{"title":"通过降低ΔG定制生物催化剂:整合基态不稳定和过渡态稳定","authors":"Xin Xu, Wanqing Wei, Yiwen Zhou, Jia Liu, Cong Gao, Guipeng Hu, Xiaomin Li, Jian Wen, Liming Liu, Jing Wu, Wei Song","doi":"10.1016/j.checat.2025.101323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Enzymatic catalysts are increasingly recognized for their potential to revolutionize the chemical industry by enabling precise control of reaction pathways, reducing energy consumption, and minimizing waste, thereby offering exceptional selectivity and sustainability. Enzyme engineering, which focuses on modifying natural enzymes to meet industrial needs, plays a pivotal role in this transformation. A key objective of enzyme engineering is to lower the free energy barrier (ΔG<sup>‡</sup>). This review delves into computationally driven strategies designed to accomplish this objective. These strategies are classified into two distinct approaches: ground-state destabilization (GSD) and transition-state stabilization (TSS). For example, GSD may involve reshaping the hydrogen bonding network to elevate ground state energy, while TSS can stabilize the transition state by modulating local electric fields. GSD strategies involve modulating substrate-binding free energy to destabilize the ground state, reshaping hydrogen bonding networks, and refining binding conformations. TSS methods involve modulating proton and electron transfers, optimizing local electric fields, and modifying active sites based on transition-state models. Furthermore, this review contrasts GSD and TSS approaches, discussing their computational underpinnings, respective advantages, and limitations throughout the text to provide a comprehensive understanding of their applications. Finally, we explore technical challenges, the impact of emerging technologies, and the directions and trends of future research.","PeriodicalId":53121,"journal":{"name":"Chem Catalysis","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Customizing biocatalysts by reducing ΔG‡: Integrating ground-state destabilization and transition-state stabilization\",\"authors\":\"Xin Xu, Wanqing Wei, Yiwen Zhou, Jia Liu, Cong Gao, Guipeng Hu, Xiaomin Li, Jian Wen, Liming Liu, Jing Wu, Wei Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.checat.2025.101323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Enzymatic catalysts are increasingly recognized for their potential to revolutionize the chemical industry by enabling precise control of reaction pathways, reducing energy consumption, and minimizing waste, thereby offering exceptional selectivity and sustainability. Enzyme engineering, which focuses on modifying natural enzymes to meet industrial needs, plays a pivotal role in this transformation. A key objective of enzyme engineering is to lower the free energy barrier (ΔG<sup>‡</sup>). This review delves into computationally driven strategies designed to accomplish this objective. These strategies are classified into two distinct approaches: ground-state destabilization (GSD) and transition-state stabilization (TSS). For example, GSD may involve reshaping the hydrogen bonding network to elevate ground state energy, while TSS can stabilize the transition state by modulating local electric fields. GSD strategies involve modulating substrate-binding free energy to destabilize the ground state, reshaping hydrogen bonding networks, and refining binding conformations. TSS methods involve modulating proton and electron transfers, optimizing local electric fields, and modifying active sites based on transition-state models. Furthermore, this review contrasts GSD and TSS approaches, discussing their computational underpinnings, respective advantages, and limitations throughout the text to provide a comprehensive understanding of their applications. Finally, we explore technical challenges, the impact of emerging technologies, and the directions and trends of future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chem Catalysis\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chem Catalysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.checat.2025.101323\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chem Catalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.checat.2025.101323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Customizing biocatalysts by reducing ΔG‡: Integrating ground-state destabilization and transition-state stabilization
Enzymatic catalysts are increasingly recognized for their potential to revolutionize the chemical industry by enabling precise control of reaction pathways, reducing energy consumption, and minimizing waste, thereby offering exceptional selectivity and sustainability. Enzyme engineering, which focuses on modifying natural enzymes to meet industrial needs, plays a pivotal role in this transformation. A key objective of enzyme engineering is to lower the free energy barrier (ΔG‡). This review delves into computationally driven strategies designed to accomplish this objective. These strategies are classified into two distinct approaches: ground-state destabilization (GSD) and transition-state stabilization (TSS). For example, GSD may involve reshaping the hydrogen bonding network to elevate ground state energy, while TSS can stabilize the transition state by modulating local electric fields. GSD strategies involve modulating substrate-binding free energy to destabilize the ground state, reshaping hydrogen bonding networks, and refining binding conformations. TSS methods involve modulating proton and electron transfers, optimizing local electric fields, and modifying active sites based on transition-state models. Furthermore, this review contrasts GSD and TSS approaches, discussing their computational underpinnings, respective advantages, and limitations throughout the text to provide a comprehensive understanding of their applications. Finally, we explore technical challenges, the impact of emerging technologies, and the directions and trends of future research.
期刊介绍:
Chem Catalysis is a monthly journal that publishes innovative research on fundamental and applied catalysis, providing a platform for researchers across chemistry, chemical engineering, and related fields. It serves as a premier resource for scientists and engineers in academia and industry, covering heterogeneous, homogeneous, and biocatalysis. Emphasizing transformative methods and technologies, the journal aims to advance understanding, introduce novel catalysts, and connect fundamental insights to real-world applications for societal benefit.