunity increases beta diversity. We show that our geometric measure is closely linked to and naturally extends previous information- and variation-based measures. Additionally, we provide a unifying geometric framework for widely adopted extensions of beta diversity. Applying our geometric measures to empirical data, we address two long-standing questions in beta diversity research—the latitudinal pattern of beta diversity and the effect of sampling effort—and present novel ecological insights that were previously obscured by the limitations of classic approaches. In sum, our geometric approach offers a new and complementary perspective on beta diversity, is immediately applicable to existing data, and holds promise for advancing our understanding of the complex relationships between species composition, ecosystem functioning, and stability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Monographs\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Monographs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecm.70008\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecm.70008","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Beta多样性——一个地区内群落组成的变化——是生物多样性的基本衡量标准。大多数经典的测量方法都假设,当每个群落都有一个独特的、不重叠的物种集时,β多样性是最大的。然而,这种假设忽略了生态系统中物种相互作用和非加性的生态意义,在生态系统中,物种的功能和行为依赖于群落中的其他物种。在这里,我们引入了一种几何方法来测量beta多样性作为元群落几何嵌入的超体积。除了考虑到经典度量的组成独特性外,这种几何度量明确地包含了物种关联,并抓住了在元群落中添加一个独特的、物种丰富的群落可以增加β多样性的想法。我们表明,我们的几何测量与以前基于信息和变化的测量密切相关,并自然地扩展了这些测量。此外,我们还为广泛采用的beta多样性扩展提供了统一的几何框架。将我们的几何测量方法应用于经验数据,我们解决了贝塔多样性研究中两个长期存在的问题——贝塔多样性的纬度格局和抽样努力的影响——并提出了以前被经典方法的局限性所掩盖的新颖的生态学见解。总之,我们的几何方法提供了一种新的和互补的视角,可以立即应用于现有数据,并有望促进我们对物种组成、生态系统功能和稳定性之间复杂关系的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A geometric approach to beta diversity

Beta diversity—the variation among community compositions in a region—is a fundamental measure of biodiversity. Most classic measures have posited that beta diversity is maximized when each community has a distinct, nonoverlapping set of species. However, this assumption overlooks the ecological significance of species interactions and non-additivity in ecological systems, where the function and behavior of species depend on other species in a community. Here, we introduce a geometric approach to measure beta diversity as the hypervolume of the geometric embedding of a metacommunity. Besides considering compositional distinctiveness as in classic metrics, this geometric measure explicitly incorporates species associations and captures the idea that adding a unique, species-rich community to a metacommunity increases beta diversity. We show that our geometric measure is closely linked to and naturally extends previous information- and variation-based measures. Additionally, we provide a unifying geometric framework for widely adopted extensions of beta diversity. Applying our geometric measures to empirical data, we address two long-standing questions in beta diversity research—the latitudinal pattern of beta diversity and the effect of sampling effort—and present novel ecological insights that were previously obscured by the limitations of classic approaches. In sum, our geometric approach offers a new and complementary perspective on beta diversity, is immediately applicable to existing data, and holds promise for advancing our understanding of the complex relationships between species composition, ecosystem functioning, and stability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Monographs
Ecological Monographs 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The vision for Ecological Monographs is that it should be the place for publishing integrative, synthetic papers that elaborate new directions for the field of ecology. Original Research Papers published in Ecological Monographs will continue to document complex observational, experimental, or theoretical studies that by their very integrated nature defy dissolution into shorter publications focused on a single topic or message. Reviews will be comprehensive and synthetic papers that establish new benchmarks in the field, define directions for future research, contribute to fundamental understanding of ecological principles, and derive principles for ecological management in its broadest sense (including, but not limited to: conservation, mitigation, restoration, and pro-active protection of the environment). Reviews should reflect the full development of a topic and encompass relevant natural history, observational and experimental data, analyses, models, and theory. Reviews published in Ecological Monographs should further blur the boundaries between “basic” and “applied” ecology. Concepts and Synthesis papers will conceptually advance the field of ecology. These papers are expected to go well beyond works being reviewed and include discussion of new directions, new syntheses, and resolutions of old questions. In this world of rapid scientific advancement and never-ending environmental change, there needs to be room for the thoughtful integration of scientific ideas, data, and concepts that feeds the mind and guides the development of the maturing science of ecology. Ecological Monographs provides that room, with an expansive view to a sustainable future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信