喀麦隆社区森林企业(CFES)的可持续性绩效:通往可行商业模式的途径

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Serge Mandiefe Piabuo , Marjanke Hoogstra-Klein , Verina Ingram , Hens Runhaar , Serge Mandiefe Piabuo , Marjanke Hoogstra-Klein , Verina Ingram , Divine Foundjem-Tita , Peter A. Minang , Lalisa Duguma , Hens Runhaar
{"title":"喀麦隆社区森林企业(CFES)的可持续性绩效:通往可行商业模式的途径","authors":"Serge Mandiefe Piabuo ,&nbsp;Marjanke Hoogstra-Klein ,&nbsp;Verina Ingram ,&nbsp;Hens Runhaar ,&nbsp;Serge Mandiefe Piabuo ,&nbsp;Marjanke Hoogstra-Klein ,&nbsp;Verina Ingram ,&nbsp;Divine Foundjem-Tita ,&nbsp;Peter A. Minang ,&nbsp;Lalisa Duguma ,&nbsp;Hens Runhaar","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Community forestry has evolved from devolved forest management to the valorisation of forest resources for community development. Community forest enterprises (CFEs) now apply business approaches to enhance economic, social, and environmental outcomes. However, limited research has evaluated CFE performance in tropical countries across these dimensions. This paper proposes a contextualized multi-dimensional framework to evaluate CFEs' performance and applies it to nine CFEs in Cameroon. Data were collected from income and expenditure statements, forest land-use transects, satellite image analysis, and focus group discussions. The study evaluates the performance of Community Forest Enterprises (CFEs) in Cameroon using a multi-dimensional framework. The majority (66.67 %) are intermediate performers, with scores between 2.5 and 3. However, they score poorly on the economic dimension, making them intermediate but skewed performers with better scores on social and environmental dimensions. Only 11.11 % CFE is classified as an effective performer, with scores of three or above on all dimensions. The study found that CFEs face significant challenges in effectively allocating resources to trade in forest products and generating profits, resulting in poor economic performance. However, they perform better in investing in social projects, employing community members, and reducing illegal logging and agricultural expansion. Financial and technical support, policy coordination, and institutional collaboration are needed to improve performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 103470"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainability performance of community forest enterprises (CFES) in Cameroon: Pathways to viable business models\",\"authors\":\"Serge Mandiefe Piabuo ,&nbsp;Marjanke Hoogstra-Klein ,&nbsp;Verina Ingram ,&nbsp;Hens Runhaar ,&nbsp;Serge Mandiefe Piabuo ,&nbsp;Marjanke Hoogstra-Klein ,&nbsp;Verina Ingram ,&nbsp;Divine Foundjem-Tita ,&nbsp;Peter A. Minang ,&nbsp;Lalisa Duguma ,&nbsp;Hens Runhaar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Community forestry has evolved from devolved forest management to the valorisation of forest resources for community development. Community forest enterprises (CFEs) now apply business approaches to enhance economic, social, and environmental outcomes. However, limited research has evaluated CFE performance in tropical countries across these dimensions. This paper proposes a contextualized multi-dimensional framework to evaluate CFEs' performance and applies it to nine CFEs in Cameroon. Data were collected from income and expenditure statements, forest land-use transects, satellite image analysis, and focus group discussions. The study evaluates the performance of Community Forest Enterprises (CFEs) in Cameroon using a multi-dimensional framework. The majority (66.67 %) are intermediate performers, with scores between 2.5 and 3. However, they score poorly on the economic dimension, making them intermediate but skewed performers with better scores on social and environmental dimensions. Only 11.11 % CFE is classified as an effective performer, with scores of three or above on all dimensions. The study found that CFEs face significant challenges in effectively allocating resources to trade in forest products and generating profits, resulting in poor economic performance. However, they perform better in investing in social projects, employing community members, and reducing illegal logging and agricultural expansion. Financial and technical support, policy coordination, and institutional collaboration are needed to improve performance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"volume\":\"173 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103470\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125000498\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125000498","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社区林业已从下放森林管理演变为使森林资源增值以促进社区发展。社区森林企业(CFEs)现在运用商业方法来提高经济、社会和环境成果。然而,有限的研究从这些方面评估了热带国家CFE的表现。本文提出了一个情境化的多维框架来评估社区教育机构的绩效,并将其应用于喀麦隆的9个社区教育机构。数据收集自收支报表、森林土地利用样带、卫星图像分析和焦点小组讨论。该研究使用多维框架评估了喀麦隆社区森林企业(CFEs)的绩效。大多数(66.67%)是中等水平,得分在2.5到3之间。然而,他们在经济方面得分很低,这使得他们在社会和环境方面得分较高,但表现不佳。只有11.11%的CFE被归类为有效的执行者,在所有方面的得分都在3分或以上。研究发现,CFEs在有效分配资源用于林产品贸易和创造利润方面面临重大挑战,导致经济绩效不佳。然而,他们在投资社会项目、雇用社区成员、减少非法采伐和农业扩张方面表现更好。改善绩效需要财政和技术支持、政策协调和机构合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sustainability performance of community forest enterprises (CFES) in Cameroon: Pathways to viable business models
Community forestry has evolved from devolved forest management to the valorisation of forest resources for community development. Community forest enterprises (CFEs) now apply business approaches to enhance economic, social, and environmental outcomes. However, limited research has evaluated CFE performance in tropical countries across these dimensions. This paper proposes a contextualized multi-dimensional framework to evaluate CFEs' performance and applies it to nine CFEs in Cameroon. Data were collected from income and expenditure statements, forest land-use transects, satellite image analysis, and focus group discussions. The study evaluates the performance of Community Forest Enterprises (CFEs) in Cameroon using a multi-dimensional framework. The majority (66.67 %) are intermediate performers, with scores between 2.5 and 3. However, they score poorly on the economic dimension, making them intermediate but skewed performers with better scores on social and environmental dimensions. Only 11.11 % CFE is classified as an effective performer, with scores of three or above on all dimensions. The study found that CFEs face significant challenges in effectively allocating resources to trade in forest products and generating profits, resulting in poor economic performance. However, they perform better in investing in social projects, employing community members, and reducing illegal logging and agricultural expansion. Financial and technical support, policy coordination, and institutional collaboration are needed to improve performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Policy and Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
148
审稿时长
21.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信