开发人工智能生成的、可解释的尿路上皮癌和肾细胞癌治疗推荐系统,以支持多学科癌症会议

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Gregor Duwe , Dominique Mercier , Verena Kauth , Kerstin Moench , Vikas Rajashekar , Markus Junker , Andreas Dengel , Axel Haferkamp , Thomas Höfner
{"title":"开发人工智能生成的、可解释的尿路上皮癌和肾细胞癌治疗推荐系统,以支持多学科癌症会议","authors":"Gregor Duwe ,&nbsp;Dominique Mercier ,&nbsp;Verena Kauth ,&nbsp;Kerstin Moench ,&nbsp;Vikas Rajashekar ,&nbsp;Markus Junker ,&nbsp;Andreas Dengel ,&nbsp;Axel Haferkamp ,&nbsp;Thomas Höfner","doi":"10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Decisions on the best available treatment in clinical oncology are based on expert opinions in multidisciplinary cancer conferences (MCC). Artificial intelligence (AI) could increase evidence-based treatment by generating additional treatment recommendations (TR). We aimed to develop such an AI system for urothelial carcinoma (UC) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Comprehensive data of patients with histologically confirmed UC and RCC who received MCC recommendations in the years 2015 – 2022 were transformed into machine readable representations. Development of a two-step process to train a classifier to mimic TR was followed by identification of superordinate and detailed categories of TR. Machine learning (CatBoost, XGBoost, Random Forest) and deep learning (TabPFN, TabNet, SoftOrdering CNN, FCN) techniques were trained. Results were measured by F1-scores for accuracy weights.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>AI training was performed with 1617 (UC) and 880 (RCC) MCC recommendations (77 and 76 patient input parameters). The AI system generated fully automated TR with excellent F1-scores for UC (e.g. ‘Surgery’ 0.81, ‘Anti-cancer drug’ 0.83, ‘Gemcitabine/Cisplatin’ 0.88) and RCC (e.g. ‘Anti-cancer drug’ 0.92 ‘Nivolumab’ 0.78, ‘Pembrolizumab/Axitinib’ 0.89). Explainability is provided by clinical features and their importance score. Finally, TR and explainability were visualized on a dashboard.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study demonstrates for the first time AI-generated, explainable TR in UC and RCC with excellent performance results as a potential support tool for high-quality, evidence-based TR in MCC. The comprehensive technical and clinical development sets global reference standards for future AI developments in MCC recommendations in clinical oncology. Next, prospective validation of the results is mandatory.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11980,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 115367"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of an artificial intelligence-generated, explainable treatment recommendation system for urothelial carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma to support multidisciplinary cancer conferences\",\"authors\":\"Gregor Duwe ,&nbsp;Dominique Mercier ,&nbsp;Verena Kauth ,&nbsp;Kerstin Moench ,&nbsp;Vikas Rajashekar ,&nbsp;Markus Junker ,&nbsp;Andreas Dengel ,&nbsp;Axel Haferkamp ,&nbsp;Thomas Höfner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Decisions on the best available treatment in clinical oncology are based on expert opinions in multidisciplinary cancer conferences (MCC). Artificial intelligence (AI) could increase evidence-based treatment by generating additional treatment recommendations (TR). We aimed to develop such an AI system for urothelial carcinoma (UC) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Comprehensive data of patients with histologically confirmed UC and RCC who received MCC recommendations in the years 2015 – 2022 were transformed into machine readable representations. Development of a two-step process to train a classifier to mimic TR was followed by identification of superordinate and detailed categories of TR. Machine learning (CatBoost, XGBoost, Random Forest) and deep learning (TabPFN, TabNet, SoftOrdering CNN, FCN) techniques were trained. Results were measured by F1-scores for accuracy weights.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>AI training was performed with 1617 (UC) and 880 (RCC) MCC recommendations (77 and 76 patient input parameters). The AI system generated fully automated TR with excellent F1-scores for UC (e.g. ‘Surgery’ 0.81, ‘Anti-cancer drug’ 0.83, ‘Gemcitabine/Cisplatin’ 0.88) and RCC (e.g. ‘Anti-cancer drug’ 0.92 ‘Nivolumab’ 0.78, ‘Pembrolizumab/Axitinib’ 0.89). Explainability is provided by clinical features and their importance score. Finally, TR and explainability were visualized on a dashboard.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study demonstrates for the first time AI-generated, explainable TR in UC and RCC with excellent performance results as a potential support tool for high-quality, evidence-based TR in MCC. The comprehensive technical and clinical development sets global reference standards for future AI developments in MCC recommendations in clinical oncology. Next, prospective validation of the results is mandatory.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":\"220 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115367\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804925001480\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804925001480","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床肿瘤最佳治疗方案的决定是基于多学科癌症会议(MCC)的专家意见。人工智能(AI)可以通过产生额外的治疗建议(TR)来增加循证治疗。我们的目标是为尿路上皮癌(UC)和肾细胞癌(RCC)开发这样一个人工智能系统。方法将2015 - 2022年接受MCC推荐的组织学证实的UC和RCC患者的综合数据转换为机器可读的表征。开发了一个两步过程来训练一个分类器来模拟TR,然后识别TR的高级和详细类别。机器学习(CatBoost, XGBoost, Random Forest)和深度学习(TabPFN, TabNet, SoftOrdering CNN, FCN)技术进行了训练。结果以准确性权重f1分衡量。结果采用1617条(UC)和880条(RCC) MCC建议(77条和76条患者输入参数)进行训练。人工智能系统生成的全自动TR在UC(例如“手术”0.81分,“抗癌药物”0.83分,“吉西他滨/顺铂”0.88分)和RCC(例如“抗癌药物”0.92分,“尼伏单抗”0.78分,“派姆单抗/阿西替尼”0.89分)方面具有优异的f1分。可解释性由临床特征及其重要性评分提供。最后,TR和可解释性在仪表板上可视化。本研究首次证明了人工智能在UC和RCC中生成的、可解释的TR具有优异的性能结果,可作为MCC中高质量、基于证据的TR的潜在支持工具。全面的技术和临床开发为临床肿瘤学中MCC建议的未来人工智能发展设定了全球参考标准。接下来,必须对结果进行前瞻性验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of an artificial intelligence-generated, explainable treatment recommendation system for urothelial carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma to support multidisciplinary cancer conferences

Background

Decisions on the best available treatment in clinical oncology are based on expert opinions in multidisciplinary cancer conferences (MCC). Artificial intelligence (AI) could increase evidence-based treatment by generating additional treatment recommendations (TR). We aimed to develop such an AI system for urothelial carcinoma (UC) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Methods

Comprehensive data of patients with histologically confirmed UC and RCC who received MCC recommendations in the years 2015 – 2022 were transformed into machine readable representations. Development of a two-step process to train a classifier to mimic TR was followed by identification of superordinate and detailed categories of TR. Machine learning (CatBoost, XGBoost, Random Forest) and deep learning (TabPFN, TabNet, SoftOrdering CNN, FCN) techniques were trained. Results were measured by F1-scores for accuracy weights.

Results

AI training was performed with 1617 (UC) and 880 (RCC) MCC recommendations (77 and 76 patient input parameters). The AI system generated fully automated TR with excellent F1-scores for UC (e.g. ‘Surgery’ 0.81, ‘Anti-cancer drug’ 0.83, ‘Gemcitabine/Cisplatin’ 0.88) and RCC (e.g. ‘Anti-cancer drug’ 0.92 ‘Nivolumab’ 0.78, ‘Pembrolizumab/Axitinib’ 0.89). Explainability is provided by clinical features and their importance score. Finally, TR and explainability were visualized on a dashboard.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates for the first time AI-generated, explainable TR in UC and RCC with excellent performance results as a potential support tool for high-quality, evidence-based TR in MCC. The comprehensive technical and clinical development sets global reference standards for future AI developments in MCC recommendations in clinical oncology. Next, prospective validation of the results is mandatory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Cancer
European Journal of Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
953
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Cancer (EJC) serves as a comprehensive platform integrating preclinical, digital, translational, and clinical research across the spectrum of cancer. From epidemiology, carcinogenesis, and biology to groundbreaking innovations in cancer treatment and patient care, the journal covers a wide array of topics. We publish original research, reviews, previews, editorial comments, and correspondence, fostering dialogue and advancement in the fight against cancer. Join us in our mission to drive progress and improve outcomes in cancer research and patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信