颈部切除术与接受辅助免疫疗法的头颈癌患者的生存率

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Aman M. Patel, Afash Haleem, Paul T. Cowan, Dylan F. Roden
{"title":"颈部切除术与接受辅助免疫疗法的头颈癌患者的生存率","authors":"Aman M. Patel,&nbsp;Afash Haleem,&nbsp;Paul T. Cowan,&nbsp;Dylan F. Roden","doi":"10.1002/lio2.70120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Some studies suggest that neck dissection (ND) should be avoided in candidates for immunotherapy because lymph nodes are primary sites for immunotherapy activation. Our study investigates ND utilization and associated differences in overall survival (OS) among patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing adjuvant immunotherapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The 2013–2018 National Cancer Database was retrospectively reviewed for patients with HNC undergoing surgery with curative intent, and adjuvant immunotherapy. Multivariable binary logistic and Cox regression models adjusted for patient demographics, clinicopathologic features, and treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 1335 patients satisfying inclusion criteria, 679 (50.9%) patients underwent ND: 94 (13.8%) had pN0, 109 (16.1%) had pN1, 411 (60.5%) had pN2, 60 (8.8%) had pN3, and 5 (0.7%) had pNx classification. On multivariable binary logistic regression, academic treatment facility, cT4, and cN1–3 classification were associated with higher odds of undergoing ND (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05); salivary, sinonasal, oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, and laryngeal primary sites were associated with decreased odds (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Compared with those undergoing neck observation, patients undergoing ND had worse OS (49.4% vs. 61.5%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) on Kaplan–Meier but not multivariable Cox (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82–1.24, <i>p</i> = 0.968) regression. Compared with adjuvant immunotherapy alone, the addition of radiotherapy (aHR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44–0.93) and chemoradiotherapy (aHR 0.56, 95% CI 0.37–0.86) were associated with higher OS (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.025).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>ND was utilized in approximately 51% of patients with HNC undergoing adjuvant immunotherapy. ND was not associated with worse OS, possibly related to the high rate of pN1–3 classification.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>4</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.70120","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neck Dissection and Survival Among Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Adjuvant Immunotherapy\",\"authors\":\"Aman M. Patel,&nbsp;Afash Haleem,&nbsp;Paul T. Cowan,&nbsp;Dylan F. Roden\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lio2.70120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Some studies suggest that neck dissection (ND) should be avoided in candidates for immunotherapy because lymph nodes are primary sites for immunotherapy activation. Our study investigates ND utilization and associated differences in overall survival (OS) among patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing adjuvant immunotherapy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The 2013–2018 National Cancer Database was retrospectively reviewed for patients with HNC undergoing surgery with curative intent, and adjuvant immunotherapy. Multivariable binary logistic and Cox regression models adjusted for patient demographics, clinicopathologic features, and treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of 1335 patients satisfying inclusion criteria, 679 (50.9%) patients underwent ND: 94 (13.8%) had pN0, 109 (16.1%) had pN1, 411 (60.5%) had pN2, 60 (8.8%) had pN3, and 5 (0.7%) had pNx classification. On multivariable binary logistic regression, academic treatment facility, cT4, and cN1–3 classification were associated with higher odds of undergoing ND (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05); salivary, sinonasal, oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, and laryngeal primary sites were associated with decreased odds (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Compared with those undergoing neck observation, patients undergoing ND had worse OS (49.4% vs. 61.5%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) on Kaplan–Meier but not multivariable Cox (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82–1.24, <i>p</i> = 0.968) regression. Compared with adjuvant immunotherapy alone, the addition of radiotherapy (aHR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44–0.93) and chemoradiotherapy (aHR 0.56, 95% CI 0.37–0.86) were associated with higher OS (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.025).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>ND was utilized in approximately 51% of patients with HNC undergoing adjuvant immunotherapy. ND was not associated with worse OS, possibly related to the high rate of pN1–3 classification.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\\n \\n <p>4</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.70120\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70120\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70120","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Neck Dissection and Survival Among Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Adjuvant Immunotherapy

Neck Dissection and Survival Among Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Adjuvant Immunotherapy

Background

Some studies suggest that neck dissection (ND) should be avoided in candidates for immunotherapy because lymph nodes are primary sites for immunotherapy activation. Our study investigates ND utilization and associated differences in overall survival (OS) among patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing adjuvant immunotherapy.

Methods

The 2013–2018 National Cancer Database was retrospectively reviewed for patients with HNC undergoing surgery with curative intent, and adjuvant immunotherapy. Multivariable binary logistic and Cox regression models adjusted for patient demographics, clinicopathologic features, and treatment.

Results

Of 1335 patients satisfying inclusion criteria, 679 (50.9%) patients underwent ND: 94 (13.8%) had pN0, 109 (16.1%) had pN1, 411 (60.5%) had pN2, 60 (8.8%) had pN3, and 5 (0.7%) had pNx classification. On multivariable binary logistic regression, academic treatment facility, cT4, and cN1–3 classification were associated with higher odds of undergoing ND (p < 0.05); salivary, sinonasal, oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, and laryngeal primary sites were associated with decreased odds (p < 0.05). Compared with those undergoing neck observation, patients undergoing ND had worse OS (49.4% vs. 61.5%, p < 0.001) on Kaplan–Meier but not multivariable Cox (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82–1.24, p = 0.968) regression. Compared with adjuvant immunotherapy alone, the addition of radiotherapy (aHR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44–0.93) and chemoradiotherapy (aHR 0.56, 95% CI 0.37–0.86) were associated with higher OS (p < 0.025).

Conclusion

ND was utilized in approximately 51% of patients with HNC undergoing adjuvant immunotherapy. ND was not associated with worse OS, possibly related to the high rate of pN1–3 classification.

Level of Evidence

4

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信