重复二期置换术治疗复发性假膝周围感染87例疗效分析。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Oliver B Dilger, Aaron R Owen, Nicholas A Bedard, Tad M Mabry, Daniel J Berry, Matthew P Abdel
{"title":"重复二期置换术治疗复发性假膝周围感染87例疗效分析。","authors":"Oliver B Dilger, Aaron R Owen, Nicholas A Bedard, Tad M Mabry, Daniel J Berry, Matthew P Abdel","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the success of two-stage exchange total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), a subset of patients become reinfected and may be considered for a repeat two-stage exchange TKAs. A small, prior study from our institution demonstrated a 50% re-revision rate in such a cohort. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate a contemporary and larger cohort of repeat two-stage exchange TKAs with an emphasis on implant survivorship, risk factors, and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified 87 repeat two-stage exchange TKAs performed between 2014 and 2021. The mean patient age was 66 years, 32% were women, and the mean body mass index was 29. At the time of resection, 98% of patients were treated with a high-dose antibiotic spacer (58 nonarticulating and 27 articulating). The mean time from resection arthroplasty to reimplantation was 22 weeks. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analyses were performed, and risk factors (including the McPherson staging system) were assessed. The mean follow-up was five years (range, two to nine).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 5-year survivorships free of rerevision for reinfection, any rerevision, and any reoperation were 88, 67, and 54%, respectively. Leading causes for rerevision were periprosthetic joint infection (36%) and aseptic loosening (27%). There were no statistically significant independent risk factors identified. However, patients who had McPherson host grade C trended toward higher rates of reoperation (hazard ratio: 2, P = 0.057). Despite the high reoperation rate, at the final follow-up (mean five years), 91% of patients had a TKA in situ, 8% had been treated with above-knee amputation, and 1% with a definitive resection arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite its challenges, including a 54% reoperation rate, repeat two-stage exchange TKAs may be considered in a subset of patients given 91% of patients had a TKA in situ at a mean of five years, and the 5-year survivorship free of rerevision for infection was 88%. Notably, patients who were McPherson host grade C trended toward failure.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repeat Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Recurrent Periprosthetic Knee Infection: Results of 87 Cases.\",\"authors\":\"Oliver B Dilger, Aaron R Owen, Nicholas A Bedard, Tad M Mabry, Daniel J Berry, Matthew P Abdel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the success of two-stage exchange total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), a subset of patients become reinfected and may be considered for a repeat two-stage exchange TKAs. A small, prior study from our institution demonstrated a 50% re-revision rate in such a cohort. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate a contemporary and larger cohort of repeat two-stage exchange TKAs with an emphasis on implant survivorship, risk factors, and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified 87 repeat two-stage exchange TKAs performed between 2014 and 2021. The mean patient age was 66 years, 32% were women, and the mean body mass index was 29. At the time of resection, 98% of patients were treated with a high-dose antibiotic spacer (58 nonarticulating and 27 articulating). The mean time from resection arthroplasty to reimplantation was 22 weeks. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analyses were performed, and risk factors (including the McPherson staging system) were assessed. The mean follow-up was five years (range, two to nine).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 5-year survivorships free of rerevision for reinfection, any rerevision, and any reoperation were 88, 67, and 54%, respectively. Leading causes for rerevision were periprosthetic joint infection (36%) and aseptic loosening (27%). There were no statistically significant independent risk factors identified. However, patients who had McPherson host grade C trended toward higher rates of reoperation (hazard ratio: 2, P = 0.057). Despite the high reoperation rate, at the final follow-up (mean five years), 91% of patients had a TKA in situ, 8% had been treated with above-knee amputation, and 1% with a definitive resection arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite its challenges, including a 54% reoperation rate, repeat two-stage exchange TKAs may be considered in a subset of patients given 91% of patients had a TKA in situ at a mean of five years, and the 5-year survivorship free of rerevision for infection was 88%. Notably, patients who were McPherson host grade C trended toward failure.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.005\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导语:尽管两期置换全膝关节置换术(tka)取得了成功,但仍有一部分患者会再次感染,可能会考虑再次进行两期置换全膝关节置换术。我们机构之前的一项小型研究表明,在这样的队列中,重新修订率为50%。本研究的目的是评估当代更大的重复两期交换tka队列,重点是种植体存活、风险因素和临床结果。方法回顾性分析了2014年至2021年间进行的87例重复两阶段交换tka。患者平均年龄66岁,32%为女性,平均体重指数(BMI)为29。在切除时,98%的患者接受了高剂量抗生素间隔剂治疗(58例非关节,27例关节)。从关节置换术切除到再植的平均时间为22周。进行Kaplan-Meier生存分析,并评估危险因素(包括McPherson分期系统)。平均随访5年(2 ~ 9年)。结果:无再感染、无再翻修和无再手术的5年生存率分别为88%、67%和54%。再次翻修的主要原因是PJI(36%)和无菌性松动(27%)。未发现有统计学意义的独立危险因素。然而,McPherson宿主分级为C级的患者有更高的再手术率(HR[危险比]2,P=0.057)。尽管再手术率很高,但在最后的随访中(平均5年),91%的患者原位TKA, 8%的患者进行了膝上截肢,1%的患者进行了明确的关节置换术。结论:尽管存在挑战,包括54%的再手术率,但由于91%的患者在平均5年的时间内原位置换性TKA,并且无感染再次翻修的5年生存率为88%,因此可以考虑对一部分患者进行重复两期置换TKA。值得注意的是,McPherson宿主C级的患者倾向于失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Repeat Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Recurrent Periprosthetic Knee Infection: Results of 87 Cases.

Background: Despite the success of two-stage exchange total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), a subset of patients become reinfected and may be considered for a repeat two-stage exchange TKAs. A small, prior study from our institution demonstrated a 50% re-revision rate in such a cohort. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate a contemporary and larger cohort of repeat two-stage exchange TKAs with an emphasis on implant survivorship, risk factors, and clinical outcomes.

Methods: We retrospectively identified 87 repeat two-stage exchange TKAs performed between 2014 and 2021. The mean patient age was 66 years, 32% were women, and the mean body mass index was 29. At the time of resection, 98% of patients were treated with a high-dose antibiotic spacer (58 nonarticulating and 27 articulating). The mean time from resection arthroplasty to reimplantation was 22 weeks. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analyses were performed, and risk factors (including the McPherson staging system) were assessed. The mean follow-up was five years (range, two to nine).

Results: The 5-year survivorships free of rerevision for reinfection, any rerevision, and any reoperation were 88, 67, and 54%, respectively. Leading causes for rerevision were periprosthetic joint infection (36%) and aseptic loosening (27%). There were no statistically significant independent risk factors identified. However, patients who had McPherson host grade C trended toward higher rates of reoperation (hazard ratio: 2, P = 0.057). Despite the high reoperation rate, at the final follow-up (mean five years), 91% of patients had a TKA in situ, 8% had been treated with above-knee amputation, and 1% with a definitive resection arthroplasty.

Conclusions: Despite its challenges, including a 54% reoperation rate, repeat two-stage exchange TKAs may be considered in a subset of patients given 91% of patients had a TKA in situ at a mean of five years, and the 5-year survivorship free of rerevision for infection was 88%. Notably, patients who were McPherson host grade C trended toward failure.

Level of evidence: Level IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信