子宫内膜异位症COMPASS模型的发展:一个包含机构、系统因素和意义制定的疼痛综合模型

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Brydee Pickup, Louise Sharpe, Jemma Todd
{"title":"子宫内膜异位症COMPASS模型的发展:一个包含机构、系统因素和意义制定的疼痛综合模型","authors":"Brydee Pickup,&nbsp;Louise Sharpe,&nbsp;Jemma Todd","doi":"10.1111/bjhp.12794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Endometriosis is a chronic and progressive condition commonly associated with debilitating pain. Treatments for endometriosis pain are limited and usually invasive. Psychological interventions are a non-invasive intervention option and have proven benefits in chronic pain. Yet, psychological interventions for endometriosis pain are scant and of limited efficacy, which may be due to gaps in our understanding of endometriosis pain experiences. We sought to expand current understandings of endometriosis pain by investigating the factors that exacerbate and alleviate pain-related impact and distress, despite similar levels of pain severity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A mixed-methods approach was used, comprising quantitative pain data, qualitative interviews, and qualitative analysis of open-ended survey responses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 873 participants answered an online survey including pain outcomes. Sixteen participants were then purposively sampled for interview, in an iterative manner, in line with grounded theory until theoretical saturation was reached. Analysis of interview data resulted in a novel model of endometriosis pain. The model was cross-validated and refined using content analysis of 841 open-ended online survey responses regarding wider system priorities for endometriosis care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our COMPASS model suggested that experiences of endometriosis-related pain and associated distress and impact were shaped by a dynamic interaction between the challenges of the gendered nature of pain, invalidation, distrust in the healthcare system, agency, sense-making, and burden. These experiences were situated within broader systemic factors of difficulty accessing care, the limitations of available treatments, and a lack of financial support.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings present a novel model of endometriosis pain. This model provides several psychosocial treatment targets that could inform future psychological and multidisciplinary interventions for endometriosis pain. Empirical validation of the model is an avenue for future research.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48161,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Health Psychology","volume":"30 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjhp.12794","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of the COMPASS model of endometriosis: A COmprehensive model of pain encompassing agency, systemic factors and sense making\",\"authors\":\"Brydee Pickup,&nbsp;Louise Sharpe,&nbsp;Jemma Todd\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjhp.12794\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Endometriosis is a chronic and progressive condition commonly associated with debilitating pain. Treatments for endometriosis pain are limited and usually invasive. Psychological interventions are a non-invasive intervention option and have proven benefits in chronic pain. Yet, psychological interventions for endometriosis pain are scant and of limited efficacy, which may be due to gaps in our understanding of endometriosis pain experiences. We sought to expand current understandings of endometriosis pain by investigating the factors that exacerbate and alleviate pain-related impact and distress, despite similar levels of pain severity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>A mixed-methods approach was used, comprising quantitative pain data, qualitative interviews, and qualitative analysis of open-ended survey responses.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 873 participants answered an online survey including pain outcomes. Sixteen participants were then purposively sampled for interview, in an iterative manner, in line with grounded theory until theoretical saturation was reached. Analysis of interview data resulted in a novel model of endometriosis pain. The model was cross-validated and refined using content analysis of 841 open-ended online survey responses regarding wider system priorities for endometriosis care.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our COMPASS model suggested that experiences of endometriosis-related pain and associated distress and impact were shaped by a dynamic interaction between the challenges of the gendered nature of pain, invalidation, distrust in the healthcare system, agency, sense-making, and burden. These experiences were situated within broader systemic factors of difficulty accessing care, the limitations of available treatments, and a lack of financial support.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our findings present a novel model of endometriosis pain. This model provides several psychosocial treatment targets that could inform future psychological and multidisciplinary interventions for endometriosis pain. Empirical validation of the model is an avenue for future research.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Health Psychology\",\"volume\":\"30 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjhp.12794\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Health Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.12794\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.12794","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的子宫内膜异位症是一种慢性进行性疾病,通常伴有衰弱性疼痛。治疗子宫内膜异位症疼痛是有限的,通常是侵入性的。心理干预是一种非侵入性干预选择,已被证明对慢性疼痛有益。然而,对子宫内膜异位症疼痛的心理干预很少,而且效果有限,这可能是由于我们对子宫内膜异位症疼痛经历的理解存在差距。我们试图通过研究加剧和减轻疼痛相关影响和痛苦的因素来扩大目前对子宫内膜异位症疼痛的理解,尽管疼痛严重程度相似。设计采用混合方法,包括定量疼痛数据、定性访谈和开放式调查回答的定性分析。方法共873名参与者参与了一项包括疼痛结果的在线调查。然后有目的地抽取16名参与者进行访谈,以迭代的方式,符合接地理论,直到达到理论饱和。对访谈数据的分析产生了一种新的子宫内膜异位症疼痛模型。通过对841份关于子宫内膜异位症护理更广泛的系统优先级的开放式在线调查回应的内容分析,该模型得到了交叉验证和改进。结果我们的COMPASS模型表明,子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛的经历以及相关的痛苦和影响是由疼痛的性别性质、无效、医疗保健系统的不信任、代理、意义制定和负担之间的动态相互作用形成的。这些经历属于更广泛的系统性因素,包括难以获得护理、可用治疗的局限性和缺乏财政支持。结论我们的发现提出了一种新的子宫内膜异位症疼痛模型。该模型提供了几个心理治疗靶点,可以为未来子宫内膜异位症疼痛的心理和多学科干预提供信息。对模型的实证验证是未来研究的一个途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Development of the COMPASS model of endometriosis: A COmprehensive model of pain encompassing agency, systemic factors and sense making

Development of the COMPASS model of endometriosis: A COmprehensive model of pain encompassing agency, systemic factors and sense making

Objectives

Endometriosis is a chronic and progressive condition commonly associated with debilitating pain. Treatments for endometriosis pain are limited and usually invasive. Psychological interventions are a non-invasive intervention option and have proven benefits in chronic pain. Yet, psychological interventions for endometriosis pain are scant and of limited efficacy, which may be due to gaps in our understanding of endometriosis pain experiences. We sought to expand current understandings of endometriosis pain by investigating the factors that exacerbate and alleviate pain-related impact and distress, despite similar levels of pain severity.

Design

A mixed-methods approach was used, comprising quantitative pain data, qualitative interviews, and qualitative analysis of open-ended survey responses.

Methods

A total of 873 participants answered an online survey including pain outcomes. Sixteen participants were then purposively sampled for interview, in an iterative manner, in line with grounded theory until theoretical saturation was reached. Analysis of interview data resulted in a novel model of endometriosis pain. The model was cross-validated and refined using content analysis of 841 open-ended online survey responses regarding wider system priorities for endometriosis care.

Results

Our COMPASS model suggested that experiences of endometriosis-related pain and associated distress and impact were shaped by a dynamic interaction between the challenges of the gendered nature of pain, invalidation, distrust in the healthcare system, agency, sense-making, and burden. These experiences were situated within broader systemic factors of difficulty accessing care, the limitations of available treatments, and a lack of financial support.

Conclusions

Our findings present a novel model of endometriosis pain. This model provides several psychosocial treatment targets that could inform future psychological and multidisciplinary interventions for endometriosis pain. Empirical validation of the model is an avenue for future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Health Psychology
British Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
1.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The focus of the British Journal of Health Psychology is to publish original research on various aspects of psychology that are related to health, health-related behavior, and illness throughout a person's life. The journal specifically seeks articles that are based on health psychology theory or discuss theoretical matters within the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信