指导回路:一种创新的快速约会方法来支持言语和语言治疗中的职业意识

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1111/tct.70077
Claudia Kate Au-Yeung, Yi-Ting Chia, Andrea Fernando, Serena Lo
{"title":"指导回路:一种创新的快速约会方法来支持言语和语言治疗中的职业意识","authors":"Claudia Kate Au-Yeung,&nbsp;Yi-Ting Chia,&nbsp;Andrea Fernando,&nbsp;Serena Lo","doi":"10.1111/tct.70077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Traditional placements in speech and language therapy (SLT) courses pose challenges for students to gain exposure and exchange knowledge within a wide range of specialties in the profession. To counteract this, we piloted an innovative ‘mentoring circuit’ to provide an online opportunity for student and newly qualified SLTs to gain insights and network.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Approach</h3>\n \n <p>Mentees and mentors were recruited through professional networks and snowball sampling methods. Six working SLTs from different specialties volunteered as ‘mentors’ and were allocated individual breakout rooms on Zoom. Students, ‘mentees’, were grouped according to SLT stages, were given the opportunity to ask questions to each specialist in 10-min intervals. Each group of mentees were rotated along the circuit until they met all six specialists. Feedback was obtained via an online questionnaire.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Evaluation</h3>\n \n <p>Fifteen mentees (67% students, 33% newly qualified SLTs) attended. Key themes emerged from mentees' feedback, including the value of learning from a diverse range of specialists, benefits of peer learning and optimal mentees–mentor ratio. Suggestions included additional time for follow-up questions. Mentors also reported positive experiences, expressing enjoyment in sharing knowledge, networking opportunities, opportunities to reflect and appreciation for the circuit's format. They suggested additional time per breakout room and receiving questions in advance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Feedback showed that the mentoring circuit effectively provided insights and facilitated the sharing of clinical practices among participants. Both mentees and mentors reported positive experiences, indicating a mutually beneficial mentoring relationship. This approach can be considered by other healthcare professions to support clinical placement learning during the students' degree.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tct.70077","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Mentoring Circuit: An Innovative Speed-Dating Approach to Support Career Awareness in Speech and Language Therapy\",\"authors\":\"Claudia Kate Au-Yeung,&nbsp;Yi-Ting Chia,&nbsp;Andrea Fernando,&nbsp;Serena Lo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tct.70077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Traditional placements in speech and language therapy (SLT) courses pose challenges for students to gain exposure and exchange knowledge within a wide range of specialties in the profession. To counteract this, we piloted an innovative ‘mentoring circuit’ to provide an online opportunity for student and newly qualified SLTs to gain insights and network.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Approach</h3>\\n \\n <p>Mentees and mentors were recruited through professional networks and snowball sampling methods. Six working SLTs from different specialties volunteered as ‘mentors’ and were allocated individual breakout rooms on Zoom. Students, ‘mentees’, were grouped according to SLT stages, were given the opportunity to ask questions to each specialist in 10-min intervals. Each group of mentees were rotated along the circuit until they met all six specialists. Feedback was obtained via an online questionnaire.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Evaluation</h3>\\n \\n <p>Fifteen mentees (67% students, 33% newly qualified SLTs) attended. Key themes emerged from mentees' feedback, including the value of learning from a diverse range of specialists, benefits of peer learning and optimal mentees–mentor ratio. Suggestions included additional time for follow-up questions. Mentors also reported positive experiences, expressing enjoyment in sharing knowledge, networking opportunities, opportunities to reflect and appreciation for the circuit's format. They suggested additional time per breakout room and receiving questions in advance.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Implications</h3>\\n \\n <p>Feedback showed that the mentoring circuit effectively provided insights and facilitated the sharing of clinical practices among participants. Both mentees and mentors reported positive experiences, indicating a mutually beneficial mentoring relationship. This approach can be considered by other healthcare professions to support clinical placement learning during the students' degree.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Teacher\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tct.70077\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

语言治疗(SLT)课程的传统安排对学生在广泛的专业领域内获得接触和交流知识构成挑战。为了解决这个问题,我们试点了一个创新的“指导回路”,为学生和新合格的slt提供一个获得洞察力和网络的在线机会。方法通过专业网络和滚雪球抽样法招募学员和导师。六名来自不同专业的在职slt自愿担任“导师”,并在Zoom上分配了单独的分组讨论室。学生,“指导者”,根据SLT阶段分组,有机会在10分钟的间隔内向每位专家提问。每一组学员都被轮流安排,直到他们见到了所有的六名专家。反馈是通过在线问卷获得的。15名学员(67%为学生,33%为新合格的slt)参加了会议。从学员的反馈中出现了一些关键主题,包括向各种专家学习的价值、同侪学习的好处以及最佳的学员与导师比例。建议包括增加后续问题的时间。导师们也报告了积极的经历,表达了分享知识、交流机会、反思机会和欣赏巡回赛形式的乐趣。他们建议每个分组讨论室增加时间,并提前接受问题。反馈表明,指导回路有效地提供了见解,促进了参与者之间的临床实践分享。学员和导师都报告了积极的经历,表明一种互惠互利的师徒关系。这种方法可以被其他医疗保健专业考虑,以支持学生在学位期间的临床实习学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Mentoring Circuit: An Innovative Speed-Dating Approach to Support Career Awareness in Speech and Language Therapy

The Mentoring Circuit: An Innovative Speed-Dating Approach to Support Career Awareness in Speech and Language Therapy

Background

Traditional placements in speech and language therapy (SLT) courses pose challenges for students to gain exposure and exchange knowledge within a wide range of specialties in the profession. To counteract this, we piloted an innovative ‘mentoring circuit’ to provide an online opportunity for student and newly qualified SLTs to gain insights and network.

Approach

Mentees and mentors were recruited through professional networks and snowball sampling methods. Six working SLTs from different specialties volunteered as ‘mentors’ and were allocated individual breakout rooms on Zoom. Students, ‘mentees’, were grouped according to SLT stages, were given the opportunity to ask questions to each specialist in 10-min intervals. Each group of mentees were rotated along the circuit until they met all six specialists. Feedback was obtained via an online questionnaire.

Evaluation

Fifteen mentees (67% students, 33% newly qualified SLTs) attended. Key themes emerged from mentees' feedback, including the value of learning from a diverse range of specialists, benefits of peer learning and optimal mentees–mentor ratio. Suggestions included additional time for follow-up questions. Mentors also reported positive experiences, expressing enjoyment in sharing knowledge, networking opportunities, opportunities to reflect and appreciation for the circuit's format. They suggested additional time per breakout room and receiving questions in advance.

Implications

Feedback showed that the mentoring circuit effectively provided insights and facilitated the sharing of clinical practices among participants. Both mentees and mentors reported positive experiences, indicating a mutually beneficial mentoring relationship. This approach can be considered by other healthcare professions to support clinical placement learning during the students' degree.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信