缺血性卒中中阿司匹林或氯吡格雷药物抵抗的流行:向精准医学迈进的一步

IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Samantha Cencer, Laurel Packard, Alan Davis, Asad Ahrar, Malgorzata Miller, Nadeem Khan, Nabil Wees, Jiangyong Min
{"title":"缺血性卒中中阿司匹林或氯吡格雷药物抵抗的流行:向精准医学迈进的一步","authors":"Samantha Cencer,&nbsp;Laurel Packard,&nbsp;Alan Davis,&nbsp;Asad Ahrar,&nbsp;Malgorzata Miller,&nbsp;Nadeem Khan,&nbsp;Nabil Wees,&nbsp;Jiangyong Min","doi":"10.1111/cns.70343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Currently, there is not sufficient data regarding the prevalence of resistance or inadequate platelet function inhibition with the use of antiplatelet therapy in patients with noncardioembolic stroke. This study was designed to evaluate the prevalence of antiplatelet inactivity to aspirin and clopidogrel in the setting of chronic use and presentation with primary or recurrent stroke.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients who were taking aspirin, clopidogrel, or both at the time of presentation for stroke were selected in this study. Those with confirmed stroke on MRI or clinically determined TIA and age &gt; 18 years were included. A standard laboratory test, VerifyNow aspirin or P2Y12 assay, was utilized to assess the responsiveness to the platelet inhibitors. A total of 158 patients were identified, 52 presenting with primary stroke and 106 with recurrent stroke. Data were analyzed using chi-squared or Fisher's exact as well as <i>t</i>-test analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the primary stroke population, 4% of patients demonstrated resistance to aspirin and 30% to clopidogrel. Of the patients presenting with recurrent stroke, 13% demonstrated resistance to aspirin and 38% to clopidogrel. The data also suggest increased resistance to aspirin and clopidogrel in Caucasians compared to minorities, with 11% versus 8% in regard to aspirin and 33% versus 17% to clopidogrel. Additionally, this study demonstrated 17% resistance to aspirin in males compared to 4% in females and 13% in males compared to 36% in females, respectively, regarding resistance to clopidogrel. No difference in inactivity to either aspirin or clopidogrel was detected between patients with stroke mechanisms of small or large vessel disease.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The present result demonstrated that a sizeable portion of the population has inefficacious activity in the setting of specific antiplatelet agents. Additionally, sex and ethnicity differences in responsiveness to aspirin or clopidogrel have been noted. Determining a patient's response to medications could provide opportunities to individualize treatment and better prevent future strokes. Further studies of a larger scale are indeed needed to apply this information to pursue individualized treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":154,"journal":{"name":"CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics","volume":"31 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cns.70343","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of Aspirin or Clopidogrel Pharmacological Resistance in Ischemic Stroke: A Step Toward Precision Medicine\",\"authors\":\"Samantha Cencer,&nbsp;Laurel Packard,&nbsp;Alan Davis,&nbsp;Asad Ahrar,&nbsp;Malgorzata Miller,&nbsp;Nadeem Khan,&nbsp;Nabil Wees,&nbsp;Jiangyong Min\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cns.70343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Currently, there is not sufficient data regarding the prevalence of resistance or inadequate platelet function inhibition with the use of antiplatelet therapy in patients with noncardioembolic stroke. This study was designed to evaluate the prevalence of antiplatelet inactivity to aspirin and clopidogrel in the setting of chronic use and presentation with primary or recurrent stroke.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients who were taking aspirin, clopidogrel, or both at the time of presentation for stroke were selected in this study. Those with confirmed stroke on MRI or clinically determined TIA and age &gt; 18 years were included. A standard laboratory test, VerifyNow aspirin or P2Y12 assay, was utilized to assess the responsiveness to the platelet inhibitors. A total of 158 patients were identified, 52 presenting with primary stroke and 106 with recurrent stroke. Data were analyzed using chi-squared or Fisher's exact as well as <i>t</i>-test analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of the primary stroke population, 4% of patients demonstrated resistance to aspirin and 30% to clopidogrel. Of the patients presenting with recurrent stroke, 13% demonstrated resistance to aspirin and 38% to clopidogrel. The data also suggest increased resistance to aspirin and clopidogrel in Caucasians compared to minorities, with 11% versus 8% in regard to aspirin and 33% versus 17% to clopidogrel. Additionally, this study demonstrated 17% resistance to aspirin in males compared to 4% in females and 13% in males compared to 36% in females, respectively, regarding resistance to clopidogrel. No difference in inactivity to either aspirin or clopidogrel was detected between patients with stroke mechanisms of small or large vessel disease.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The present result demonstrated that a sizeable portion of the population has inefficacious activity in the setting of specific antiplatelet agents. Additionally, sex and ethnicity differences in responsiveness to aspirin or clopidogrel have been noted. Determining a patient's response to medications could provide opportunities to individualize treatment and better prevent future strokes. Further studies of a larger scale are indeed needed to apply this information to pursue individualized treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cns.70343\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cns.70343\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cns.70343","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的目前,关于非心源性卒中患者使用抗血小板治疗的耐药患病率或血小板功能抑制不足的数据不足。本研究旨在评估阿司匹林和氯吡格雷在慢性使用和原发性或复发性卒中患者中抗血小板无活性的患病率。方法选择卒中就诊时正在服用阿司匹林、氯吡格雷或两者同时服用的患者。经MRI确诊为脑卒中或经临床诊断为TIA且年龄18岁的患者纳入研究。标准的实验室检测,VerifyNow阿司匹林或P2Y12测定,用于评估对血小板抑制剂的反应性。共有158例患者被确定,其中52例为原发性卒中,106例为复发性卒中。数据分析使用卡方或费雪精确值以及t检验分析。结果在原发性卒中人群中,4%的患者表现出对阿司匹林和30%氯吡格雷的耐药性。在复发性卒中患者中,13%表现出对阿司匹林的抵抗,38%表现出对氯吡格雷的抵抗。数据还表明,与少数族裔相比,白种人对阿司匹林和氯吡格雷的耐药性增加,阿司匹林和氯吡格雷的耐药率分别为11%和8%,氯吡格雷的耐药率分别为33%和17%。此外,该研究表明,在氯吡格雷耐药方面,男性对阿司匹林的耐药率为17%,女性为4%;男性为13%,女性为36%。卒中机制为小血管或大血管疾病的患者对阿司匹林或氯吡格雷的不活动无差异。结论目前的结果表明,相当大一部分人群在使用特异性抗血小板药物时无效。此外,性别和种族对阿司匹林或氯吡格雷的反应也有差异。确定患者对药物的反应可以为个性化治疗提供机会,并更好地预防未来的中风。确实需要更大规模的进一步研究来应用这些信息来追求个体化治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence of Aspirin or Clopidogrel Pharmacological Resistance in Ischemic Stroke: A Step Toward Precision Medicine

Background and Objectives

Currently, there is not sufficient data regarding the prevalence of resistance or inadequate platelet function inhibition with the use of antiplatelet therapy in patients with noncardioembolic stroke. This study was designed to evaluate the prevalence of antiplatelet inactivity to aspirin and clopidogrel in the setting of chronic use and presentation with primary or recurrent stroke.

Methods

Patients who were taking aspirin, clopidogrel, or both at the time of presentation for stroke were selected in this study. Those with confirmed stroke on MRI or clinically determined TIA and age > 18 years were included. A standard laboratory test, VerifyNow aspirin or P2Y12 assay, was utilized to assess the responsiveness to the platelet inhibitors. A total of 158 patients were identified, 52 presenting with primary stroke and 106 with recurrent stroke. Data were analyzed using chi-squared or Fisher's exact as well as t-test analysis.

Results

Of the primary stroke population, 4% of patients demonstrated resistance to aspirin and 30% to clopidogrel. Of the patients presenting with recurrent stroke, 13% demonstrated resistance to aspirin and 38% to clopidogrel. The data also suggest increased resistance to aspirin and clopidogrel in Caucasians compared to minorities, with 11% versus 8% in regard to aspirin and 33% versus 17% to clopidogrel. Additionally, this study demonstrated 17% resistance to aspirin in males compared to 4% in females and 13% in males compared to 36% in females, respectively, regarding resistance to clopidogrel. No difference in inactivity to either aspirin or clopidogrel was detected between patients with stroke mechanisms of small or large vessel disease.

Conclusions

The present result demonstrated that a sizeable portion of the population has inefficacious activity in the setting of specific antiplatelet agents. Additionally, sex and ethnicity differences in responsiveness to aspirin or clopidogrel have been noted. Determining a patient's response to medications could provide opportunities to individualize treatment and better prevent future strokes. Further studies of a larger scale are indeed needed to apply this information to pursue individualized treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
12.70%
发文量
240
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics provides a medium for rapid publication of original clinical, experimental, and translational research papers, timely reviews and reports of novel findings of therapeutic relevance to the central nervous system, as well as papers related to clinical pharmacology, drug development and novel methodologies for drug evaluation. The journal focuses on neurological and psychiatric diseases such as stroke, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, depression, schizophrenia, epilepsy, and drug abuse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信