动作预期在特定运动表现中的作用：颞叶遮挡范式的三水平荟萃分析和系统回顾。

IF 3.1 2区心理学 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM

Psychology of Sport and Exercise Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102839

Tao Song, Mingzhu Ye, Gesi Teng, Weikun Zhang, Antao Chen

{"title":"动作预期在特定运动表现中的作用：颞叶遮挡范式的三水平荟萃分析和系统回顾。","authors":"Tao Song, Mingzhu Ye, Gesi Teng, Weikun Zhang, Antao Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Action anticipation is crucial for athletes, enabling them to make the most accurate decisions possible under time constraints and significantly impacting sports performance. This study systematically consolidates key findings from research on action anticipation in sports using the temporal occlusion paradigm to achieve the following five objectives: (1) quantifying the magnitude of the advantage of sports experts in action anticipation; (2) examining whether this expert advantage transfers to familiar and unfamiliar sports and, if so, quantifying its magnitude; (3) testing whether methodological manipulations significantly affect the quantification of action anticipation abilities; (4) reviewing whether temporal occlusion training can improve action anticipation abilities; and (5) inferring the relationship between action anticipation scores in the laboratory and actual movement performance in sports. We identified 111 original articles from databases including Web of Science, APA PsycInfo, PubMed, and Cochrane Library for qualitative analysis. Of these, 127 effect sizes contributed by 100 studies were analyzed using a three-level meta-analysis to achieve objectives (1) to (3), and 12 studies were included in a systematic review to achieve objectives (4) to (5). Corresponding to five objectives, our data indicate that: (1) The magnitude of the advantage of sports experts in action anticipation is strong (Hedges' g = 1.15, 95 % CI [0.97, 1.33], <em>p</em> < 0.001). (2) This expert advantage neither transfers to familiar sports nor unfamiliar sports. (3) Commonly used manipulations, such as stimulus size, response mode, participant selection, and sport category, in the temporal occlusion paradigm consistently yield substantial effects. (4) Temporal occlusion training can improve action anticipation abilities. (5) A small to moderate correlation exists between action anticipation scores in the laboratory and actual movement performance in sports. These findings provide a comprehensive understanding of the crucial role of action anticipation in specific sports performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54536,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Sport and Exercise","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 102839"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of action anticipation in specific sport performance: A three-level meta-analysis and systematic review in temporal occlusion paradigm\",\"authors\":\"Tao Song, Mingzhu Ye, Gesi Teng, Weikun Zhang, Antao Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Action anticipation is crucial for athletes, enabling them to make the most accurate decisions possible under time constraints and significantly impacting sports performance. This study systematically consolidates key findings from research on action anticipation in sports using the temporal occlusion paradigm to achieve the following five objectives: (1) quantifying the magnitude of the advantage of sports experts in action anticipation; (2) examining whether this expert advantage transfers to familiar and unfamiliar sports and, if so, quantifying its magnitude; (3) testing whether methodological manipulations significantly affect the quantification of action anticipation abilities; (4) reviewing whether temporal occlusion training can improve action anticipation abilities; and (5) inferring the relationship between action anticipation scores in the laboratory and actual movement performance in sports. We identified 111 original articles from databases including Web of Science, APA PsycInfo, PubMed, and Cochrane Library for qualitative analysis. Of these, 127 effect sizes contributed by 100 studies were analyzed using a three-level meta-analysis to achieve objectives (1) to (3), and 12 studies were included in a systematic review to achieve objectives (4) to (5). Corresponding to five objectives, our data indicate that: (1) The magnitude of the advantage of sports experts in action anticipation is strong (Hedges' g = 1.15, 95 % CI [0.97, 1.33], <em>p</em> < 0.001). (2) This expert advantage neither transfers to familiar sports nor unfamiliar sports. (3) Commonly used manipulations, such as stimulus size, response mode, participant selection, and sport category, in the temporal occlusion paradigm consistently yield substantial effects. (4) Temporal occlusion training can improve action anticipation abilities. (5) A small to moderate correlation exists between action anticipation scores in the laboratory and actual movement performance in sports. These findings provide a comprehensive understanding of the crucial role of action anticipation in specific sports performance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology of Sport and Exercise\",\"volume\":\"79 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102839\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology of Sport and Exercise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S146902922500038X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Sport and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S146902922500038X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

动作预测对运动员来说是至关重要的，它使他们能够在时间限制下做出最准确的决定，并对运动成绩产生重大影响。本研究系统地整合了运动动作预期研究的主要成果，利用时间遮挡范式实现了以下五个目标：(1)量化运动专家在动作预期方面的优势程度；(2)检查这种专家优势是否会转移到熟悉和不熟悉的运动中，如果是，量化其大小；(3)检验方法操作是否显著影响动作预期能力的量化；(4)回顾颞叶遮挡训练是否能提高动作预期能力；(5)推断实验室动作预期得分与实际运动动作表现的关系。我们从Web of Science、APA PsycInfo、PubMed和Cochrane Library等数据库中选取了111篇原创文章进行定性分析。其中，为实现目标(1)至(3)，对100项研究贡献的127个效应量进行了三水平荟萃分析，并将12项研究纳入系统综述，以实现目标(4)至(5)。对应于五个目标，我们的数据表明：(1)运动专家在动作预期方面的优势程度很强（Hedges' g = 1.15, 95% CI [0.97, 1.33], p < 0.001）。这种专家优势既不会转移到熟悉的运动项目上，也不会转移到不熟悉的运动项目上。(3)颞叶遮挡范式中常用的刺激大小、反应方式、参与者选择、运动类别等操作均具有显著的效果。(4)颞叶遮挡训练可以提高动作预期能力。(5)实验中动作预期得分与运动中实际动作表现存在小到中等的相关关系。这些发现为动作预期在特定运动表现中的关键作用提供了全面的理解。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The role of action anticipation in specific sport performance: A three-level meta-analysis and systematic review in temporal occlusion paradigm

Action anticipation is crucial for athletes, enabling them to make the most accurate decisions possible under time constraints and significantly impacting sports performance. This study systematically consolidates key findings from research on action anticipation in sports using the temporal occlusion paradigm to achieve the following five objectives: (1) quantifying the magnitude of the advantage of sports experts in action anticipation; (2) examining whether this expert advantage transfers to familiar and unfamiliar sports and, if so, quantifying its magnitude; (3) testing whether methodological manipulations significantly affect the quantification of action anticipation abilities; (4) reviewing whether temporal occlusion training can improve action anticipation abilities; and (5) inferring the relationship between action anticipation scores in the laboratory and actual movement performance in sports. We identified 111 original articles from databases including Web of Science, APA PsycInfo, PubMed, and Cochrane Library for qualitative analysis. Of these, 127 effect sizes contributed by 100 studies were analyzed using a three-level meta-analysis to achieve objectives (1) to (3), and 12 studies were included in a systematic review to achieve objectives (4) to (5). Corresponding to five objectives, our data indicate that: (1) The magnitude of the advantage of sports experts in action anticipation is strong (Hedges' g = 1.15, 95 % CI [0.97, 1.33], p < 0.001). (2) This expert advantage neither transfers to familiar sports nor unfamiliar sports. (3) Commonly used manipulations, such as stimulus size, response mode, participant selection, and sport category, in the temporal occlusion paradigm consistently yield substantial effects. (4) Temporal occlusion training can improve action anticipation abilities. (5) A small to moderate correlation exists between action anticipation scores in the laboratory and actual movement performance in sports. These findings provide a comprehensive understanding of the crucial role of action anticipation in specific sports performance.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Psychology of Sport and Exercise 医学-心理学

CiteScore

6.40

自引率

5.90%

发文量

172

审稿时长

69 days

期刊介绍： Psychology of Sport and Exercise is an international forum for scholarly reports in the psychology of sport and exercise, broadly defined. The journal is open to the use of diverse methodological approaches. Manuscripts that will be considered for publication will present results from high quality empirical research, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, commentaries concerning already published PSE papers or topics of general interest for PSE readers, protocol papers for trials, and reports of professional practice (which will need to demonstrate academic rigour and go beyond mere description). The CONSORT guidelines consort-statement need to be followed for protocol papers for trials; authors should present a flow diagramme and attach with their cover letter the CONSORT checklist. For meta-analysis, the PRISMA prisma-statement guidelines should be followed; authors should present a flow diagramme and attach with their cover letter the PRISMA checklist. For systematic reviews it is recommended that the PRISMA guidelines are followed, although it is not compulsory. Authors interested in submitting replications of published studies need to contact the Editors-in-Chief before they start their replication. We are not interested in manuscripts that aim to test the psychometric properties of an existing scale from English to another language, unless new validation methods are used which address previously unanswered research questions.