Xenia Malcher , Francis Catherine Tenorio-Rodriguez , Matthias Finkbeiner , Miguel Gonzalez-Salazar
{"title":"区域供热的脱碳:对碳足迹和关键缓解战略的系统审查","authors":"Xenia Malcher , Francis Catherine Tenorio-Rodriguez , Matthias Finkbeiner , Miguel Gonzalez-Salazar","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper provides a comprehensive analysis and comparison of the carbon footprint of decarbonization strategies for district heating. By reviewing data from 42 Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies encompassing 160 heating configurations, the study highlights a predominant focus on supply-side factors, while demand-side and regulatory strategies remain underexplored. Results show that renewable-based systems yield the lowest emissions, ranging from −0.001 to 0.0909 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e/MJ of heat, with waste heat and geothermal at the lower end and solar thermal and certain biomass categories at the higher end. Biomass emissions are highly variable, ranging from very low to levels comparable with gas boilers, while solar thermal systems without heat storage present the highest emissions among renewable options, similar to those of gas boilers. Fossil fuels-based systems exhibit the highest emissions, ranging from 0.031 to 0.371 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e/MJ. Systems combining renewable and fossil sources range between 0.0003 and 0.136 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e/MJ. Analysis of energy conversion technologies indicates that Combined Heat and Power (CHP) systems significantly reduce emissions compared to traditional boilers, with reductions ranging from 16 % for multifuel systems to 70 % for geothermal systems. Heat pumps, especially when integrated with renewable energy sources, achieve an average emissions reduction of 64 % compared to gas boilers. Low temperature district heating (4GDH and 5GDH) improves efficiency and lowers emissions by 70 % relative to existing networks (3GDH). The implementation of heat storage results in 50–60 % emission reductions in solar thermal and multifuel setups, though its impact is less pronounced with geothermal systems. Additionally, subsidies for renewable heat technologies contribute to a 2–10 % decrease in emissions, underscoring the importance of supportive policy frameworks. Notable emission reductions are observed with CHP systems and heat pumps compared to gas boilers, as well as with heat storage in solar thermal and multifuel setups. The paper reveals inconsistencies and research gaps in previous studies and suggests the need for further investigation and standardized methodologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 115602"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decarbonization of district heating: A systematic review of carbon footprint and key mitigation strategies\",\"authors\":\"Xenia Malcher , Francis Catherine Tenorio-Rodriguez , Matthias Finkbeiner , Miguel Gonzalez-Salazar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper provides a comprehensive analysis and comparison of the carbon footprint of decarbonization strategies for district heating. By reviewing data from 42 Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies encompassing 160 heating configurations, the study highlights a predominant focus on supply-side factors, while demand-side and regulatory strategies remain underexplored. Results show that renewable-based systems yield the lowest emissions, ranging from −0.001 to 0.0909 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e/MJ of heat, with waste heat and geothermal at the lower end and solar thermal and certain biomass categories at the higher end. Biomass emissions are highly variable, ranging from very low to levels comparable with gas boilers, while solar thermal systems without heat storage present the highest emissions among renewable options, similar to those of gas boilers. Fossil fuels-based systems exhibit the highest emissions, ranging from 0.031 to 0.371 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e/MJ. Systems combining renewable and fossil sources range between 0.0003 and 0.136 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e/MJ. Analysis of energy conversion technologies indicates that Combined Heat and Power (CHP) systems significantly reduce emissions compared to traditional boilers, with reductions ranging from 16 % for multifuel systems to 70 % for geothermal systems. Heat pumps, especially when integrated with renewable energy sources, achieve an average emissions reduction of 64 % compared to gas boilers. Low temperature district heating (4GDH and 5GDH) improves efficiency and lowers emissions by 70 % relative to existing networks (3GDH). The implementation of heat storage results in 50–60 % emission reductions in solar thermal and multifuel setups, though its impact is less pronounced with geothermal systems. Additionally, subsidies for renewable heat technologies contribute to a 2–10 % decrease in emissions, underscoring the importance of supportive policy frameworks. Notable emission reductions are observed with CHP systems and heat pumps compared to gas boilers, as well as with heat storage in solar thermal and multifuel setups. The paper reveals inconsistencies and research gaps in previous studies and suggests the need for further investigation and standardized methodologies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"215 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115602\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125002758\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125002758","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文对区域供热脱碳策略的碳足迹进行了全面的分析和比较。通过回顾42项生命周期评估(LCA)研究的数据,包括160种供暖配置,该研究强调了主要关注供应侧因素,而需求侧和监管策略仍未得到充分探讨。结果表明,基于可再生能源的系统产生的排放量最低,范围为- 0.001至0.0909 kg CO2e/MJ的热量,其中废热和地热能排放量较低,太阳能热和某些生物质类别排放量较高。生物质排放变化很大,从非常低到与燃气锅炉相当的水平不等,而没有储热的太阳能热系统在可再生能源选择中排放量最高,与燃气锅炉相似。化石燃料系统的排放量最高,范围为0.031至0.371 kg CO2e/MJ。结合可再生能源和化石能源的系统范围在0.0003至0.136千克二氧化碳当量/焦耳之间。对能量转换技术的分析表明,与传统锅炉相比,热电联产(CHP)系统显著减少了排放,从多燃料系统的16%到地热系统的70%不等。热泵,特别是与可再生能源相结合时,与燃气锅炉相比,平均减排64%。低温区域供热(4GDH和5GDH)提高了效率,与现有网络(3GDH)相比,减少了70%的排放。在太阳能和多燃料装置中,蓄热的实施可以减少50 - 60%的排放,尽管其对地热系统的影响不那么明显。此外,对可再生热能技术的补贴有助于减少2 - 10%的排放量,强调了支持性政策框架的重要性。与燃气锅炉相比,热电联产系统和热泵,以及太阳能热和多燃料装置中的储热,显著减少了排放。本文揭示了以往研究的不一致性和研究差距,并提出了进一步调查和标准化方法的必要性。
Decarbonization of district heating: A systematic review of carbon footprint and key mitigation strategies
This paper provides a comprehensive analysis and comparison of the carbon footprint of decarbonization strategies for district heating. By reviewing data from 42 Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies encompassing 160 heating configurations, the study highlights a predominant focus on supply-side factors, while demand-side and regulatory strategies remain underexplored. Results show that renewable-based systems yield the lowest emissions, ranging from −0.001 to 0.0909 kg CO2e/MJ of heat, with waste heat and geothermal at the lower end and solar thermal and certain biomass categories at the higher end. Biomass emissions are highly variable, ranging from very low to levels comparable with gas boilers, while solar thermal systems without heat storage present the highest emissions among renewable options, similar to those of gas boilers. Fossil fuels-based systems exhibit the highest emissions, ranging from 0.031 to 0.371 kg CO2e/MJ. Systems combining renewable and fossil sources range between 0.0003 and 0.136 kg CO2e/MJ. Analysis of energy conversion technologies indicates that Combined Heat and Power (CHP) systems significantly reduce emissions compared to traditional boilers, with reductions ranging from 16 % for multifuel systems to 70 % for geothermal systems. Heat pumps, especially when integrated with renewable energy sources, achieve an average emissions reduction of 64 % compared to gas boilers. Low temperature district heating (4GDH and 5GDH) improves efficiency and lowers emissions by 70 % relative to existing networks (3GDH). The implementation of heat storage results in 50–60 % emission reductions in solar thermal and multifuel setups, though its impact is less pronounced with geothermal systems. Additionally, subsidies for renewable heat technologies contribute to a 2–10 % decrease in emissions, underscoring the importance of supportive policy frameworks. Notable emission reductions are observed with CHP systems and heat pumps compared to gas boilers, as well as with heat storage in solar thermal and multifuel setups. The paper reveals inconsistencies and research gaps in previous studies and suggests the need for further investigation and standardized methodologies.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.