踝关节跖屈、背屈、膝关节屈曲和模拟小腿肌肉收缩引起的胫骨动脉支架变形

Christopher P. Cheng PhD , Johan Bondesson PhD , Anna Johnson , Stanley K. Zimmerman MD
{"title":"踝关节跖屈、背屈、膝关节屈曲和模拟小腿肌肉收缩引起的胫骨动脉支架变形","authors":"Christopher P. Cheng PhD ,&nbsp;Johan Bondesson PhD ,&nbsp;Anna Johnson ,&nbsp;Stanley K. Zimmerman MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Tibial artery stent deformations have not been previously published and are critical for the evaluation and development of below-the-knee treatments.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Balloon-expandable stents were implanted into the anterior tibial, posterior tibial, and peroneal arteries of cadaver legs, including ostium-crossing locations. Computed tomography and geometric modeling were used to quantify cross-sectional, axial, and bending stent deformations from ankle plantarflexion/dorsiflexion, knee flexion, and simulated calf muscle contraction for walking/running.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Single and overlapping stents (N = 53) were deployed into 23 tibial arteries and across 6 ostia. Diametric crush was experienced in the posterior tibial with knee flexion (–5.3% ± 3.2%, <em>P</em> &lt; .0001) and peroneal with ankle dorsiflexion (–2.4% ± 2.0%, <em>P</em> = .0016), and posterior tibial stents experienced greater diametric crush from knee flexion (–5.3% ± 3.2%) and calf compression (–3.4% ± 5.9%) compared to ankle motion (–0.2% ± 4.3%; <em>P</em> = .0009 and <em>P</em> = .0061, respectively). Ostium-crossing stents experienced order of magnitude higher axial shortening with knee flexion and ankle plantarflexion compared to those in single arteries. No stent bending was observed from any leg motion.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Diametric crush in posterior tibial and peroneal stents was potentially due to their location in the deep posterior compartment and adjacent to the soleus/gastrocnemius muscles that bulge with joint motion. Crush in the posterior tibial is greater for knee flexion and calf compression compared to ankle motion from a higher bone-to-muscle ratio near the ankle protecting against crush. Ostium-crossing stents experience larger shortening than those in individual arteries potentially because of a more oblique orientation. No significant stent bending was observed possibly because the midcalf is distant from knee and ankle joints and protected by the rigid tibia and fibula. These stent deformations can guide device development, interventional site selection, and indications for use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73990,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 102522"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tibial Artery Stent Deformations From Ankle Plantarflexion and Dorsiflexion, Knee Flexion, and Simulated Calf Muscle Contraction\",\"authors\":\"Christopher P. Cheng PhD ,&nbsp;Johan Bondesson PhD ,&nbsp;Anna Johnson ,&nbsp;Stanley K. Zimmerman MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Tibial artery stent deformations have not been previously published and are critical for the evaluation and development of below-the-knee treatments.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Balloon-expandable stents were implanted into the anterior tibial, posterior tibial, and peroneal arteries of cadaver legs, including ostium-crossing locations. Computed tomography and geometric modeling were used to quantify cross-sectional, axial, and bending stent deformations from ankle plantarflexion/dorsiflexion, knee flexion, and simulated calf muscle contraction for walking/running.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Single and overlapping stents (N = 53) were deployed into 23 tibial arteries and across 6 ostia. Diametric crush was experienced in the posterior tibial with knee flexion (–5.3% ± 3.2%, <em>P</em> &lt; .0001) and peroneal with ankle dorsiflexion (–2.4% ± 2.0%, <em>P</em> = .0016), and posterior tibial stents experienced greater diametric crush from knee flexion (–5.3% ± 3.2%) and calf compression (–3.4% ± 5.9%) compared to ankle motion (–0.2% ± 4.3%; <em>P</em> = .0009 and <em>P</em> = .0061, respectively). Ostium-crossing stents experienced order of magnitude higher axial shortening with knee flexion and ankle plantarflexion compared to those in single arteries. No stent bending was observed from any leg motion.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Diametric crush in posterior tibial and peroneal stents was potentially due to their location in the deep posterior compartment and adjacent to the soleus/gastrocnemius muscles that bulge with joint motion. Crush in the posterior tibial is greater for knee flexion and calf compression compared to ankle motion from a higher bone-to-muscle ratio near the ankle protecting against crush. Ostium-crossing stents experience larger shortening than those in individual arteries potentially because of a more oblique orientation. No significant stent bending was observed possibly because the midcalf is distant from knee and ankle joints and protected by the rigid tibia and fibula. These stent deformations can guide device development, interventional site selection, and indications for use.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 102522\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772930324022117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772930324022117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胫骨动脉支架变形尚未发表,对于评估和发展膝以下治疗至关重要。方法将球囊扩张支架植入尸体腿的胫骨前动脉、胫骨后动脉和腓骨动脉,包括穿过开口的部位。使用计算机断层扫描和几何建模来量化由踝关节跖屈/背屈、膝关节屈曲和模拟小腿肌肉收缩引起的横断面、轴向和弯曲支架变形。结果53例置入23条胫骨动脉和6个胫骨口。膝关节屈曲发生胫骨后径挤压(-5.3%±3.2%,P <;.0001)和腓骨支架,踝关节背屈(-2.4%±2.0%,P = 0.0016),与踝关节运动(-0.2%±4.3%)相比,膝关节屈曲(-5.3%±3.2%)和小腿压迫(-3.4%±5.9%)造成了更大的直径挤压;P = .0009和P = .0061)。与单动脉支架相比,在膝关节屈曲和踝关节跖屈曲的情况下,穿过口支架的轴向缩短量要高一个数量级。腿部运动未观察到支架弯曲。结论胫骨和腓骨后支架位于深后腔室,毗邻比目鱼/腓肠肌,其位置随关节运动而膨出,可能导致其发生直径挤压。在膝关节屈曲和小腿挤压时,胫骨后部的挤压比踝关节运动时更大,踝关节附近的骨肌比更高,可以防止挤压。与单个动脉相比,经口支架的缩短幅度更大,这可能是因为其定位更斜。没有观察到明显的支架弯曲,可能是因为小腿中部远离膝关节和踝关节,并受到刚性胫骨和腓骨的保护。这些支架变形可以指导设备的开发、介入部位的选择和使用适应症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tibial Artery Stent Deformations From Ankle Plantarflexion and Dorsiflexion, Knee Flexion, and Simulated Calf Muscle Contraction

Background

Tibial artery stent deformations have not been previously published and are critical for the evaluation and development of below-the-knee treatments.

Methods

Balloon-expandable stents were implanted into the anterior tibial, posterior tibial, and peroneal arteries of cadaver legs, including ostium-crossing locations. Computed tomography and geometric modeling were used to quantify cross-sectional, axial, and bending stent deformations from ankle plantarflexion/dorsiflexion, knee flexion, and simulated calf muscle contraction for walking/running.

Results

Single and overlapping stents (N = 53) were deployed into 23 tibial arteries and across 6 ostia. Diametric crush was experienced in the posterior tibial with knee flexion (–5.3% ± 3.2%, P < .0001) and peroneal with ankle dorsiflexion (–2.4% ± 2.0%, P = .0016), and posterior tibial stents experienced greater diametric crush from knee flexion (–5.3% ± 3.2%) and calf compression (–3.4% ± 5.9%) compared to ankle motion (–0.2% ± 4.3%; P = .0009 and P = .0061, respectively). Ostium-crossing stents experienced order of magnitude higher axial shortening with knee flexion and ankle plantarflexion compared to those in single arteries. No stent bending was observed from any leg motion.

Conclusions

Diametric crush in posterior tibial and peroneal stents was potentially due to their location in the deep posterior compartment and adjacent to the soleus/gastrocnemius muscles that bulge with joint motion. Crush in the posterior tibial is greater for knee flexion and calf compression compared to ankle motion from a higher bone-to-muscle ratio near the ankle protecting against crush. Ostium-crossing stents experience larger shortening than those in individual arteries potentially because of a more oblique orientation. No significant stent bending was observed possibly because the midcalf is distant from knee and ankle joints and protected by the rigid tibia and fibula. These stent deformations can guide device development, interventional site selection, and indications for use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信