玉米氮肥的种类和用量是否会影响氮肥的气体损失?

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Sergio Tovar Hernández , Fernando Salvagiotti , Nuria Lewczuk , Walter Carciochi , Keren Hernandez Guijarro , Micaela Biassoni , Esteban Kehoe , Oscar Avila , Gisela Garcia , Mirta Toribio , Fernando García , Hernan Sainz Rozas , Nahuel Reussi Calvo
{"title":"玉米氮肥的种类和用量是否会影响氮肥的气体损失?","authors":"Sergio Tovar Hernández ,&nbsp;Fernando Salvagiotti ,&nbsp;Nuria Lewczuk ,&nbsp;Walter Carciochi ,&nbsp;Keren Hernandez Guijarro ,&nbsp;Micaela Biassoni ,&nbsp;Esteban Kehoe ,&nbsp;Oscar Avila ,&nbsp;Gisela Garcia ,&nbsp;Mirta Toribio ,&nbsp;Fernando García ,&nbsp;Hernan Sainz Rozas ,&nbsp;Nahuel Reussi Calvo","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nitrogen (N) management practices have the potential to reduce nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emissions and ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) volatilization while enhancing maize (<em>Zea mays</em> L.) productivity. However, the specific effect of N rate and source remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate, during the maize growing season, the effect of both N rate and source on <em>i</em>) gaseous losses through NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and <em>ii</em>) agronomic traits such as grain yield and N uptake (N<sub>upt</sub>). Four experiments were conducted in the humid temperate region of Argentina between 2020 and 2022. Treatments consisted of four N rates, between 0 and 200 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> combined with four N sources [urea, urea with urease inhibitor (U<sub>UI</sub>), urea with nitrification inhibitor (U<sub>NI</sub>), and calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN)]. We observed a significant response to N fertilization on grain yield with increases from 20 % to 64 %. However, no differences between N sources were determined. CAN presented the greatest N<sub>upt</sub>, which was up to 27 % higher than urea-based N sources. NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization was the major N loss process with urea exhibiting the highest values. U<sub>UI</sub> and CAN significantly reduced NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization in comparison to urea. CAN showed the highest N<sub>2</sub>O emissions, losing up to 1.5 % of the applied N. U<sub>NI</sub> significantly reduced N<sub>2</sub>O emissions by 50 %. Emission factors for both NH<sub>3</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O were consistently lower than the default values suggested by the IPCC guidelines. In conclusion, N sources such as U<sub>UI</sub> and U<sub>NI</sub> lead to achieve high grain yields with a low environmental impact.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"251 ","pages":"Article 106519"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are gaseous nitrogen losses affected by the fertilizer type and rate in maize?\",\"authors\":\"Sergio Tovar Hernández ,&nbsp;Fernando Salvagiotti ,&nbsp;Nuria Lewczuk ,&nbsp;Walter Carciochi ,&nbsp;Keren Hernandez Guijarro ,&nbsp;Micaela Biassoni ,&nbsp;Esteban Kehoe ,&nbsp;Oscar Avila ,&nbsp;Gisela Garcia ,&nbsp;Mirta Toribio ,&nbsp;Fernando García ,&nbsp;Hernan Sainz Rozas ,&nbsp;Nahuel Reussi Calvo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.still.2025.106519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Nitrogen (N) management practices have the potential to reduce nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emissions and ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) volatilization while enhancing maize (<em>Zea mays</em> L.) productivity. However, the specific effect of N rate and source remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate, during the maize growing season, the effect of both N rate and source on <em>i</em>) gaseous losses through NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and <em>ii</em>) agronomic traits such as grain yield and N uptake (N<sub>upt</sub>). Four experiments were conducted in the humid temperate region of Argentina between 2020 and 2022. Treatments consisted of four N rates, between 0 and 200 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> combined with four N sources [urea, urea with urease inhibitor (U<sub>UI</sub>), urea with nitrification inhibitor (U<sub>NI</sub>), and calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN)]. We observed a significant response to N fertilization on grain yield with increases from 20 % to 64 %. However, no differences between N sources were determined. CAN presented the greatest N<sub>upt</sub>, which was up to 27 % higher than urea-based N sources. NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization was the major N loss process with urea exhibiting the highest values. U<sub>UI</sub> and CAN significantly reduced NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization in comparison to urea. CAN showed the highest N<sub>2</sub>O emissions, losing up to 1.5 % of the applied N. U<sub>NI</sub> significantly reduced N<sub>2</sub>O emissions by 50 %. Emission factors for both NH<sub>3</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O were consistently lower than the default values suggested by the IPCC guidelines. In conclusion, N sources such as U<sub>UI</sub> and U<sub>NI</sub> lead to achieve high grain yields with a low environmental impact.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"volume\":\"251 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106519\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016719872500073X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016719872500073X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

氮(N)管理措施有可能减少一氧化二氮(N2O)排放和氨(NH3)挥发,同时提高玉米(Zea mays L.)的生产力。然而,氮浓度和来源的具体影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估玉米生长季氮素水平和氮源对氮素挥发和N2O排放造成的气体损失以及籽粒产量和氮素吸收(Nupt)等农艺性状的影响。2020年至2022年间,在阿根廷湿润温带地区进行了四项试验。处理包括4种氮素水平(0 ~ 200 kg N ha−1)和4种氮素源(尿素、尿素酶抑制剂(UUI)、尿素硝化抑制剂(UNI)和硝酸铵钙(CAN))。我们观察到施氮对籽粒产量的显著影响,从20% %增加到64% %。然而,氮源之间没有差异。CAN的Nupt最高,比尿素基氮源高出27% %。NH3挥发是氮素损失的主要过程,其中尿素的损失最大。与尿素相比,UUI和CAN显著减少了NH3的挥发。CAN显示出最高的N2O排放,损失了1.5 %的N. UNI显著减少了50% %的N2O排放。NH3和N2O的排放因子始终低于IPCC指南建议的默认值。综上所述,UUI和UNI等氮素源可以在低环境影响下实现粮食高产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are gaseous nitrogen losses affected by the fertilizer type and rate in maize?
Nitrogen (N) management practices have the potential to reduce nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions and ammonia (NH3) volatilization while enhancing maize (Zea mays L.) productivity. However, the specific effect of N rate and source remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate, during the maize growing season, the effect of both N rate and source on i) gaseous losses through NH3 volatilization and N2O emissions and ii) agronomic traits such as grain yield and N uptake (Nupt). Four experiments were conducted in the humid temperate region of Argentina between 2020 and 2022. Treatments consisted of four N rates, between 0 and 200 kg N ha−1 combined with four N sources [urea, urea with urease inhibitor (UUI), urea with nitrification inhibitor (UNI), and calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN)]. We observed a significant response to N fertilization on grain yield with increases from 20 % to 64 %. However, no differences between N sources were determined. CAN presented the greatest Nupt, which was up to 27 % higher than urea-based N sources. NH3 volatilization was the major N loss process with urea exhibiting the highest values. UUI and CAN significantly reduced NH3 volatilization in comparison to urea. CAN showed the highest N2O emissions, losing up to 1.5 % of the applied N. UNI significantly reduced N2O emissions by 50 %. Emission factors for both NH3 and N2O were consistently lower than the default values suggested by the IPCC guidelines. In conclusion, N sources such as UUI and UNI lead to achieve high grain yields with a low environmental impact.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信