混凝土中的工业副产品:最新评述

Karan Moolchandani
{"title":"混凝土中的工业副产品:最新评述","authors":"Karan Moolchandani","doi":"10.1016/j.nxmate.2025.100593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This state-of-the-art review evaluates the application of industrial byproducts—fly ash (FA), silica fume (SF), and marble slurry powder (MSP)—in concrete, emphasizing their standalone effects on fresh, mechanical, durability, and morphological properties. FA, derived from coal combustion, enhances workability, reduces hydration heat by 15–20 %, and improves long-term compressive strength by 25–30 %. SF, a byproduct of silicon alloy production, refines the microstructure, reduces permeability by 40 %, and increases early-age compressive strength by 30–35 %. MSP, generated as marble processing waste, acts as a filler, reducing porosity and improving flexural strength by 20 % while achieving around 9 % reduction in production costs at 15 % replacement level. The review identifies optimal replacement levels—FA (10–30 %), SF (5–15 %), and MSP (10–20 %)—to achieve improved performance and sustainability. Industrial byproducts in concrete contribute to significant environmental benefits, particularly through the reduction of CO₂ emissions. The incorporation of FA, SF, and MSP in concrete reduces CO₂ emissions primarily by lowering clinker demand, as cement production is a major contributor to global CO₂ emissions. Studies indicate that replacing 30–50 % of cement with FA and SF can achieve CO₂ reductions of 12–25 %, depending on mix design, clinker factor reduction, and curing conditions. MSP, primarily acting as a filler, contributes to minor reductions by partially replacing cement without additional pozzolanic reactivity. This review synthesizes findings from recent studies to assess the environmental benefits of these materials in concrete, demonstrating the transformative potential of industrial byproducts in creating high-performance and eco-efficient concrete.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100958,"journal":{"name":"Next Materials","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100593"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Industrial byproducts in concrete: A state-of-the-art review\",\"authors\":\"Karan Moolchandani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nxmate.2025.100593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This state-of-the-art review evaluates the application of industrial byproducts—fly ash (FA), silica fume (SF), and marble slurry powder (MSP)—in concrete, emphasizing their standalone effects on fresh, mechanical, durability, and morphological properties. FA, derived from coal combustion, enhances workability, reduces hydration heat by 15–20 %, and improves long-term compressive strength by 25–30 %. SF, a byproduct of silicon alloy production, refines the microstructure, reduces permeability by 40 %, and increases early-age compressive strength by 30–35 %. MSP, generated as marble processing waste, acts as a filler, reducing porosity and improving flexural strength by 20 % while achieving around 9 % reduction in production costs at 15 % replacement level. The review identifies optimal replacement levels—FA (10–30 %), SF (5–15 %), and MSP (10–20 %)—to achieve improved performance and sustainability. Industrial byproducts in concrete contribute to significant environmental benefits, particularly through the reduction of CO₂ emissions. The incorporation of FA, SF, and MSP in concrete reduces CO₂ emissions primarily by lowering clinker demand, as cement production is a major contributor to global CO₂ emissions. Studies indicate that replacing 30–50 % of cement with FA and SF can achieve CO₂ reductions of 12–25 %, depending on mix design, clinker factor reduction, and curing conditions. MSP, primarily acting as a filler, contributes to minor reductions by partially replacing cement without additional pozzolanic reactivity. This review synthesizes findings from recent studies to assess the environmental benefits of these materials in concrete, demonstrating the transformative potential of industrial byproducts in creating high-performance and eco-efficient concrete.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Next Materials\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100593\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Next Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294982282500111X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Next Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294982282500111X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇最新的综述评估了工业副产品——粉煤灰(FA)、硅灰(SF)和大理石浆粉(MSP)在混凝土中的应用,强调了它们对新鲜、机械、耐久性和形态特性的独立影响。煤燃烧产生的FA可提高和易性,降低水化热15 - 20% %,提高长期抗压强度25 - 30% %。SF是硅合金生产的副产品,细化了组织,降低了40 %的渗透率,提高了30-35 %的早期抗压强度。MSP作为大理石加工废料产生,作为填料,减少孔隙率,提高20% %的抗折强度,同时在15 %的替换水平上实现约9 %的生产成本降低。评估确定了最佳的替代水平——fa(10-30 %)、SF(5-15 %)和MSP(10-20 %),以提高性能和可持续性。混凝土中的工业副产品有助于显著的环境效益,特别是通过减少二氧化碳排放。在混凝土中掺入FA、SF和MSP主要通过降低熟料需求来减少二氧化碳排放,因为水泥生产是全球二氧化碳排放的主要来源。研究表明,用FA和SF替代30 - 50% %的水泥,可实现12-25 %的CO₂减排,具体取决于配合比设计、熟料因子还原和养护条件。MSP主要作为填料,在不增加火山灰反应性的情况下部分替代水泥,从而起到了微小的减少作用。这篇综述综合了最近的研究结果,以评估这些材料在混凝土中的环境效益,展示了工业副产品在创造高性能和生态高效混凝土方面的变革潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Industrial byproducts in concrete: A state-of-the-art review
This state-of-the-art review evaluates the application of industrial byproducts—fly ash (FA), silica fume (SF), and marble slurry powder (MSP)—in concrete, emphasizing their standalone effects on fresh, mechanical, durability, and morphological properties. FA, derived from coal combustion, enhances workability, reduces hydration heat by 15–20 %, and improves long-term compressive strength by 25–30 %. SF, a byproduct of silicon alloy production, refines the microstructure, reduces permeability by 40 %, and increases early-age compressive strength by 30–35 %. MSP, generated as marble processing waste, acts as a filler, reducing porosity and improving flexural strength by 20 % while achieving around 9 % reduction in production costs at 15 % replacement level. The review identifies optimal replacement levels—FA (10–30 %), SF (5–15 %), and MSP (10–20 %)—to achieve improved performance and sustainability. Industrial byproducts in concrete contribute to significant environmental benefits, particularly through the reduction of CO₂ emissions. The incorporation of FA, SF, and MSP in concrete reduces CO₂ emissions primarily by lowering clinker demand, as cement production is a major contributor to global CO₂ emissions. Studies indicate that replacing 30–50 % of cement with FA and SF can achieve CO₂ reductions of 12–25 %, depending on mix design, clinker factor reduction, and curing conditions. MSP, primarily acting as a filler, contributes to minor reductions by partially replacing cement without additional pozzolanic reactivity. This review synthesizes findings from recent studies to assess the environmental benefits of these materials in concrete, demonstrating the transformative potential of industrial byproducts in creating high-performance and eco-efficient concrete.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信