IF 3.9 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Leandro Martín Ferrón , Cruz Borges , Aitziber Mugarra Elorriaga , Oxana Soimu
{"title":"From experts to citizens: Co-creating neighbourhood coziness metrics","authors":"Leandro Martín Ferrón ,&nbsp;Cruz Borges ,&nbsp;Aitziber Mugarra Elorriaga ,&nbsp;Oxana Soimu","doi":"10.1016/j.cacint.2025.100192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Current urban sustainability metrics often overlook local community preferences. The shortcomings of existing assessment tools stem not only from overarching frameworks but also from limitations in their key performance indicators. This study introduces a novel methodological approach integrating multidimensional indicators spanning environmental, social, and economic dimensions, culminating in the Community Coziness Rating. Structured expert discussions and a comprehensive survey across multiple European nations targeted non-expert residents to ensure a representative cross-section of perspectives. Survey participants evaluated indicators categorized and weighted for technical and community significance. Findings show building energy efficiency, air quality, and proximity to essential services were most critical, while technical metrics like smart energy management systems and advanced electric vehicle infrastructure ranked lower, highlighting a disconnect between expert prioritization and public perception. The proposed framework incorporates participatory action dynamics, enabling more nuanced, context-specific neighborhood evaluations that reflect localized needs and preferences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52395,"journal":{"name":"City and Environment Interactions","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100192"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"City and Environment Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590252025000066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前的城市可持续性衡量标准往往忽视了当地社区的偏好。现有评估工具的不足之处不仅在于总体框架,还在于其关键绩效指标的局限性。本研究引入了一种新颖的方法论,整合了环境、社会和经济等多维指标,最终得出社区舒适度评级。结构化专家讨论和横跨欧洲多个国家的综合调查以非专家居民为对象,以确保观点的代表性。调查参与者根据技术和社区重要性对指标进行了分类和加权评估。调查结果显示,建筑能效、空气质量和邻近基本服务设施最为关键,而智能能源管理系统和先进的电动汽车基础设施等技术指标则排名靠后,这凸显了专家优先排序与公众认知之间的脱节。所建议的框架结合了参与式行动动力学,使针对具体情况的街区评估更加细致入微,从而反映出当地的需求和偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From experts to citizens: Co-creating neighbourhood coziness metrics
Current urban sustainability metrics often overlook local community preferences. The shortcomings of existing assessment tools stem not only from overarching frameworks but also from limitations in their key performance indicators. This study introduces a novel methodological approach integrating multidimensional indicators spanning environmental, social, and economic dimensions, culminating in the Community Coziness Rating. Structured expert discussions and a comprehensive survey across multiple European nations targeted non-expert residents to ensure a representative cross-section of perspectives. Survey participants evaluated indicators categorized and weighted for technical and community significance. Findings show building energy efficiency, air quality, and proximity to essential services were most critical, while technical metrics like smart energy management systems and advanced electric vehicle infrastructure ranked lower, highlighting a disconnect between expert prioritization and public perception. The proposed framework incorporates participatory action dynamics, enabling more nuanced, context-specific neighborhood evaluations that reflect localized needs and preferences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
City and Environment Interactions
City and Environment Interactions Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
27 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信