大麻研究的国家资助:资助机制和水平的分析。

IF 4.1 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Agnes Balla, Raymond G Boyle, Christina Dempsey
{"title":"大麻研究的国家资助:资助机制和水平的分析。","authors":"Agnes Balla, Raymond G Boyle, Christina Dempsey","doi":"10.1186/s42238-025-00264-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This paper examines cannabis research funding across U.S. states that have legalized cannabis for medical or adult (non-medical) use. It specifically looks at state legislative efforts to fund cannabis research, and the amount and mechanisms used for funding distribution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed the text of legalization measures within states allowing medical or adult use (non-medical) cannabis for statutory language relating to research or scientific funding. When statutory language on research or scientific funding was not readily available or unclear in the legislative text, we reviewed state government websites or reference materials, or contacted state officials directly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, we found that 17 out of 38 states that have passed either medical or adult use laws have legislation that specify a funding mechanism for cannabis research. Of the 17 states that have legislation directing funding to research, only 12 have allocated funding to date. Of those states that have allocated funding, six states distributed funds directly to an academic institution and five moved funding first through state agencies. One state - California - distributed research funding to both an academic institution and through the state cannabis regulatory agency. The amount of funding varies significantly across the states.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>States have much to gain from scientific advancements in the cannabis field, especially as they navigate a preponderance of public policy issues without a federal structure to lean upon. However, with less than half of states that have legalized cannabis use in some form providing funding for research, there is a missed opportunity for states to increase understanding of the risks and benefits of cannabis use within their state. There is also a missed opportunity for researchers and cannabis regulators to collaborate on informing policy options and developing future evidence-informed cannabis regulations. There is a need for more states to consider adopting mechanisms to support cannabis research.</p>","PeriodicalId":101310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cannabis research","volume":"7 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11908053/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State funding for cannabis research: an analysis of funding mechanisms and levels.\",\"authors\":\"Agnes Balla, Raymond G Boyle, Christina Dempsey\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42238-025-00264-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This paper examines cannabis research funding across U.S. states that have legalized cannabis for medical or adult (non-medical) use. It specifically looks at state legislative efforts to fund cannabis research, and the amount and mechanisms used for funding distribution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed the text of legalization measures within states allowing medical or adult use (non-medical) cannabis for statutory language relating to research or scientific funding. When statutory language on research or scientific funding was not readily available or unclear in the legislative text, we reviewed state government websites or reference materials, or contacted state officials directly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, we found that 17 out of 38 states that have passed either medical or adult use laws have legislation that specify a funding mechanism for cannabis research. Of the 17 states that have legislation directing funding to research, only 12 have allocated funding to date. Of those states that have allocated funding, six states distributed funds directly to an academic institution and five moved funding first through state agencies. One state - California - distributed research funding to both an academic institution and through the state cannabis regulatory agency. The amount of funding varies significantly across the states.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>States have much to gain from scientific advancements in the cannabis field, especially as they navigate a preponderance of public policy issues without a federal structure to lean upon. However, with less than half of states that have legalized cannabis use in some form providing funding for research, there is a missed opportunity for states to increase understanding of the risks and benefits of cannabis use within their state. There is also a missed opportunity for researchers and cannabis regulators to collaborate on informing policy options and developing future evidence-informed cannabis regulations. There is a need for more states to consider adopting mechanisms to support cannabis research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cannabis research\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11908053/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cannabis research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-025-00264-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cannabis research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-025-00264-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本文考察了美国各州大麻研究资金,这些州已将大麻合法化,用于医疗或成人(非医疗)使用。它特别关注各州为大麻研究提供资金的立法努力,以及用于资金分配的数量和机制。方法:我们审查了允许医疗或成人使用(非医疗)大麻的州内合法化措施的文本,以了解与研究或科学资助有关的法定语言。当关于研究或科学资助的法定语言在立法文本中不容易获得或不明确时,我们查看州政府网站或参考材料,或直接联系州政府官员。结果:总体而言,我们发现38个州中有17个已经通过了医疗或成人使用法律,其中有立法规定了大麻研究的资助机制。在17个立法指导研究资金的州中,迄今为止只有12个州拨出了资金。在这些分配资金的州中,有六个州直接将资金分配给学术机构,五个州首先通过州机构转移资金。一个州——加利福尼亚——将研究经费分配给一个学术机构和通过州大麻管理机构。各州的资金数额差别很大。结论:各州可以从大麻领域的科学进步中获益良多,特别是当他们在没有联邦结构的情况下处理公共政策问题时。然而,在以某种形式将大麻使用合法化的州中,只有不到一半的州为研究提供资金,因此各州错过了在其州内增加对大麻使用风险和益处的了解的机会。研究人员和大麻监管机构也失去了一个合作的机会,为政策选择提供信息,并制定未来的循证大麻法规。有必要让更多的国家考虑采用支持大麻研究的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
State funding for cannabis research: an analysis of funding mechanisms and levels.

Background: This paper examines cannabis research funding across U.S. states that have legalized cannabis for medical or adult (non-medical) use. It specifically looks at state legislative efforts to fund cannabis research, and the amount and mechanisms used for funding distribution.

Methods: We reviewed the text of legalization measures within states allowing medical or adult use (non-medical) cannabis for statutory language relating to research or scientific funding. When statutory language on research or scientific funding was not readily available or unclear in the legislative text, we reviewed state government websites or reference materials, or contacted state officials directly.

Results: Overall, we found that 17 out of 38 states that have passed either medical or adult use laws have legislation that specify a funding mechanism for cannabis research. Of the 17 states that have legislation directing funding to research, only 12 have allocated funding to date. Of those states that have allocated funding, six states distributed funds directly to an academic institution and five moved funding first through state agencies. One state - California - distributed research funding to both an academic institution and through the state cannabis regulatory agency. The amount of funding varies significantly across the states.

Conclusion: States have much to gain from scientific advancements in the cannabis field, especially as they navigate a preponderance of public policy issues without a federal structure to lean upon. However, with less than half of states that have legalized cannabis use in some form providing funding for research, there is a missed opportunity for states to increase understanding of the risks and benefits of cannabis use within their state. There is also a missed opportunity for researchers and cannabis regulators to collaborate on informing policy options and developing future evidence-informed cannabis regulations. There is a need for more states to consider adopting mechanisms to support cannabis research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信