波兰公立大学学术图书馆活动中的生成人工智能

IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Grzegorz Gmiterek , Sebastian D. Kotuła
{"title":"波兰公立大学学术图书馆活动中的生成人工智能","authors":"Grzegorz Gmiterek ,&nbsp;Sebastian D. Kotuła","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The article presents the results of a study conducted, using both survey and content analysis (of the websites and fan pages) of all the libraries of the public universities in Poland to establish their use of generative artificial intelligence. The general findings showed that not all libraries were active in promoting artificial intelligence solutions. Most (57 %) of the libraries supported the inclusion of GAI in the repertoire of library tools, although only 39.3 % dealt with GAI issues. 46 % actively used them despite 50 % of the libraries creating conditions favorable for the use of GAI. Interestingly, 43 % of libraries indicated that they did not think there was a need to use GAI tools with the main reasons given including a lack of staff competencies and the appropriate regulations in the area. For those libraries using GAI or AI, 47 % of them had information about this published on their home pages and 39 % on their fan pages. The most common information found was about the promotion of AI tools, the resources available in the library, organized events (49,67 % of all information) and documents on the subject (36,77 % of the published information).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 3","pages":"Article 103043"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generative artificial intelligence in the activities of academic libraries of public universities in Poland\",\"authors\":\"Grzegorz Gmiterek ,&nbsp;Sebastian D. Kotuła\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The article presents the results of a study conducted, using both survey and content analysis (of the websites and fan pages) of all the libraries of the public universities in Poland to establish their use of generative artificial intelligence. The general findings showed that not all libraries were active in promoting artificial intelligence solutions. Most (57 %) of the libraries supported the inclusion of GAI in the repertoire of library tools, although only 39.3 % dealt with GAI issues. 46 % actively used them despite 50 % of the libraries creating conditions favorable for the use of GAI. Interestingly, 43 % of libraries indicated that they did not think there was a need to use GAI tools with the main reasons given including a lack of staff competencies and the appropriate regulations in the area. For those libraries using GAI or AI, 47 % of them had information about this published on their home pages and 39 % on their fan pages. The most common information found was about the promotion of AI tools, the resources available in the library, organized events (49,67 % of all information) and documents on the subject (36,77 % of the published information).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Academic Librarianship\",\"volume\":\"51 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 103043\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Academic Librarianship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133325000394\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133325000394","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了一项研究的结果,该研究使用波兰公立大学所有图书馆的调查和内容分析(网站和粉丝页面)来建立他们对生成人工智能的使用。总体调查结果显示,并非所有图书馆都积极推广人工智能解决方案。大多数(57%)的库支持将GAI包含在库工具中,尽管只有39.3%的库处理GAI问题。尽管50%的图书馆为GAI的使用创造了有利的条件,但仍有46%的人积极使用它们。有趣的是,43%的图书馆表示,他们认为没有必要使用GAI工具,主要原因包括缺乏员工能力和该领域的适当法规。对于那些使用GAI或AI的图书馆,47%的图书馆在其主页上发布了相关信息,39%的图书馆在其粉丝页面上发布了相关信息。最常见的信息是关于人工智能工具的推广、图书馆中可用的资源、有组织的活动(占所有信息的49.67%)和有关该主题的文件(占已发布信息的36.77%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Generative artificial intelligence in the activities of academic libraries of public universities in Poland
The article presents the results of a study conducted, using both survey and content analysis (of the websites and fan pages) of all the libraries of the public universities in Poland to establish their use of generative artificial intelligence. The general findings showed that not all libraries were active in promoting artificial intelligence solutions. Most (57 %) of the libraries supported the inclusion of GAI in the repertoire of library tools, although only 39.3 % dealt with GAI issues. 46 % actively used them despite 50 % of the libraries creating conditions favorable for the use of GAI. Interestingly, 43 % of libraries indicated that they did not think there was a need to use GAI tools with the main reasons given including a lack of staff competencies and the appropriate regulations in the area. For those libraries using GAI or AI, 47 % of them had information about this published on their home pages and 39 % on their fan pages. The most common information found was about the promotion of AI tools, the resources available in the library, organized events (49,67 % of all information) and documents on the subject (36,77 % of the published information).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Academic Librarianship
Journal of Academic Librarianship INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Academic Librarianship, an international and refereed journal, publishes articles that focus on problems and issues germane to college and university libraries. JAL provides a forum for authors to present research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance; analyze policies, practices, issues, and trends; speculate about the future of academic librarianship; present analytical bibliographic essays and philosophical treatises. JAL also brings to the attention of its readers information about hundreds of new and recently published books in library and information science, management, scholarly communication, and higher education. JAL, in addition, covers management and discipline-based software and information policy developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信