血糖自我控制远程监测对1型糖尿病患者碳水化合物代谢及生活质量的影响

L A Suplotova, O O Alieva, L I Ibragimova
{"title":"血糖自我控制远程监测对1型糖尿病患者碳水化合物代谢及生活质量的影响","authors":"L A Suplotova, O O Alieva, L I Ibragimova","doi":"10.14341/probl13535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is the main tool to achieve carbohydrate metabolism targets in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM). Remote monitoring of SMBG in Russia appeared relatively recently and needs to be evaluated for effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the effect of remote monitoring of SMBG on carbohydrate metabolism and quality of life in patients with type 1 DM in order to form new therapeutic approaches.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients with type 1 DM with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from 8.0 to 12.0% were divided into the main (n=107) and control group (n=20). Patients from the main group performed SMBG using glucometers with the possibility of remote data transmission, patients from the control group continued the traditional SMBG. The dynamics of HbA1c, derived time spent in the target ranges, recognition of hypoglycemia (GOLD scale, Clarke questionnaire), quality of life according to the SF-36 questionnaire were evaluated. The statistical analysis was carried out in the SPSS Version 26.0 program (IBM, USA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the main group (n=88) the HbA1c was statistically significant decreased after 6 months from 9.0% [8.4; 9.9] to 8.1% [7.4; 9.2] (p&lt;0.001), with SMBG more than 4 times a day - up to 7.3% [7.0; 7.8] (p=0.001). In the control group (n=20), by the 6th month, HbA1c increased to 10.1% [8,9; 11,2] (p=0,010). Derived Time In Range in the main group increased to 69.9±13.0 (95% CI 65.73-74.03; p&lt;0.001); derived Time Above Range significantly decreased to 9.5% [6.4; 15.0] (p&lt;0.001), derived Time Below Range - to 6.7% [2.8; 12.2] (p=0.044); Coefficient of Variation reached 36.3±7.9 (95% CI 33.7-38.8; p&lt;0.001). According to the results of SF-36, the physical and psychological components of the quality of life in the main group significantly improved (p&lt;0.001). Recognition of hypoglycemia improved in the intervention group (-4.5% of patients (p=0.046) according to the Clarke questionnaire; -8% (p=0.008) on the GOLD scale).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Remote monitoring of SMBG is a prospective therapeutic approach due to its positive effect on carbohydrate metabolism and quality of life in patients with type 1 DM.</p>","PeriodicalId":101419,"journal":{"name":"Problemy endokrinologii","volume":"71 1","pages":"40-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931467/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The impact of remote monitoring of glycemia self-control on carbohydrate metabolism and quality of life in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus].\",\"authors\":\"L A Suplotova, O O Alieva, L I Ibragimova\",\"doi\":\"10.14341/probl13535\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is the main tool to achieve carbohydrate metabolism targets in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM). Remote monitoring of SMBG in Russia appeared relatively recently and needs to be evaluated for effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the effect of remote monitoring of SMBG on carbohydrate metabolism and quality of life in patients with type 1 DM in order to form new therapeutic approaches.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients with type 1 DM with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from 8.0 to 12.0% were divided into the main (n=107) and control group (n=20). Patients from the main group performed SMBG using glucometers with the possibility of remote data transmission, patients from the control group continued the traditional SMBG. The dynamics of HbA1c, derived time spent in the target ranges, recognition of hypoglycemia (GOLD scale, Clarke questionnaire), quality of life according to the SF-36 questionnaire were evaluated. The statistical analysis was carried out in the SPSS Version 26.0 program (IBM, USA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the main group (n=88) the HbA1c was statistically significant decreased after 6 months from 9.0% [8.4; 9.9] to 8.1% [7.4; 9.2] (p&lt;0.001), with SMBG more than 4 times a day - up to 7.3% [7.0; 7.8] (p=0.001). In the control group (n=20), by the 6th month, HbA1c increased to 10.1% [8,9; 11,2] (p=0,010). Derived Time In Range in the main group increased to 69.9±13.0 (95% CI 65.73-74.03; p&lt;0.001); derived Time Above Range significantly decreased to 9.5% [6.4; 15.0] (p&lt;0.001), derived Time Below Range - to 6.7% [2.8; 12.2] (p=0.044); Coefficient of Variation reached 36.3±7.9 (95% CI 33.7-38.8; p&lt;0.001). According to the results of SF-36, the physical and psychological components of the quality of life in the main group significantly improved (p&lt;0.001). Recognition of hypoglycemia improved in the intervention group (-4.5% of patients (p=0.046) according to the Clarke questionnaire; -8% (p=0.008) on the GOLD scale).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Remote monitoring of SMBG is a prospective therapeutic approach due to its positive effect on carbohydrate metabolism and quality of life in patients with type 1 DM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Problemy endokrinologii\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"40-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931467/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Problemy endokrinologii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14341/probl13535\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problemy endokrinologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14341/probl13535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自我血糖监测(SMBG)是1型糖尿病(DM)患者实现碳水化合物代谢指标的主要手段。俄罗斯SMBG的远程监测出现的时间相对较晚,需要对其有效性进行评估。目的:探讨远程监测SMBG对1型糖尿病患者碳水化合物代谢及生活质量的影响,以期形成新的治疗方法。材料与方法:将糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)在8.0 ~ 12.0%的1型糖尿病患者分为主组(n=107)和对照组(n=20)。主组患者使用可远程传输数据的血糖仪进行SMBG,对照组患者继续传统的SMBG。根据SF-36问卷评估两组患者的HbA1c动态、在目标范围内停留的时间、低血糖的识别(GOLD量表、Clarke问卷)和生活质量。统计分析采用SPSS Version 26.0程序(IBM, USA)进行。结果:主组患者(88例)6个月后HbA1c由9.0% [8.4;9.9]至8.1% [7.4;9.2] (p<0.001),每天SMBG超过4次-高达7.3% [7.0;7.8 (p = 0.001)。在对照组(n=20),到第6个月,HbA1c升高至10.1% [8,9;11、2](p = 0010)。主组的衍生时间范围增加到69.9±13.0 (95% CI 65.73-74.03;术中,0.001);衍生时间高于范围显著下降至9.5% [6.4];15.0] (p<0.001),导出时间低于范围-至6.7% [2.8;12.2) (p = 0.044);变异系数达到36.3±7.9 (95% CI 33.7-38.8;术中,0.001)。根据SF-36的结果,主要组的生理和心理组成部分的生活质量显著改善(p<0.001)。根据Clarke问卷,干预组患者对低血糖的认知改善(-4.5% (p=0.046);GOLD量表-8% (p=0.008)。结论:远程监测SMBG对1型糖尿病患者的碳水化合物代谢和生活质量有积极的影响,是一种前瞻性的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[The impact of remote monitoring of glycemia self-control on carbohydrate metabolism and quality of life in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus].

Background: Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is the main tool to achieve carbohydrate metabolism targets in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM). Remote monitoring of SMBG in Russia appeared relatively recently and needs to be evaluated for effectiveness.

Aim: To evaluate the effect of remote monitoring of SMBG on carbohydrate metabolism and quality of life in patients with type 1 DM in order to form new therapeutic approaches.

Materials and methods: Patients with type 1 DM with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from 8.0 to 12.0% were divided into the main (n=107) and control group (n=20). Patients from the main group performed SMBG using glucometers with the possibility of remote data transmission, patients from the control group continued the traditional SMBG. The dynamics of HbA1c, derived time spent in the target ranges, recognition of hypoglycemia (GOLD scale, Clarke questionnaire), quality of life according to the SF-36 questionnaire were evaluated. The statistical analysis was carried out in the SPSS Version 26.0 program (IBM, USA).

Results: In the main group (n=88) the HbA1c was statistically significant decreased after 6 months from 9.0% [8.4; 9.9] to 8.1% [7.4; 9.2] (p<0.001), with SMBG more than 4 times a day - up to 7.3% [7.0; 7.8] (p=0.001). In the control group (n=20), by the 6th month, HbA1c increased to 10.1% [8,9; 11,2] (p=0,010). Derived Time In Range in the main group increased to 69.9±13.0 (95% CI 65.73-74.03; p<0.001); derived Time Above Range significantly decreased to 9.5% [6.4; 15.0] (p<0.001), derived Time Below Range - to 6.7% [2.8; 12.2] (p=0.044); Coefficient of Variation reached 36.3±7.9 (95% CI 33.7-38.8; p<0.001). According to the results of SF-36, the physical and psychological components of the quality of life in the main group significantly improved (p<0.001). Recognition of hypoglycemia improved in the intervention group (-4.5% of patients (p=0.046) according to the Clarke questionnaire; -8% (p=0.008) on the GOLD scale).

Conclusion: Remote monitoring of SMBG is a prospective therapeutic approach due to its positive effect on carbohydrate metabolism and quality of life in patients with type 1 DM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信