绘制利益相关者对希腊克里特岛采用农业生态耕作做法的看法

IF 5.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Penelope Gouta , Vasilia Konstantidelli , Stuart Henderson , Irene Tzouramani
{"title":"绘制利益相关者对希腊克里特岛采用农业生态耕作做法的看法","authors":"Penelope Gouta ,&nbsp;Vasilia Konstantidelli ,&nbsp;Stuart Henderson ,&nbsp;Irene Tzouramani","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study explores stakeholder perspectives on the future adoption of agroecological farming practices in Crete over the ten-year period (2020–2030). The aim is to understand the potential effects of such practices on various environmental and socioeconomic aspects, such as ecosystem services, farmers’ work environment, and the rural labour market. Using Q methodology, 26 Q sorts were collected and analysed, resulting in the emergence of three distinct viewpoints: <em>“Interconnected ecological farms”</em>, <em>“Environment &amp; eco-system services”,</em> and <em>“Skills and labour.”</em> Each viewpoint presents distinct considerations regarding the adoption of agroecological farming, ranging from the prediction of increased cooperation among farms to the potential impacts on the rural economy and water quality. The findings emphasize the importance of tailoring agricultural advisory and training services to accommodate bottom-up diverse learning styles among farmers. Q methodology proves to be a valuable tool for understanding complex and uncertain future scenarios, offering insights into regional policy establishment to promote sustainable and ecologically friendly farming practices. Overall, this study contributes to the growing body of literature on Q methodology’s versatility in understanding stakeholder perspectives and informing policy decisions in agriculture and related fields.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"167 ","pages":"Article 104030"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping stakeholders' perceptions of agroecological farming practices adoption in Crete, Greece\",\"authors\":\"Penelope Gouta ,&nbsp;Vasilia Konstantidelli ,&nbsp;Stuart Henderson ,&nbsp;Irene Tzouramani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The study explores stakeholder perspectives on the future adoption of agroecological farming practices in Crete over the ten-year period (2020–2030). The aim is to understand the potential effects of such practices on various environmental and socioeconomic aspects, such as ecosystem services, farmers’ work environment, and the rural labour market. Using Q methodology, 26 Q sorts were collected and analysed, resulting in the emergence of three distinct viewpoints: <em>“Interconnected ecological farms”</em>, <em>“Environment &amp; eco-system services”,</em> and <em>“Skills and labour.”</em> Each viewpoint presents distinct considerations regarding the adoption of agroecological farming, ranging from the prediction of increased cooperation among farms to the potential impacts on the rural economy and water quality. The findings emphasize the importance of tailoring agricultural advisory and training services to accommodate bottom-up diverse learning styles among farmers. Q methodology proves to be a valuable tool for understanding complex and uncertain future scenarios, offering insights into regional policy establishment to promote sustainable and ecologically friendly farming practices. Overall, this study contributes to the growing body of literature on Q methodology’s versatility in understanding stakeholder perspectives and informing policy decisions in agriculture and related fields.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science & Policy\",\"volume\":\"167 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104030\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125000462\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125000462","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究探讨了利益相关者对克里特岛未来十年(2020-2030年)采用农业生态耕作做法的看法。其目的是了解这些做法对各种环境和社会经济方面的潜在影响,如生态系统服务、农民的工作环境和农村劳动力市场。使用Q方法,收集和分析了26个Q类型,从而出现了三个不同的观点:“互联生态农场”,“环境& &;生态系统服务”,以及“技能和劳动力”。每一种观点都对采用生态农业提出了不同的考虑,从预测农场之间的合作增加到对农村经济和水质的潜在影响。研究结果强调了调整农业咨询和培训服务以适应农民自下而上的多样化学习方式的重要性。Q方法被证明是理解复杂和不确定的未来情景的宝贵工具,为区域政策制定提供见解,以促进可持续和生态友好的农业实践。总体而言,本研究为Q方法在理解利益相关者观点和为农业及相关领域的政策决策提供信息方面的多功能性文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mapping stakeholders' perceptions of agroecological farming practices adoption in Crete, Greece
The study explores stakeholder perspectives on the future adoption of agroecological farming practices in Crete over the ten-year period (2020–2030). The aim is to understand the potential effects of such practices on various environmental and socioeconomic aspects, such as ecosystem services, farmers’ work environment, and the rural labour market. Using Q methodology, 26 Q sorts were collected and analysed, resulting in the emergence of three distinct viewpoints: “Interconnected ecological farms”, “Environment & eco-system services”, and “Skills and labour.” Each viewpoint presents distinct considerations regarding the adoption of agroecological farming, ranging from the prediction of increased cooperation among farms to the potential impacts on the rural economy and water quality. The findings emphasize the importance of tailoring agricultural advisory and training services to accommodate bottom-up diverse learning styles among farmers. Q methodology proves to be a valuable tool for understanding complex and uncertain future scenarios, offering insights into regional policy establishment to promote sustainable and ecologically friendly farming practices. Overall, this study contributes to the growing body of literature on Q methodology’s versatility in understanding stakeholder perspectives and informing policy decisions in agriculture and related fields.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信