使用学习设计和学习分析促进、检测和支持社会共享的学习规则:系统的文献综述

IF 8.9 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Cristina Villa-Torrano , Wannapon Suraworachet , Eduardo Gómez-Sánchez , Juan I. Asensio-Pérez , Miguel L. Bote-Lorenzo , Alejandra Martínez-Monés , Qi Zhou , Mutlu Cukurova , Yannis Dimitriadis
{"title":"使用学习设计和学习分析促进、检测和支持社会共享的学习规则:系统的文献综述","authors":"Cristina Villa-Torrano ,&nbsp;Wannapon Suraworachet ,&nbsp;Eduardo Gómez-Sánchez ,&nbsp;Juan I. Asensio-Pérez ,&nbsp;Miguel L. Bote-Lorenzo ,&nbsp;Alejandra Martínez-Monés ,&nbsp;Qi Zhou ,&nbsp;Mutlu Cukurova ,&nbsp;Yannis Dimitriadis","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent developments in educational technology research underscores the importance of individuals and groups to regulate their own learning processes and behaviours to cope with the fast-changing world around them. This led many researchers to focus on the concept of Socially-Shared Regulation of Learning (SSRL) which tries to understand the different types of collective regulatory processes that emerge while learning in groups. Although initial investigations have predominantly theorised these phenomena, there is a growing need to operationalise SSRL to prepare learners for a future in which regulation of their learning is a key skill for success. This necessitates systematic examination of how Learning Design (LD) and Learning Analytics (LA) can be leveraged to promote, detect, and support SSRL. Therefore, this paper presents a systematic literature review of 110 empirical studies with the aim of identifying: (i) what does empirical literature consider as SSRL; (ii) how is LD used to promote SSRL; (iii) how are LA and LD used to detect SSRL; and (iv) how are LD and LA used to support SSRL. The findings from the literature indicate three major challenges to the operationalisation of SSRL support in the real-world: (i) the lack of convergence in theoretical models, together with the lack of validated instruments for detecting (e.g., coding schemes) and measuring (e.g., questionnaires) SSRL processes; (ii) the types of data most frequently collected and the analysis techniques used make it difficult to provide SSRL support to the students during the learning situations; and (iii) there is a lack of tools designed to promote, detect, and support SSRL processes. This paper describes each challenge, and provides a discussion about potential future research opportunities for tackling them.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"232 ","pages":"Article 105261"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using learning design and learning analytics to promote, detect and support Socially-Shared Regulation of Learning: A systematic literature review\",\"authors\":\"Cristina Villa-Torrano ,&nbsp;Wannapon Suraworachet ,&nbsp;Eduardo Gómez-Sánchez ,&nbsp;Juan I. Asensio-Pérez ,&nbsp;Miguel L. Bote-Lorenzo ,&nbsp;Alejandra Martínez-Monés ,&nbsp;Qi Zhou ,&nbsp;Mutlu Cukurova ,&nbsp;Yannis Dimitriadis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Recent developments in educational technology research underscores the importance of individuals and groups to regulate their own learning processes and behaviours to cope with the fast-changing world around them. This led many researchers to focus on the concept of Socially-Shared Regulation of Learning (SSRL) which tries to understand the different types of collective regulatory processes that emerge while learning in groups. Although initial investigations have predominantly theorised these phenomena, there is a growing need to operationalise SSRL to prepare learners for a future in which regulation of their learning is a key skill for success. This necessitates systematic examination of how Learning Design (LD) and Learning Analytics (LA) can be leveraged to promote, detect, and support SSRL. Therefore, this paper presents a systematic literature review of 110 empirical studies with the aim of identifying: (i) what does empirical literature consider as SSRL; (ii) how is LD used to promote SSRL; (iii) how are LA and LD used to detect SSRL; and (iv) how are LD and LA used to support SSRL. The findings from the literature indicate three major challenges to the operationalisation of SSRL support in the real-world: (i) the lack of convergence in theoretical models, together with the lack of validated instruments for detecting (e.g., coding schemes) and measuring (e.g., questionnaires) SSRL processes; (ii) the types of data most frequently collected and the analysis techniques used make it difficult to provide SSRL support to the students during the learning situations; and (iii) there is a lack of tools designed to promote, detect, and support SSRL processes. This paper describes each challenge, and provides a discussion about potential future research opportunities for tackling them.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Education\",\"volume\":\"232 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131525000296\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131525000296","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教育技术研究的最新发展强调了个人和团体调节自己的学习过程和行为以应对周围快速变化的世界的重要性。这导致许多研究人员关注社会共享学习调节(SSRL)的概念,该概念试图理解在群体学习中出现的不同类型的集体调节过程。尽管最初的研究主要是将这些现象理论化,但越来越多的人需要将SSRL付诸实践,以帮助学习者为未来做好准备,在未来,学习调节是成功的关键技能。这需要系统地检查如何利用学习设计(LD)和学习分析(LA)来促进、检测和支持SSRL。因此,本文对110项实证研究进行了系统的文献综述,旨在确定:(i)实证文献认为什么是SSRL;(ii)如何利用劳工处推广策略性土地回收计划;(iii)如何使用LA和LD来检测SSRL;以及(iv)如何使用LD和LA来支持SSRL。文献的研究结果表明,在现实世界中,SSRL支持的实施面临三大挑战:(i)理论模型缺乏收敛性,同时缺乏用于检测(如编码方案)和测量(如问卷调查)SSRL过程的有效工具;(ii)最常收集的数据类型和所使用的分析技术,使我们难以在学生的学习情况下为他们提供SSRL支持;(iii)缺乏旨在促进、检测和支持SSRL进程的工具。本文描述了每个挑战,并提供了一个关于解决这些挑战的潜在未来研究机会的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using learning design and learning analytics to promote, detect and support Socially-Shared Regulation of Learning: A systematic literature review
Recent developments in educational technology research underscores the importance of individuals and groups to regulate their own learning processes and behaviours to cope with the fast-changing world around them. This led many researchers to focus on the concept of Socially-Shared Regulation of Learning (SSRL) which tries to understand the different types of collective regulatory processes that emerge while learning in groups. Although initial investigations have predominantly theorised these phenomena, there is a growing need to operationalise SSRL to prepare learners for a future in which regulation of their learning is a key skill for success. This necessitates systematic examination of how Learning Design (LD) and Learning Analytics (LA) can be leveraged to promote, detect, and support SSRL. Therefore, this paper presents a systematic literature review of 110 empirical studies with the aim of identifying: (i) what does empirical literature consider as SSRL; (ii) how is LD used to promote SSRL; (iii) how are LA and LD used to detect SSRL; and (iv) how are LD and LA used to support SSRL. The findings from the literature indicate three major challenges to the operationalisation of SSRL support in the real-world: (i) the lack of convergence in theoretical models, together with the lack of validated instruments for detecting (e.g., coding schemes) and measuring (e.g., questionnaires) SSRL processes; (ii) the types of data most frequently collected and the analysis techniques used make it difficult to provide SSRL support to the students during the learning situations; and (iii) there is a lack of tools designed to promote, detect, and support SSRL processes. This paper describes each challenge, and provides a discussion about potential future research opportunities for tackling them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信