难以捉摸的历史地震发震源:1706年迈埃拉(意大利中部)6.8级地震的启示

IF 3.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
T. Volatili, V. Gironelli, L. Luzi, P. Galli, M. M. C. Carafa, E. Tondi
{"title":"难以捉摸的历史地震发震源:1706年迈埃拉(意大利中部)6.8级地震的启示","authors":"T. Volatili,&nbsp;V. Gironelli,&nbsp;L. Luzi,&nbsp;P. Galli,&nbsp;M. M. C. Carafa,&nbsp;E. Tondi","doi":"10.1007/s10518-025-02110-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The central Apennines are renowned for their active NW-SE striking and SW-dipping normal-fault systems responsible for significant seismic events. However, uncertainties persist in attributing some past destructive earthquakes to seismogenic sources, as in the case of the 1706 Maiella earthquake (Mw 6.8, Abruzzi region). This study comprehensively assesses competing source hypotheses derived from the literature and uses geological and geophysical data to constrain their possible fault geometry. Employing a 3D seismogenic source model approach, we rigorously analyze the earthquake-fault association, assessing the misfit between the simulated site intensities and the macroseismic values estimated from the historical accounts. Our findings highlight the complexities in determining a reliable source for the 1706 earthquake. Finally, the best-fit source model was adopted to produce ground motion predictions regarding Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA), Peak Ground Velocity (PGV), and macroseismic intensity, including site effects, coupling the ground motion model (GMM-ITA18; Lanzano et al. 2019) and the ground motion intensity conversion equation (GMICE; Gomez Capera et al., 2020). The presented outcomes possibly unveil the shaking scenario that occurred in the past and perhaps in the future. These results, shedding light on one of the most relevant unknowns of the Apennine seismicity, offer valuable insights to better constrain the seismic hazard of this region, with implications for seismic risk mitigation strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 4","pages":"1279 - 1296"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elusive seismogenic sources of historical earthquakes: insights from the Mw 6.8, 1706 Maiella earthquake (central Italy)\",\"authors\":\"T. Volatili,&nbsp;V. Gironelli,&nbsp;L. Luzi,&nbsp;P. Galli,&nbsp;M. M. C. Carafa,&nbsp;E. Tondi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10518-025-02110-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The central Apennines are renowned for their active NW-SE striking and SW-dipping normal-fault systems responsible for significant seismic events. However, uncertainties persist in attributing some past destructive earthquakes to seismogenic sources, as in the case of the 1706 Maiella earthquake (Mw 6.8, Abruzzi region). This study comprehensively assesses competing source hypotheses derived from the literature and uses geological and geophysical data to constrain their possible fault geometry. Employing a 3D seismogenic source model approach, we rigorously analyze the earthquake-fault association, assessing the misfit between the simulated site intensities and the macroseismic values estimated from the historical accounts. Our findings highlight the complexities in determining a reliable source for the 1706 earthquake. Finally, the best-fit source model was adopted to produce ground motion predictions regarding Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA), Peak Ground Velocity (PGV), and macroseismic intensity, including site effects, coupling the ground motion model (GMM-ITA18; Lanzano et al. 2019) and the ground motion intensity conversion equation (GMICE; Gomez Capera et al., 2020). The presented outcomes possibly unveil the shaking scenario that occurred in the past and perhaps in the future. These results, shedding light on one of the most relevant unknowns of the Apennine seismicity, offer valuable insights to better constrain the seismic hazard of this region, with implications for seismic risk mitigation strategies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"23 4\",\"pages\":\"1279 - 1296\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02110-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02110-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

亚平宁山脉中部以其活跃的北西-东南走向和西向倾斜的正断层系统而闻名,这些正断层系统导致了重大的地震事件。然而,将过去的一些破坏性地震归因于地震源的不确定性仍然存在,例如1706年的Maiella地震(Abruzzi地区的6.8级地震)。本研究全面评估了从文献中得出的相互竞争的源假设,并使用地质和地球物理数据来约束它们可能的断层几何形状。采用三维孕震源模型方法,我们严格分析了地震-断层关联,评估了模拟场地强度与历史记录估计的宏观地震值之间的不匹配。我们的发现强调了确定1706年地震可靠来源的复杂性。最后,采用最佳拟合震源模型,结合地面运动模型(GMM-ITA18),对峰值地面加速度(PGA)、峰值地面速度(PGV)和宏观地震烈度(包括场地效应)进行预测。Lanzano et al. 2019)和地震动强度转换方程(GMICE;Gomez Capera et al., 2020)。提出的结果可能会揭示过去发生的震动场景,也许将来也会发生。这些结果揭示了亚平宁地震活动的一个最相关的未知因素,为更好地限制该地区的地震危险提供了宝贵的见解,并对减轻地震风险的战略产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Elusive seismogenic sources of historical earthquakes: insights from the Mw 6.8, 1706 Maiella earthquake (central Italy)

The central Apennines are renowned for their active NW-SE striking and SW-dipping normal-fault systems responsible for significant seismic events. However, uncertainties persist in attributing some past destructive earthquakes to seismogenic sources, as in the case of the 1706 Maiella earthquake (Mw 6.8, Abruzzi region). This study comprehensively assesses competing source hypotheses derived from the literature and uses geological and geophysical data to constrain their possible fault geometry. Employing a 3D seismogenic source model approach, we rigorously analyze the earthquake-fault association, assessing the misfit between the simulated site intensities and the macroseismic values estimated from the historical accounts. Our findings highlight the complexities in determining a reliable source for the 1706 earthquake. Finally, the best-fit source model was adopted to produce ground motion predictions regarding Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA), Peak Ground Velocity (PGV), and macroseismic intensity, including site effects, coupling the ground motion model (GMM-ITA18; Lanzano et al. 2019) and the ground motion intensity conversion equation (GMICE; Gomez Capera et al., 2020). The presented outcomes possibly unveil the shaking scenario that occurred in the past and perhaps in the future. These results, shedding light on one of the most relevant unknowns of the Apennine seismicity, offer valuable insights to better constrain the seismic hazard of this region, with implications for seismic risk mitigation strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信