一期与两期双侧全膝关节置换术:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Alessandro Bensa, Marco Delcogliano, Giacomo Moraca, Luca Bianco Prevot, Gae Fattini Fellini, Giuseppe Filardo
{"title":"一期与两期双侧全膝关节置换术:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Alessandro Bensa, Marco Delcogliano, Giacomo Moraca, Luca Bianco Prevot, Gae Fattini Fellini, Giuseppe Filardo","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bilateral total knee arthroplasty (B-TKA) represents an increasingly used option to address advanced bilateral knee osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of this study was to quantify and compare one-stage and two-stage B-TKA results in terms of clinical outcomes, perioperative parameters, complication, revision, and mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The literature search was conducted using three databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science) in February 2024 according to the guidelines for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Inclusion criteria were: comparative studies, English language, no time filter, on the comparison of one-stage and two-stage B-TKA for bilateral knee OA treatment. The quality of each article was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions tool (ROBINS-I).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 2,130 articles retrieved, 69 studies (366,722 patients) were included. One-stage B-TKA showed lower rates of TKA-related complications (P = 0.043), deep infections (P < 0.001), wound complications (P = 0.033), operative time (P = 0.028), length of hospital stay (P < 0.001), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score (P = 0.013), and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) score (P = 0.004), but higher mortality rates at the 1-month (P < 0.001), 3-month (P < 0.001), and 1-year (P = 0.001) follow-ups, as well as higher rates of neurological (P = 0.013) and gastrointestinal (P < 0.001) complications, deep vein thrombosis (P = 0.016), and pulmonary embolism (P < 0.001). The risk of bias was \"low\" in 26 studies, \"moderate\" in 36 studies, \"serious\" in six studies, and \"critical\" in one study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>One-stage B-TKA was associated with a higher mortality rate and thromboembolic risk while presenting lower TKA-related and infective complications compared to two-stage B-TKA. One-stage B-TKA also reduced hospital stay and total surgical time but provided only marginal improvement in clinical outcomes compared to two-stage B-TKA while showing higher risk of neurologic and gastrointestinal complications. These results offer important information for both patients and surgeons in evaluating the most appropriate surgical approach, thereby contributing to optimize the management of patients undergoing B-TKA.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One-Stage versus Two-Stage Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Bensa, Marco Delcogliano, Giacomo Moraca, Luca Bianco Prevot, Gae Fattini Fellini, Giuseppe Filardo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bilateral total knee arthroplasty (B-TKA) represents an increasingly used option to address advanced bilateral knee osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of this study was to quantify and compare one-stage and two-stage B-TKA results in terms of clinical outcomes, perioperative parameters, complication, revision, and mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The literature search was conducted using three databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science) in February 2024 according to the guidelines for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Inclusion criteria were: comparative studies, English language, no time filter, on the comparison of one-stage and two-stage B-TKA for bilateral knee OA treatment. The quality of each article was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions tool (ROBINS-I).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 2,130 articles retrieved, 69 studies (366,722 patients) were included. One-stage B-TKA showed lower rates of TKA-related complications (P = 0.043), deep infections (P < 0.001), wound complications (P = 0.033), operative time (P = 0.028), length of hospital stay (P < 0.001), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score (P = 0.013), and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) score (P = 0.004), but higher mortality rates at the 1-month (P < 0.001), 3-month (P < 0.001), and 1-year (P = 0.001) follow-ups, as well as higher rates of neurological (P = 0.013) and gastrointestinal (P < 0.001) complications, deep vein thrombosis (P = 0.016), and pulmonary embolism (P < 0.001). The risk of bias was \\\"low\\\" in 26 studies, \\\"moderate\\\" in 36 studies, \\\"serious\\\" in six studies, and \\\"critical\\\" in one study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>One-stage B-TKA was associated with a higher mortality rate and thromboembolic risk while presenting lower TKA-related and infective complications compared to two-stage B-TKA. One-stage B-TKA also reduced hospital stay and total surgical time but provided only marginal improvement in clinical outcomes compared to two-stage B-TKA while showing higher risk of neurologic and gastrointestinal complications. These results offer important information for both patients and surgeons in evaluating the most appropriate surgical approach, thereby contributing to optimize the management of patients undergoing B-TKA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.026\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

双侧全膝关节置换术(B-TKA)越来越多地被用于治疗晚期双侧膝骨关节炎(OA)。本研究的目的是量化和比较一期和二期B-TKA的临床结果、围手术期参数、并发症、翻修和死亡率。方法:根据PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis)指南,于2024年2月使用PubMed、Cochrane、Web of Science三个数据库进行文献检索。纳入标准为:一期与二期B-TKA治疗双侧膝关节OA的比较研究、英文、无时间筛选。每篇文章的质量采用Cochrane非随机研究干预工具(ROBINS-I)的偏倚风险评估。结果:在检索到的2130篇文章中,包括69项研究(366722例患者)。一期B-TKA术后tka相关并发症(P = 0.043)、深部感染(P < 0.001)、伤口并发症(P = 0.033)、手术时间(P = 0.028)、住院时间(P < 0.001)、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分(P = 0.013)和牛津膝关节评分(OKS)评分(P = 0.004)的发生率较低,但随访1个月(P < 0.001)、3个月(P < 0.001)和1年(P = 0.001)的死亡率较高。神经系统(P = 0.013)和胃肠道(P < 0.001)并发症、深静脉血栓形成(P = 0.016)和肺栓塞(P < 0.001)发生率较高。26项研究的偏倚风险为“低”,36项研究为“中等”,6项研究为“严重”,1项研究为“严重”。结论:与两期B-TKA相比,一期B-TKA与更高的死亡率和血栓栓塞风险相关,但tka相关并发症和感染并发症较低。一期B-TKA也减少了住院时间和总手术时间,但与两期B-TKA相比,临床结果只有边际改善,同时显示出更高的神经和胃肠道并发症风险。这些结果为患者和外科医生评估最合适的手术入路提供了重要的信息,从而有助于优化B-TKA患者的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
One-Stage versus Two-Stage Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Introduction: Bilateral total knee arthroplasty (B-TKA) represents an increasingly used option to address advanced bilateral knee osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of this study was to quantify and compare one-stage and two-stage B-TKA results in terms of clinical outcomes, perioperative parameters, complication, revision, and mortality rates.

Methods: The literature search was conducted using three databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science) in February 2024 according to the guidelines for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Inclusion criteria were: comparative studies, English language, no time filter, on the comparison of one-stage and two-stage B-TKA for bilateral knee OA treatment. The quality of each article was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions tool (ROBINS-I).

Results: Among the 2,130 articles retrieved, 69 studies (366,722 patients) were included. One-stage B-TKA showed lower rates of TKA-related complications (P = 0.043), deep infections (P < 0.001), wound complications (P = 0.033), operative time (P = 0.028), length of hospital stay (P < 0.001), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score (P = 0.013), and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) score (P = 0.004), but higher mortality rates at the 1-month (P < 0.001), 3-month (P < 0.001), and 1-year (P = 0.001) follow-ups, as well as higher rates of neurological (P = 0.013) and gastrointestinal (P < 0.001) complications, deep vein thrombosis (P = 0.016), and pulmonary embolism (P < 0.001). The risk of bias was "low" in 26 studies, "moderate" in 36 studies, "serious" in six studies, and "critical" in one study.

Conclusion: One-stage B-TKA was associated with a higher mortality rate and thromboembolic risk while presenting lower TKA-related and infective complications compared to two-stage B-TKA. One-stage B-TKA also reduced hospital stay and total surgical time but provided only marginal improvement in clinical outcomes compared to two-stage B-TKA while showing higher risk of neurologic and gastrointestinal complications. These results offer important information for both patients and surgeons in evaluating the most appropriate surgical approach, thereby contributing to optimize the management of patients undergoing B-TKA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信