全膝关节置换术中的内收管阻滞:文献综述

Nikhil Agarwal , Robert Kay , Andrew D. Duckworth , Nicholas D. Clement , David M. Griffith
{"title":"全膝关节置换术中的内收管阻滞:文献综述","authors":"Nikhil Agarwal ,&nbsp;Robert Kay ,&nbsp;Andrew D. Duckworth ,&nbsp;Nicholas D. Clement ,&nbsp;David M. Griffith","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>An adductor canal block is commonly used to reduce pain after total knee arthroplasty. Practice varies in terms of site of injection, local anaesthetic, and adjuncts used, with poor consensus in relation to the best approach. The aim of this scoping review was to assess the evidence for efficacy and safety of adductor canal block, determine variation in the technique used, type and dose of medication, and compare the efficacy of adductor canal block with other nerve block techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Four databases were searched to identify relevant studies (Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>). A total of 285 articles were found, and data was extracted from 130 randomised controlled trials.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Adductor canal block is a safe and potentially effective peripheral nerve block for reducing postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty while preserving motor function. Of all adjuncts to adductor canal block assessed, either dexamethasone or dexmedetomidine provide additional analgesic benefit. Adductor canal block combined with peri-articular local anaesthetic injection provides the best outcomes. Continuous infusion of local anaesthetic through a catheter placed in the adductor canal provides no additional benefit over a single injection. The site of injection used for adductor canal block does not seem to affect efficacy. There was no evidence to support the superiority of any single local anaesthetic agent.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This scoping review has identified variation in the use of medications, doses, techniques, and adjuncts for adductor canal block. As such, definitive conclusions regarding the most effective practice for adductor canal block cannot be made.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100381"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adductor canal block in total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review of the literature\",\"authors\":\"Nikhil Agarwal ,&nbsp;Robert Kay ,&nbsp;Andrew D. Duckworth ,&nbsp;Nicholas D. Clement ,&nbsp;David M. Griffith\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>An adductor canal block is commonly used to reduce pain after total knee arthroplasty. Practice varies in terms of site of injection, local anaesthetic, and adjuncts used, with poor consensus in relation to the best approach. The aim of this scoping review was to assess the evidence for efficacy and safety of adductor canal block, determine variation in the technique used, type and dose of medication, and compare the efficacy of adductor canal block with other nerve block techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Four databases were searched to identify relevant studies (Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>). A total of 285 articles were found, and data was extracted from 130 randomised controlled trials.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Adductor canal block is a safe and potentially effective peripheral nerve block for reducing postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty while preserving motor function. Of all adjuncts to adductor canal block assessed, either dexamethasone or dexmedetomidine provide additional analgesic benefit. Adductor canal block combined with peri-articular local anaesthetic injection provides the best outcomes. Continuous infusion of local anaesthetic through a catheter placed in the adductor canal provides no additional benefit over a single injection. The site of injection used for adductor canal block does not seem to affect efficacy. There was no evidence to support the superiority of any single local anaesthetic agent.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This scoping review has identified variation in the use of medications, doses, techniques, and adjuncts for adductor canal block. As such, definitive conclusions regarding the most effective practice for adductor canal block cannot be made.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJA open\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100381\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJA open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277260962500005X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJA open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277260962500005X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:内收管阻滞通常用于全膝关节置换术后减轻疼痛。实践在注射部位、局部麻醉和使用的辅助手段方面各不相同,关于最佳方法的共识很少。本综述的目的是评估内收管阻滞的有效性和安全性的证据,确定所使用的技术、药物类型和剂量的变化,并比较内收管阻滞与其他神经阻滞技术的有效性。方法检索4个数据库(Medline、Embase、Cochrane和ClinicalTrials.gov)以确定相关研究。共发现285篇文章,数据提取自130个随机对照试验。结果内收管阻滞是一种安全有效的周围神经阻滞方法,可在保留运动功能的同时减少全膝关节置换术后疼痛。在评估的内收管阻滞的所有辅助药物中,地塞米松或右美托咪定均可提供额外的镇痛效果。内收管阻滞联合关节周围局部麻醉的效果最好。通过内收管内置导管持续输注局部麻醉剂,与单次注射相比没有额外的益处。内收管阻滞的注射部位似乎不影响疗效。没有证据支持任何一种局部麻醉剂的优越性。结论:本综述确定了内收管阻滞的药物、剂量、技术和辅助手段的使用差异。因此,关于内收管阻滞最有效的做法,还不能得出明确的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adductor canal block in total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review of the literature

Background

An adductor canal block is commonly used to reduce pain after total knee arthroplasty. Practice varies in terms of site of injection, local anaesthetic, and adjuncts used, with poor consensus in relation to the best approach. The aim of this scoping review was to assess the evidence for efficacy and safety of adductor canal block, determine variation in the technique used, type and dose of medication, and compare the efficacy of adductor canal block with other nerve block techniques.

Methods

Four databases were searched to identify relevant studies (Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov). A total of 285 articles were found, and data was extracted from 130 randomised controlled trials.

Results

Adductor canal block is a safe and potentially effective peripheral nerve block for reducing postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty while preserving motor function. Of all adjuncts to adductor canal block assessed, either dexamethasone or dexmedetomidine provide additional analgesic benefit. Adductor canal block combined with peri-articular local anaesthetic injection provides the best outcomes. Continuous infusion of local anaesthetic through a catheter placed in the adductor canal provides no additional benefit over a single injection. The site of injection used for adductor canal block does not seem to affect efficacy. There was no evidence to support the superiority of any single local anaesthetic agent.

Conclusion

This scoping review has identified variation in the use of medications, doses, techniques, and adjuncts for adductor canal block. As such, definitive conclusions regarding the most effective practice for adductor canal block cannot be made.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJA open
BJA open Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
83 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信