分析自闭症患者社会动机的异质性

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Lacey Chetcuti, Antonio Y. Hardan, Emily Spackman, Eva Loth, James C. McPartland, Thomas W. Frazier, Eric A. Youngstrom, Mirko Uljarevic
{"title":"分析自闭症患者社会动机的异质性","authors":"Lacey Chetcuti,&nbsp;Antonio Y. Hardan,&nbsp;Emily Spackman,&nbsp;Eva Loth,&nbsp;James C. McPartland,&nbsp;Thomas W. Frazier,&nbsp;Eric A. Youngstrom,&nbsp;Mirko Uljarevic","doi":"10.1111/jcpp.14147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Social motivation is posited as a key factor in the expression of the autism phenotype. However, lack of precision in both conceptualization and measurement has impeded a thorough understanding of its diverse presentation and associated outcomes. This study addresses this gap by identifying subgroups of autism characterized by deficits in distinct facets of social motivation, relative to normative benchmarks.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data were from 509 participants with autism, aged 5-to-21 years (<i>M</i> = 10.43, <i>SD</i> = 3.67; 81% male), enrolled in the Healthy Brain Network. Latent profile analysis was employed to identify subgroups characterized by unique configurations of reticence, seeking, and maintaining facets of social motivation, derived from a comprehensive multi-instrument factor analysis of symptom and screening measures. Pearson's chi-square tests and one-way analysis of variance were performed to explore subgroup differences in demographic characteristics, <i>cognitive abilities, co-occurring psychopathologies, and other aspects of social functioning.</i></p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Four distinct subgroups were identified: Engaged (<i>n</i> = 247), exhibiting the fewest challenges across each area; Inhibited (<i>n</i> = 143), characterized by high reticence, mild challenges in seeking, and few challenges in maintaining; Aloof (<i>n</i> = 68), characterized by challenges with seeking and maintaining but relatively low reticence; and Avoidant (<i>n</i> = 52), characterized by the highest challenges across all areas. Subgroups did not differ in terms of chronological age or sex. The Engaged subgroup exhibited the fewest challenges in other aspects of social functioning and co-occurring psychopathologies, while the Avoidant subgroup exhibited the greatest challenges, and with the Inhibited and Aloof profiles falling in between.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study highlights the heterogeneous nature of deficits in social motivation in autism relative to normative benchmarks, suggesting potential avenues for tailored interventions aimed at addressing the specific challenges experienced by individuals within each subgroup. Nevertheless, there remains a need to develop more refined measurement tools capable of capturing even finer-grained aspects and diverse expressions of social motivation, facilitating further characterization of individual differences across diagnostic boundaries.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":187,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry","volume":"66 9","pages":"1376-1389"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parsing the heterogeneity of social motivation in autism\",\"authors\":\"Lacey Chetcuti,&nbsp;Antonio Y. Hardan,&nbsp;Emily Spackman,&nbsp;Eva Loth,&nbsp;James C. McPartland,&nbsp;Thomas W. Frazier,&nbsp;Eric A. Youngstrom,&nbsp;Mirko Uljarevic\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jcpp.14147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Social motivation is posited as a key factor in the expression of the autism phenotype. However, lack of precision in both conceptualization and measurement has impeded a thorough understanding of its diverse presentation and associated outcomes. This study addresses this gap by identifying subgroups of autism characterized by deficits in distinct facets of social motivation, relative to normative benchmarks.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data were from 509 participants with autism, aged 5-to-21 years (<i>M</i> = 10.43, <i>SD</i> = 3.67; 81% male), enrolled in the Healthy Brain Network. Latent profile analysis was employed to identify subgroups characterized by unique configurations of reticence, seeking, and maintaining facets of social motivation, derived from a comprehensive multi-instrument factor analysis of symptom and screening measures. Pearson's chi-square tests and one-way analysis of variance were performed to explore subgroup differences in demographic characteristics, <i>cognitive abilities, co-occurring psychopathologies, and other aspects of social functioning.</i></p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Four distinct subgroups were identified: Engaged (<i>n</i> = 247), exhibiting the fewest challenges across each area; Inhibited (<i>n</i> = 143), characterized by high reticence, mild challenges in seeking, and few challenges in maintaining; Aloof (<i>n</i> = 68), characterized by challenges with seeking and maintaining but relatively low reticence; and Avoidant (<i>n</i> = 52), characterized by the highest challenges across all areas. Subgroups did not differ in terms of chronological age or sex. The Engaged subgroup exhibited the fewest challenges in other aspects of social functioning and co-occurring psychopathologies, while the Avoidant subgroup exhibited the greatest challenges, and with the Inhibited and Aloof profiles falling in between.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study highlights the heterogeneous nature of deficits in social motivation in autism relative to normative benchmarks, suggesting potential avenues for tailored interventions aimed at addressing the specific challenges experienced by individuals within each subgroup. Nevertheless, there remains a need to develop more refined measurement tools capable of capturing even finer-grained aspects and diverse expressions of social motivation, facilitating further characterization of individual differences across diagnostic boundaries.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"66 9\",\"pages\":\"1376-1389\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcpp.14147\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcpp.14147","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会动机被认为是自闭症表型表达的关键因素。然而,在概念化和测量方面缺乏精确性阻碍了对其多样化表现和相关结果的彻底理解。本研究通过确定相对于规范基准而言在社会动机的不同方面存在缺陷的自闭症亚群来解决这一差距。方法数据来自509名5 - 21岁自闭症患者(M = 10.43, SD = 3.67;81%男性),加入了健康大脑网络。通过对症状和筛选措施的综合多工具因素分析,采用潜在剖面分析来确定具有沉默、寻求和维持社会动机方面独特配置特征的亚群。采用Pearson卡方检验和单向方差分析来探讨亚组在人口统计学特征、认知能力、共同发生的精神病理和社会功能其他方面的差异。结果发现了四个不同的亚组:敬业(n = 247),在每个领域表现出最少的挑战;抑制性(n = 143),表现为高度沉默,寻找困难轻微,维持困难很少;孤傲(n = 68),以寻求和维持的挑战为特征,但相对较低的沉默;回避型(n = 52),其特点是在所有领域都面临最高的挑战。亚组在实际年龄或性别方面没有差异。在社会功能和共同发生的精神病理的其他方面,参与亚组表现出最少的挑战,而回避亚组表现出最大的挑战,而抑制和冷漠的特征介于两者之间。本研究强调了自闭症患者社会动机缺陷相对于规范基准的异质性,提出了针对每个亚组中个体所经历的具体挑战进行量身定制干预的潜在途径。然而,仍然需要开发更精细的测量工具,能够捕捉更细粒度的方面和社会动机的不同表达,促进跨诊断边界的个体差异的进一步表征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Parsing the heterogeneity of social motivation in autism

Parsing the heterogeneity of social motivation in autism

Parsing the heterogeneity of social motivation in autism

Background

Social motivation is posited as a key factor in the expression of the autism phenotype. However, lack of precision in both conceptualization and measurement has impeded a thorough understanding of its diverse presentation and associated outcomes. This study addresses this gap by identifying subgroups of autism characterized by deficits in distinct facets of social motivation, relative to normative benchmarks.

Methods

Data were from 509 participants with autism, aged 5-to-21 years (M = 10.43, SD = 3.67; 81% male), enrolled in the Healthy Brain Network. Latent profile analysis was employed to identify subgroups characterized by unique configurations of reticence, seeking, and maintaining facets of social motivation, derived from a comprehensive multi-instrument factor analysis of symptom and screening measures. Pearson's chi-square tests and one-way analysis of variance were performed to explore subgroup differences in demographic characteristics, cognitive abilities, co-occurring psychopathologies, and other aspects of social functioning.

Results

Four distinct subgroups were identified: Engaged (n = 247), exhibiting the fewest challenges across each area; Inhibited (n = 143), characterized by high reticence, mild challenges in seeking, and few challenges in maintaining; Aloof (n = 68), characterized by challenges with seeking and maintaining but relatively low reticence; and Avoidant (n = 52), characterized by the highest challenges across all areas. Subgroups did not differ in terms of chronological age or sex. The Engaged subgroup exhibited the fewest challenges in other aspects of social functioning and co-occurring psychopathologies, while the Avoidant subgroup exhibited the greatest challenges, and with the Inhibited and Aloof profiles falling in between.

Conclusions

This study highlights the heterogeneous nature of deficits in social motivation in autism relative to normative benchmarks, suggesting potential avenues for tailored interventions aimed at addressing the specific challenges experienced by individuals within each subgroup. Nevertheless, there remains a need to develop more refined measurement tools capable of capturing even finer-grained aspects and diverse expressions of social motivation, facilitating further characterization of individual differences across diagnostic boundaries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
169
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (JCPP) is a highly regarded international publication that focuses on the fields of child and adolescent psychology and psychiatry. It is recognized for publishing top-tier, clinically relevant research across various disciplines related to these areas. JCPP has a broad global readership and covers a diverse range of topics, including: Epidemiology: Studies on the prevalence and distribution of mental health issues in children and adolescents. Diagnosis: Research on the identification and classification of childhood disorders. Treatments: Psychotherapeutic and psychopharmacological interventions for child and adolescent mental health. Behavior and Cognition: Studies on the behavioral and cognitive aspects of childhood disorders. Neuroscience and Neurobiology: Research on the neural and biological underpinnings of child mental health. Genetics: Genetic factors contributing to the development of childhood disorders. JCPP serves as a platform for integrating empirical research, clinical studies, and high-quality reviews from diverse perspectives, theoretical viewpoints, and disciplines. This interdisciplinary approach is a key feature of the journal, as it fosters a comprehensive understanding of child and adolescent mental health. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry is published 12 times a year and is affiliated with the Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health (ACAMH), which supports the journal's mission to advance knowledge and practice in the field of child and adolescent mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信